sts size
saturn.i posted here cause you guys have the most sts info on the forums i've seen.
i want to do a remote mount setup for a 240sx. but i don't know what turbo to use.
i saw that the sts system comes with a t04 60 trim. but that is for your gigantic 5.7 liter engine. what size turbo can/should i use for my little 2.4 liter engine? i know i am not gonna have as much gas flowing so i dont think it will spool as fast. and i won't have to have as many cfm as you guys would. i want full boost at 3k.
and to all you haters out there, don't waste your time with this thread. sts is awesome.
Thanks Dave (Quicksilverado). I would be glad to help on anyway I can.
240sx.org is also a good source of info.
The kit for the Civic/Integra in not released yet, but should be fairly soon.
Do you know why they started the whole remote turbo thing? LACK OF SPACE. When a good turbo kit for an LS1 costs 5K+ because of all the crap you have to move and all the custom stuff required it fiscally makes sense to toss the turbo in the back. You can buy a rev hard manifold for your car for under 400 bucks. On a car like that you will spend more money for a system that is going to be laggier than a front mounted system. Same goes for a Civic, when turbo manifolds are readily available for under 400 dollars I see no reason to run an STS kit.
Trending Topics
trtturbo~ thanks for the help, i sent you an e-mail already tho.
eviltwins~ thanks for the info, but i really don't care why they started. i had the idea to do it on my saturn before i saw that there was a kit already. why does it matter to you why i want to do it? it's something i've always been interested in and i want to try it. and btw, fiscally it's cheaper to do a remote mount on a 240sx as well. you need a little more then a manifold for a turbo, incase you didn't know.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
If you're set on a non-ball bearing turbo, I'd go with either a GT32, or GT35 depending on how much hp you want. Again, I can get you amazing deals on these as well

Lets compare them, shall we.
STS: additional piping from motor to turbo, additional piping back from turbo to motor, expensive scavenge pump to take oil from turbo to motor.
Conventional: Reliable cast manifold, short charge piping, bolt up to stock cat location, NO expensive fluid pump, NO masses of piping going to back of the car, less lag
I just built a turbo setup for a friends 240SX using the RH manifold, a T67, 3.5" downpipe, big AA intercooler, and all 3 inch charge piping, the ENTIRE THING cost 2700 bucks, top to bottom, sans engine management. If you think you can do it cheaper than that using a remote mount setup, you're wrong. The rev hard manifold we picked up for 375. To get the same results out of the rear mount kit you need all that extra piping, a brace to mount the turbo to, a 300+ dollar fluid pump, and then the cost of the charge piping to get the air back up to the front of the car.
Hey, if you want to spend more money for a system with more lag, go ahead, be my guest. What do I know anyways
if you want more then i would fit a larger cold housing on and leave the hot allown (as long as you have one of the bigger once on). there are people with 2.0 ltr evos running the GT35 cold side on a GT30 hot. works well on 2.0ltrs, but may be a bit restictive on . 2.4.
if you want anymore then just run a GT35R (thats with the ball bearings) and stand back as the turbo will amke a easy 5-600 bhp. just make sure you engine can take it!
thanks Chris.


