Dyno numbers before / after alkyl
It’s nothing exceptional because it’s the 6PSI Vortech kit, but I never saw a real comparison before/after and maybe I can help someone.
Old numbers: 384 RWHP, 405 TORQUE @ 5 PSI
With: stock filter, TTS long tubes + cats, Corsa catback, 21* timing, 10.5 – 11.0 AFR
New numbers: 372 RWHP, 405 TORQUE @ 5 PSI (60* Celsius)
With: FIPK filter, stock exhaust manifolds and cats, Corsa catback, 21* timing, 10.5 – 11.0 AFR
Final numbers: 410 RWHP, 417 TORQUE @ 5 PSI (28* Celsius)
With: FIPK filter, stock exhaust manifolds and cats, Corsa catback, 17* timing, 12.5 AFR, 4 GPH 50% ethanol
AFR was measured injecting 4GPH of water alone. Alcohol also uses oxygen and modify the WB readings big time.
If I consider the temperature difference it’s clear from where the additional 10% power is coming from:
Without WI = 60 Celsius = 140F = 333 Kelvin
With WI = 28 Celsius = 82F = 301 Kelvin
333 / 301 = 1.106 = +10% air
Clear? It’s from pV = nRT
With bigger nozzles I see a power hole at the beginning of the spray: at 3200 – 3600 rpm it looses up to 40 HP, the rest of the curve is the same. The graph shows the 4 and the 8GPH nozzle.
I tried different timing curves (up to 21*) but I saw no power increase, absolutely nothing. With more timing I also need more alcohol to avoid KR (road tuning) and the power hole becomes bigger. At the end 4GPH + 17* timing is the best combination for my level of boost.
I also increased timing in different rpm ranges, not only at WOT, but it didn’t help either.
I could now put a smaller pulley… but I won’t do it. I reached my goal!

Stefano
Last edited by BOONE; Jun 3, 2005 at 08:15 AM.
The bogs comes for sure from the alcohol (or from the water, difficult to say). I could see more power loss with more liquid.
You can buy 96% ethanol in every shop here as fuel for small kitchen burners (Swiss cheese fondue).
If you buy it as a solvent you have to pay an extra environment tax (VOC - volatile organic compounds). Ethanol is about $2.2 per liter, methanol (as solvent) more than double.
AFR: we went leaner than 10.5-11 but it didn't change the curve.
The biggest surprise is that the timing doesn't affect the power at all. And this is measured timing, not only what I set in the PCM. If it goes lower than 17 you see a clear loss. Somehow it's the limit.
How much timing are you guys running?
The bogs comes for sure from the alcohol (or from the water, difficult to say). I could see more power loss with more liquid.
You can buy 96% ethanol in every shop here as fuel for small kitchen burners (Swiss cheese fondue).
If you buy it as a solvent you have to pay an extra environment tax (VOC - volatile organic compounds). Ethanol is about $2.2 per liter, methanol (as solvent) more than double.
AFR: we went leaner than 10.5-11 but it didn't change the curve.
The biggest surprise is that the timing doesn't affect the power at all. And this is measured timing, not only what I set in the PCM. If it goes lower than 17 you see a clear loss. Somehow it's the limit.
How much timing are you guys running?
Trending Topics
No progressive controller, no smaller pulley - as said I reached my goal. 410 RWHP is about 450 at the crank = 50% more than stock with the 6# Vortech. That's OK for me.
100% Alcohol and safety: I build chemical plants, sometimes with flammable liquids, and knowing what can happen I really won't go higher than 50%.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
For what it's worth we were running between 18-19deg of timing on 14psi with straight meth NP on my truck. I added some C16 one night just for added protection and have no issues running 14-15psi at the track. That's when I got my 110mph traps.
I would think you should be able to increase timing since you have more of a safety factor built into the burn..
I may run some kind of alky system but I dont want to sacrifice my washer tank, I actually use that to clean off my windshield sometimes!
Rick
Rick
Something inteesting: with no WI or just with the 4GPH nozzle I see 6PSI (on the road). The higher the quantity (up to 10GPH) the lower the boost (about 4 PSI max). The blower can only move a certain amount of air, hot air, and produce a certain pressure. When you cool it down the pressure will obviously decrease. The air quantity (weight) will remain the same.
What is better, high prssure with high temperature or low pressure with low temperature? Higher pressure will push air faster trough the valves, but this air will be "lighter" because of the thermal expansion.
All in all is it the same?
The goal was that extra power keeping everything stock: engine, A4 trans and 2.73 diff. Also to be able to go back to stock in few hours.
I saw the Vortech kit as the only way to get there. Nitro would be another possibility, but I don't like it

Yes, the cylinder charge needs to be stable. The lower the octane rating, the more stable it must be.
Rick
I would think you should be able to increase timing since you have more of a safety factor built into the burn..
I may run some kind of alky system but I dont want to sacrifice my washer tank, I actually use that to clean off my windshield sometimes!
We run more timing, and more boost. Its all dependant on the person, but generally, across the board, the timing is advanced, and the boost can be raised as well. 26psi+23degree timing=
I think our stock timing is around 16-17. I know people that get these 91 chips only put about 19 degrees or so in them, which is small.
Also, it all depends on the engine. Even on LS1's, you can add timing and it wont do anything. I can assure you the GN guys just like the LS1 guys will play with the timing to try to get the most power out of their setup, once they reach the max power, theyll just have to leave it be.
If you really want, I can ask what the stock timing is, but it would really be irrelevant, seeing as we up the timing anyway.


