Methanol mix A/F ratio code CRACKED!
#1
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (59)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,010
Likes: 46
From: Virginia
Methanol mix A/F ratio code CRACKED!
8/23/2022 I FOUND THE SPREADSHEET!
ok, putting my assumptions up front.
methanol burns appropriately for FI at 5.5:1 (most scientifically backed figure found on google)
gasoline burns appropriately for FI at 11.5:1 (from experience on here)
the weight of gasoline is 6.25 lb/gal (most scientifically backed figure found on google)
my bsfc is .6 (from Kurt Urban)
my (future) flywheel horsepower will be 1200
I have calculated earlier that I move 22.2 gal/hr methanol
(375 ml/min nozzle + 625 ml/min nozzle at 220 psi pressure) (from Matt Snow)
the rest is math. here we go.. this took 6 post-it-notes to get right.
Total Fuel Flow = hp * bsfc = 1200 * .6 = 720 lb/hr
720 lb/hr * 6.25 #/gal = 115.2 gal/hr
11.5 parts air to 1 part gasoline = 12.5 parts total
total flow through the engine (air + fuel) = 12.5 * 115.2 gal/hr = 1440 gal/hr
% of total flow that is gasoline = 1 / 12.5 = .08 = 8%
now here is the addition of methanol to the flow
1440 gal/hr + 22.2 gal/hr = 1462.2 gal/hr (total flow of air + gas + methanol)
% of total flow that is methanol = 22.2 / 1462.2 = .01518 = 1.518%
the ratio of methanol % flow to fuel % flow = 1.518 / 8 = .18975
this .18975 is the methanol part of the 1 fuel part (in the X:1) a/f ratio
the gasoline part is what is left over (1 - .18975) = .81025
the new combined air/fuel rato is...
gasoline factor + methanol factor = new appropriate mixture a/f ratio
(11.5 * .81025) + (5.5 * .18975) = 10.3615
you can also calculate your new octane rating with the same factors
(93 * .81025) + (126 * .18975) = 99.26 (a close guess on the meth octane)
whew!
*remember you have to calculate your OWN methanol flow and use your own flywheel horsepower..
*this is only my effort at the calculation, I certainly cannot gauantee it is 100% correct.
questions / comments please!
Link to Calculator Spreadsheet
ok, putting my assumptions up front.
methanol burns appropriately for FI at 5.5:1 (most scientifically backed figure found on google)
gasoline burns appropriately for FI at 11.5:1 (from experience on here)
the weight of gasoline is 6.25 lb/gal (most scientifically backed figure found on google)
my bsfc is .6 (from Kurt Urban)
my (future) flywheel horsepower will be 1200
I have calculated earlier that I move 22.2 gal/hr methanol
(375 ml/min nozzle + 625 ml/min nozzle at 220 psi pressure) (from Matt Snow)
the rest is math. here we go.. this took 6 post-it-notes to get right.
Total Fuel Flow = hp * bsfc = 1200 * .6 = 720 lb/hr
720 lb/hr * 6.25 #/gal = 115.2 gal/hr
11.5 parts air to 1 part gasoline = 12.5 parts total
total flow through the engine (air + fuel) = 12.5 * 115.2 gal/hr = 1440 gal/hr
% of total flow that is gasoline = 1 / 12.5 = .08 = 8%
now here is the addition of methanol to the flow
1440 gal/hr + 22.2 gal/hr = 1462.2 gal/hr (total flow of air + gas + methanol)
% of total flow that is methanol = 22.2 / 1462.2 = .01518 = 1.518%
the ratio of methanol % flow to fuel % flow = 1.518 / 8 = .18975
this .18975 is the methanol part of the 1 fuel part (in the X:1) a/f ratio
the gasoline part is what is left over (1 - .18975) = .81025
the new combined air/fuel rato is...
gasoline factor + methanol factor = new appropriate mixture a/f ratio
(11.5 * .81025) + (5.5 * .18975) = 10.3615
you can also calculate your new octane rating with the same factors
(93 * .81025) + (126 * .18975) = 99.26 (a close guess on the meth octane)
whew!
*remember you have to calculate your OWN methanol flow and use your own flywheel horsepower..
*this is only my effort at the calculation, I certainly cannot gauantee it is 100% correct.
questions / comments please!
Link to Calculator Spreadsheet
Last edited by MIGHTYMOUSE; 08-23-2022 at 10:11 AM. Reason: added spreadsheet link
Trending Topics
#8
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (59)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,010
Likes: 46
From: Virginia
Originally Posted by ESR
all I have to say is excel formulas here I come
intmd8, maybe so.. but i have definitely read otherwise... do you have any good links on it?
here is the easy way for you slackers you can change whatever you want such as the octane rating for the alcohol if you like.
Link to Calculator Spreadsheet
and i'm spent.
Last edited by MIGHTYMOUSE; 05-13-2013 at 10:59 PM. Reason: updated link
#10
well it's nice to know all those figures, but really no need for all that math since the wideband does not care what fuel is used.The a-f number is just a programmed output.
If your using a wideband it outputs voltage/lambda. The display then shows an A-F number programmed to convert the voltage/lambda number into a a-f number for gasoline.
So if you were to convert your motor to pure methanol and ran it at a true 5-1 AF, your wideband would STILL show 11.5-1 unless you reprogrammed it for the new fuel.
5.5 is lean for methanol . Most racers using methanol run it near 4-1 but 5-1 is good.
5.5-1 methanol is the same lambda as 12.6-1 gasoline.
11.5-1 gasoline is the same lambda as 5-1 methanol.
11.5 is good and safe for either fuel.
So all you need to do is shoot for 11.5-1 on the wideband.
Methanol is no where near 126 octane. Just a tad over 100. But it has powerful detonation effects because of the shear volume of it used and the intense charge cooling it provides and is more detonation resistant than the best gasolines when run 100%.
But when you run it lean (5.5-1) it can be very prone to detonation.
Steve
If your using a wideband it outputs voltage/lambda. The display then shows an A-F number programmed to convert the voltage/lambda number into a a-f number for gasoline.
So if you were to convert your motor to pure methanol and ran it at a true 5-1 AF, your wideband would STILL show 11.5-1 unless you reprogrammed it for the new fuel.
5.5 is lean for methanol . Most racers using methanol run it near 4-1 but 5-1 is good.
5.5-1 methanol is the same lambda as 12.6-1 gasoline.
11.5-1 gasoline is the same lambda as 5-1 methanol.
11.5 is good and safe for either fuel.
So all you need to do is shoot for 11.5-1 on the wideband.
Methanol is no where near 126 octane. Just a tad over 100. But it has powerful detonation effects because of the shear volume of it used and the intense charge cooling it provides and is more detonation resistant than the best gasolines when run 100%.
But when you run it lean (5.5-1) it can be very prone to detonation.
Steve
#11
awesome !
now all we have to do is convert the methanol flow rate to be able to figure out what size nozzles to run
Or in yoru spreadsheet case, work iterate backwards until you find how much methanol you want to add, and find appropriate nozzles.
now all we have to do is convert the methanol flow rate to be able to figure out what size nozzles to run
Or in yoru spreadsheet case, work iterate backwards until you find how much methanol you want to add, and find appropriate nozzles.
Last edited by Tiago; 01-19-2005 at 09:56 AM.
#12
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (59)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,010
Likes: 46
From: Virginia
i'll put the file up when i get home.
steve. i appreicate the input and would love to see where you get your data from.
where do i find what most methanol burning drasters put their a/f at? on gasoline scale & methanol scale?
where did you find that the methanol octane is 100?
i am just relaying from what i found from about 5 hours of searching on the internet..
i know that if you just were able to watch lambda it would not matter.. but most people are looking at gasoline programmed meters.
steve. i appreicate the input and would love to see where you get your data from.
where do i find what most methanol burning drasters put their a/f at? on gasoline scale & methanol scale?
where did you find that the methanol octane is 100?
i am just relaying from what i found from about 5 hours of searching on the internet..
i know that if you just were able to watch lambda it would not matter.. but most people are looking at gasoline programmed meters.
#14
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (59)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,010
Likes: 46
From: Virginia
Originally Posted by 8KickassRS9
wouldnt it jus be easier to add the methanols effect on the octane rating for the equation instead of all that?
link was updated a little Link to Calculator Spreadsheet
Last edited by MIGHTYMOUSE; 05-13-2013 at 11:00 PM.
#15
re
Originally Posted by MIGHTYMOUSE
i dont know what you mean.. i dont think so.. show me it worked out.
link was updated a little http://home.comcast.net/~deezuns/Gasohol.htm
full excel file http://home.comcast.net/~deezuns/gasohol.xls
link was updated a little http://home.comcast.net/~deezuns/Gasohol.htm
full excel file http://home.comcast.net/~deezuns/gasohol.xls
#16
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (59)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,010
Likes: 46
From: Virginia
i just re checked the links, they work for me.. you need microsoft excel to use them.. you need windows xp to view the first one or right click save as to get the second one.
i dont think an average octane would be as exact and i still cannot figure out what you are talking about without it worked out on here. its certainly possible the way i worked it out could be more complicated.. but its allready done for you
i dont think an average octane would be as exact and i still cannot figure out what you are talking about without it worked out on here. its certainly possible the way i worked it out could be more complicated.. but its allready done for you
#18
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (59)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,010
Likes: 46
From: Virginia
john, at that point you have to pay attention to your octane level and decide for yourself if it is possible..
can you make 1200hp on straight methanol.. i certainly do believe so.
sjh, i have been reading all afternoon.. i see your point about just shooting for say a .8 rich lambda for either fuel and that 5.0 afr of methanol will show up as 11.5 afr of gasoline (on a gasoline scale)
that would mean all my work was a waste of time.
what i cannot figure is how the best running/longest lasting alky/pump gas cars that i know of have air fuel ratios that dip into the low 10's.. (i thought my calculation was right based on that sotp measurement and comparison)
by the lambda rule the should be able to safely run the same afr with methanol as without it. and that just seems too easy for all the hard time and no answers i've seen on the net and on this board in the past..and then you just throw in a 1-liner here after i spent all last night trying to find it my own way.
my second comment is on the octane. if you are certain that meth is only 100octane or so then that would mean i am making over 830rwhp on 366ci with barely 95 octane?
can you make 1200hp on straight methanol.. i certainly do believe so.
sjh, i have been reading all afternoon.. i see your point about just shooting for say a .8 rich lambda for either fuel and that 5.0 afr of methanol will show up as 11.5 afr of gasoline (on a gasoline scale)
that would mean all my work was a waste of time.
what i cannot figure is how the best running/longest lasting alky/pump gas cars that i know of have air fuel ratios that dip into the low 10's.. (i thought my calculation was right based on that sotp measurement and comparison)
by the lambda rule the should be able to safely run the same afr with methanol as without it. and that just seems too easy for all the hard time and no answers i've seen on the net and on this board in the past..and then you just throw in a 1-liner here after i spent all last night trying to find it my own way.
my second comment is on the octane. if you are certain that meth is only 100octane or so then that would mean i am making over 830rwhp on 366ci with barely 95 octane?
#19
Originally Posted by MIGHTYMOUSE
my second comment is on the octane. if you are certain that meth is only 100 octane or so then that would mean i am making over 830rwhp on 366ci with barely 95 octane?
#20
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (59)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,010
Likes: 46
From: Virginia
i was looking online and there are cars making over 3000hp with straight methanol.. its the btu's thats more important than the octane i guess...
gotta figure out what to do with btu's to estimate hp capability since octane wont help figure it out then
*john the car ran perfectly at that level for 4000 miles until i floored it after changing fuel injectors* safe to me.
gotta figure out what to do with btu's to estimate hp capability since octane wont help figure it out then
*john the car ran perfectly at that level for 4000 miles until i floored it after changing fuel injectors* safe to me.