Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Got me under Compression

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-14-2002, 07:19 PM
  #1  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (48)
 
smokinHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Columbus, ohio
Posts: 7,354
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Got me under Compression

Ok over on ls1.com I read up that you can change the compression ratio with just the head gaskets. This is good news to me seems like a cheap way to get the cr down with out the expense of new heads.

Ok now what C/R should i get??Choices below

How much do you think labor is? you dont have to drop the motor to do this do you??

My goals are 500rwhp on pump gas (93-94)with the T-76 kit.

1.7mm/.067" = 9.85:1
2.0mm/.078" = 9.6:1
2.5mm/.098" = 9.25:1
2.8mm/.112" = 8.95:1
Stock 1.3mm/.054" = 10.1:1

Cablebandit this might be a good way of getting rid of detonation cheaply.
Old 03-14-2002, 07:56 PM
  #2  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (5)
 
y2khawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Olmsted Falls, OH
Posts: 4,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: Got me under Compression

Lower is better <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />

FWIW, i'm going to a hair under 9:1 and the plan is to attempt 600 RWHP on pump gas <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" /> if i get there is the question.

With the heads and cam i think i can do it. We shall see.

But, i say go 9:1 and run 12 psi <img border="0" alt="[hail]" title="" src="graemlins/gr_hail.gif" />
Old 03-14-2002, 09:51 PM
  #3  
Tire Smoking Tranny Blowing Director
iTrader: (2)
 
Cool28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Barto PA
Posts: 2,130
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: Got me under Compression

Thats well and good but I would think it would make it easyer to blow a gasket.
Old 03-15-2002, 07:51 AM
  #4  
SJH
TECH Regular
 
SJH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: the moon
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Got me under Compression

It may be cheap and easy but it's the WORST way to do it.
This type of head greatly relies on the tight squish area for power, response and mixture motion.
The tighter the better. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
A thick gasket kills this area and you'll be much more prone to detonation compared to doing it right with pistons.
Steve

<small>[ March 15, 2002, 07:52 AM: Message edited by: SJH ]</small>
Old 03-15-2002, 10:13 AM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (48)
 
smokinHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Columbus, ohio
Posts: 7,354
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: Got me under Compression

Now im confused, I though by lowering th CP you would get rid of more detonation. I know that changing out your pistons is the best way of doing it rather then heads or gaskets, but will changing out gaskets help at all for runnig pump gas at higher boost?
Old 03-15-2002, 10:31 AM
  #6  
SJH
TECH Regular
 
SJH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: the moon
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Got me under Compression

The area between the piston and the flat portion of the chamber is called the squish or quench area.
<img src="http://www.aera.org/Members/EngineTech/G597.gif" alt="" />
Opening this area up will increase your octane requirement.Now will the lower compression vs the trade off a a less effective squish area be worth it? I don't know.
I personally would not do it that way, but that's just me
Steve
Old 03-15-2002, 11:40 AM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (48)
 
smokinHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Columbus, ohio
Posts: 7,354
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: Got me under Compression

Anyone else what to chime in on this question? <img border="0" title="" alt="[Sad]" src="gr_sad.gif" />
Old 03-15-2002, 11:59 AM
  #8  
TECH Addict
 
Blackbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bellevue, Wa
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: Got me under Compression

This says it all. SJH knows his shiznit. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />

http://www.ralphsmachine.com/Compression_2.ivn
Old 03-15-2002, 03:28 PM
  #9  
SJH
TECH Regular
 
SJH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: the moon
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Got me under Compression

Blackbird, That is a very good tech article and well worth reading. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />

This quote from that article should get the attention of anybody looking to run thick headgaskets for a bandaid compression drop."This is why the piston manufacturers tell you that a 10 to 1 engine is less likely to detonate with an 0.035 quench height than a 9 to 1 engine with .060 inch of quench. And, they are of course absolutely spot-on-the-money right.
"


Steve
Old 03-16-2002, 09:41 AM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
 
MelloYellow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Centrifugal City
Posts: 1,986
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Got me under Compression

Yes, the quench argument comes up.

All I know is that real world, the LT1 Supercharged guys experimented a lot with thicker gaskets. The quench argument came up but was never an issue. Noone using thicker gaskets ever saw any detonation. A lot of them used double size or larger gaskets. I'm only adding 40% to the thickness of my gasket. .7mm

I know Nick at ARE has no problem going from stock .054" -> .067" or +20%. He didn't mention any reservations when I brought up the .078" +40% thicker gasket.

LT1's ran gaskets up to double with no probs. So even the LS1 .112" might be ok.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/zero...376253#2376253

<small>[ March 17, 2002, 10:04 AM: Message edited by: MelloYellow ]</small>
Old 03-16-2002, 09:50 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
 
MelloYellow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Centrifugal City
Posts: 1,986
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Got me under Compression

Btw, what is the stock quench measurement?

Where would you end up w/quench using a .024" thicker gasket?

TIA
Old 03-17-2002, 09:11 AM
  #12  
SJH
TECH Regular
 
SJH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: the moon
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Got me under Compression

stock is about .045" - a stock graphite compressed gasket is about .052" and with a positive .007" deck height.
Old 03-17-2002, 09:06 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (48)
 
smokinHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Columbus, ohio
Posts: 7,354
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Re: Got me under Compression

I would think that the reason you drop compression is to lower the chance of detonation so you can use pump gas.
<img border="0" title="" alt="[Eek!]" src="gr_eek2.gif" />
Has any one seen if this actually works?



Quick Reply: Got me under Compression



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35 AM.