Why not to buy STS part 2
I see his point as well.
Injectors are a mood point as neither company supplys them.
Most do buy headers and if your compairing the STS to the phamspeed you need to add in the costs of the bigger turbo and FMIC.
So now your fairly close to the same dollars spent even after you pay for labor.
The 3500 is not a normal price, he has a connection somewhere.
"Next debate.
This time I will explain things as good as possible.
We are still in the street setup's. No race car's, not looking for 800 HP etc.
Lets say we are using a 346 longblock again with whatever Turbo setup you want. Its intercooled and makes 500 HP to the tire with 9psi.
Now we want a little more the cheep way.
We can turn boost up and run 11psi and Alki injection or we could spray it with a shot of nitrous.
93 octane is our limit on fuel but we will see a higher octane with the alki setup.
OUR goal is simple. What makes better power? What will produce better track results?
The nitrous is a 2nd power adder and cools great but from what I have seen you cant really up the boost any.
Uping the boost on the alki is the key as you see more octane, it cools very well and seems like it might be safer.
The Nitrous makes **** spool faster, does the alki?"
this was my only reply in the other thread.
"tie this in to your sts part 2 thread... Great thread by the way. Would spraying a small shot outta the hole help the STS kit spool faster and give better track times, or are you just getting to complicated on the setup and tuning? I know about the puddling debate, which is why I said small shot."
the sts turbo kit like all the other turbo kits and superchargers will put your car in a class of cars that is almost to fast for the street.and like I said its all about having fun
My powerdyne made 400 rwhp with no intercooler, so the ATI should get you to 430 or 440 intercooled.
Something to think about.
-Geoff
My powerdyne made 400 rwhp with no intercooler, so the ATI should get you to 430 or 440 intercooled.
Something to think about.
-Geoff
Maybe but look at the price difference now. The STS kit is much cheeper.
Hell the install alone is 2x more. I believe the STS would make similar peak and better numbers throughout the curve. Remember the ATI dosen't see peak boost until in the 6000 RPM range where the turbo's make peak boost much faster providing more power in the lower RPM's.
Also if your running a 98/99 exhaust manifolds your gonna want headers. The 01/02 manifolds work well but the early years suck.
How much more room do you have to go on a P1SC?
They cant make much more then 9psi on a stock motor from the cars I have seen.
Good comparision though.
This is what were looking for.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
cheap and performance do not go hand in hand fwiw. Once you start getting boost greedy things break, prepare for that to happen financially or have a credit card in hand to take to your nearest shop.
Sorry to be downer but its part of the game when modifying your vehicle.
Since you are on a stock bottom end, be conservative on your boost level and your tune and your **** will hold up.

Better turbo's wont change the fact that cooler exhaust gases = less exhaust velocity = longer spool time
You do need to replace them everytime you take the cap off though. The problem is caused by the lack of support on that side of the oil cap. There is nothing for it to grab on to.

Hell the install alone is 2x more. I believe the STS would make similar peak and better numbers throughout the curve.
Personally, if you only want 400 RWHP, just go heads and cam. My car put down 385/385 and I drove it down to the Thunder Shootout last year, raced it, and drove it back. Plus the cam is so mild it sounds stock. These LSX engines have some of the best flowing heads ever produced by an OEM. If you want the MOST reliable setup, this is the way to go. You can get 400 pretty easily with just a little more cam than I have.
-Geoff
STS is joke. I wouldn't mess with STS again even if the damn kit was free. It sounded good, and seemed to make good power (never dynoed). But everything else about it sucked. Fit and finish of the parts straight up sucked. There was a lot of **** I had to modify because it didn't come from STS right. Whoever said 8 hour installation time in your driveway can go to #^$! themselves. Turbo lag... yes there is turbo lag. I had the T67, so the smaller turbo would have spooled a little quicker. Also I don't care what anyone says, but that turbo does hang down very low - even after tweaking everything to the max, and playing with the turbine housing... I got this weird oil leak from my valley cover. It would leak oil under boost. I checked out the PCV system thoroughly and I still leaked oil. No way would 5psi create that much blowby in my healthy engine. I could fill up a whole thread with how much this system sucks. Also if you don't have the stock I pipe the install will be even more pain. Ask me how I know. I had to buy a stock I pipe because the flowmaster one wasn't bent correctly among other variables...
Some people might like the STS, but as with dicks I don't like turbos in rear, but if that's your thing... okay.
Online everyone loves STS... but that's online. Everyone has a 10 second car AND is an expert mechanic. But in the real world you will find that a lot of people have problems with this stupid *** kit. The two things STS didn't lie about were that it sounds cool, and makes good power, other than that forget it.
Whenever I decide to do it all again... I'll do it right and definitely go H/C or ProCharger. I'd go front mount turbo if I didn't have to worry about visual inspection and had more cash. A front mount turbo is truly the cool
way to go. Last edited by NavySS; Jul 20, 2005 at 06:51 PM. Reason: forgot something...
STS is joke. I wouldn't mess with STS again even if the damn kit was free. It sounded good, and seemed to make good power (never dynoed). But everything else about it sucked. Fit and finish of the parts straight up sucked. There was a lot of **** I had to modify because it didn't come from STS right. Whoever said 8 hour installation time in your driveway can go to #^$! themselves. Turbo lag... yes there is turbo lag. I had the T67, so the smaller turbo would have spooled a little quicker. Also I don't care what anyone says, but that turbo does hang down very low - even after tweaking everything to the max, and playing with the turbine housing... I got this weird oil leak from my valley cover. It would leak oil under boost. I checked out the PCV system thoroughly and I still leaked oil. No way would 5psi create that much blowby in my healthy engine. I could fill up a whole thread with how much this system sucks.
Some people might like the STS, but as with dicks I don't like turbos in rear, but if that's your thing... okay.
Online everyone loves STS... but that's online. Everyone has a 10 second car AND is an expert mechanic. But in the real world you will find that a lot of people have problems with this stupid *** kit. The two things STS didn't lie about were that it sounds cool, and makes good power, other than that forget it.
Whenever I decide to do it all again... I'll do it right and definitely go H/C or ProCharger. I'd go front mount turbo if I didn't have to worry about visual inspection and had more cash. A front mount turbo is truly the cool
way to go.oh please your the clownshoe who fucked up his whole install...EVERYONE GO SEARCH HIS POSTS before he deletes them. Tell me im wrong..i remember some of the dumbest questions ever from you. Stop acting like it was sts when in fact it was your chicken gumbo inept skills
Ya im sure it was installed right, esp after this thread. I wonder how many leaks there was nevermind other issues. Bash your idiocy not the kit
https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-induction/298873-wtf-sts-look.html
Last edited by PurEvl; Jul 20, 2005 at 06:56 PM.





