ls6 vs ls1 intake boosted
#3
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
Re: ls6 vs ls1 intake boosted
[quote]Originally posted by RyanJackson:
<strong>LS6 intake = $350-400 for some gain.
Tuning = $400-500 for BIG gains.</strong><hr></blockquote>
not always
if you can't flow anymore w/ the old manifold, tuning gets you now where <img src="images/icons/smile.gif" border="0">
upper RPM is the thing to look at
[ November 27, 2001: Message edited by: y2khawk ]
[ November 27, 2001: Message edited by: y2khawk ]</p>
<strong>LS6 intake = $350-400 for some gain.
Tuning = $400-500 for BIG gains.</strong><hr></blockquote>
not always
if you can't flow anymore w/ the old manifold, tuning gets you now where <img src="images/icons/smile.gif" border="0">
upper RPM is the thing to look at
[ November 27, 2001: Message edited by: y2khawk ]
[ November 27, 2001: Message edited by: y2khawk ]</p>
#4
SSU Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: ls6 vs ls1 intake boosted
true, but i see the "adjusted WOT timing curve"
i still say tuning first, LS6 intake second. dont wait a year for LS1-edit ('98) to come out.
i still say tuning first, LS6 intake second. dont wait a year for LS1-edit ('98) to come out.
#5
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
Re: ls6 vs ls1 intake boosted
[quote]Originally posted by RyanJackson:
<strong>true, but i see the "adjusted WOT timing curve"
</strong><hr></blockquote>
yes, but see the dip in the bottom curve at about 4200 there's your adjustment.
there are no changes in the advance in the part of the curve where the manifold comes into play.
I have the logs to show the increase in flow from the manifold <img src="images/icons/smile.gif" border="0">
<strong>true, but i see the "adjusted WOT timing curve"
</strong><hr></blockquote>
yes, but see the dip in the bottom curve at about 4200 there's your adjustment.
there are no changes in the advance in the part of the curve where the manifold comes into play.
I have the logs to show the increase in flow from the manifold <img src="images/icons/smile.gif" border="0">
#7
SSU Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: ls6 vs ls1 intake boosted
oh dont doubt the flow of the intake...escpecially in an FI app. but if i had $400 and a barely idling, non-tuned twin turbo, the PCM would already be in the mail.
Trending Topics
#9
On The Tree
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Itasca, IL
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: ls6 vs ls1 intake boosted
Since my engine is already out of the car, I'm getting a used LS6 intake just for convenience sake, figuring it's easier now than later, and an ything that will help flow better will decrease boost a bit and save my engine... I'm getting the PCM done as well, once everything else is together in the car.
Also, doesn't something need to be ground down to allow the LS6 intake to fit?
[ November 28, 2001: Message edited by: Kilroy's 99 TA ]</p>
Also, doesn't something need to be ground down to allow the LS6 intake to fit?
[ November 28, 2001: Message edited by: Kilroy's 99 TA ]</p>
#10
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Woodlyn, PA
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: ls6 vs ls1 intake boosted
Correct me if I'm wrong.. but torque and detonation is what kills motors. Boost will only provide enough pressure to lift heads and pop gaskets.
#12
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
Re: ls6 vs ls1 intake boosted
yes steve, stock heads and cam
detonation kills motors. the increase in cylinder pressure from detonation is what lifts the heads and pops gaskets. extreme boost will do it, but then you have other worries.
torque kills driveshafts <img src="images/icons/grin.gif" border="0">
detonation kills motors. the increase in cylinder pressure from detonation is what lifts the heads and pops gaskets. extreme boost will do it, but then you have other worries.
torque kills driveshafts <img src="images/icons/grin.gif" border="0">