Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Has anyone "de-stroked" an LS1 for boost?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 06:07 PM
  #1  
2000 Tran Zam's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
From: Ahwatukee, Az
Default Has anyone "de-stroked" an LS1 for boost?

Lets say you were to destroke the motor. They say that it will help in higher RPM's and really take advantage of the turbo its self. Are there any advantages of doing this? Has anyone ever done this?
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 06:35 PM
  #2  
black01_WS6's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,857
Likes: 0
From: Fort Myers, FL.
Default

I don't know about the ls1, But I have a friend that is doing it to his turbo 03 cobra this winter. You would need some killer vlavetrain upgrades. its at least a woth a look into.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 06:38 PM
  #3  
2000 Tran Zam's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
From: Ahwatukee, Az
Default

ya, im not 100% how they work. i think it might just work better with mustang motor because they have 2-4 valves per cylinder correct? Maybe thats why you never hear of anyone doing that on ls1's...
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 07:29 PM
  #4  
Wicked_Hugger99's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,227
Likes: 1
From: enterprise, AL
Default

dunno bout the ls1 but Hot Rod mag de-stroked a LT1 down to 302 back in 1997. It was an N/A setup though
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 07:33 PM
  #5  
2000 Tran Zam's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
From: Ahwatukee, Az
Default

Originally Posted by Wicked_Hugger99
dunno bout the ls1 but Hot Rod mag de-stroked a LT1 down to 302 back in 1997. It was an N/A setup though
wouldnt that be pointless in an NA setup though?
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 07:34 PM
  #6  
slow trap's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
From: tennessee
Default

i would think an improperly sized turbo would be the only reason to destroke your motor or if you was in a racing class where only so many cubes is allowed.the extra rpm would be a factor also.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 07:44 PM
  #7  
gnx7's Avatar
TECH Junkie
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 277
From: San Francisco, CA
Default

Harlan spun his 347 (stock block/crank/main caps) to 8,000rpm+ and made over 1000hp! His Fbody went low 8's@170mph+ at over 3,000lbs.

How how do you plan on spinning the engine?

I'm spinning a stock '99 shortblock with Katech rod bolts to 7,000 daily.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 07:53 PM
  #8  
v8pwr's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 538
Likes: 2
From: florida
Default

If you would like to see the advantages of an over square cylinder using forced induction just look @ W2W's recent build Casper . They used an 6.0 block and a forged crank , Callies I believe , to achieve 35x cubes and well the power and performance speak for itself . 6.85 @ 206mph or something really close to that .
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 08:00 PM
  #9  
Malicious's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 1
From: Tulsa, OK
Default

I know someone did a 302 LS1 a few years bakc, saw it in a magazine... I haven't seen one done with boost before but that doesnt go to say it hasnt happened, kinda curious myself =)
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 08:19 PM
  #10  
CAT3's Avatar
Restricted User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 7,603
Likes: 0
From: Sierra Vista, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by Malicious
I know someone did a 302 LS1 a few years bakc, saw it in a magazine... I haven't seen one done with boost before but that doesnt go to say it hasnt happened, kinda curious myself =)
That guy is on this board, but unfortunately cannot remember his SN. I talked to him about 3yrs ago, when I entertained the idea of destroking to 302 for a throwback to the 69 Penske/Sunoco Race Car. I love the sounds of American muscle at 9k+ rpms. Now, as stated, add a turbo or two to that and one killer deal. GL.

Charlie
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 08:28 PM
  #11  
Pro Stock John's Avatar
LS1Tech Co-Founder
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 45,306
Likes: 1,745
From: Chicago, IL
Default

The GM/Westech pewter car from around 1999 had a custom engine in there, it was a destroked engine. I drove it twice. It was like a 3.900 bore with a 4.8 crankshaft.

I don't see any advantage in running less cubes for us.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 08:49 PM
  #12  
BOOSTNSS's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
From: Bourne Mass
Default

W2W builds then casper is a de stroked 6.0L. like a 3.5 stroke
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 08:50 PM
  #13  
BOOSTNSS's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
From: Bourne Mass
Default

W2W builds them casper is a de stroked 6.0L. like a 3.5 stroke
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 08:53 PM
  #14  
Deckhand's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 0
From: Corpus Christi, TX
Default

save alot of the trouble and use a 293ci 4.8L hehe
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 09:34 PM
  #15  
Wicked_Hugger99's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,227
Likes: 1
From: enterprise, AL
Default

Originally Posted by 2000 Tran Zam
wouldnt that be pointless in an NA setup though?
they did just to commerate the 30yr anniversary. Pushed about 400 flywheel
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 09:56 PM
  #16  
JETmn's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Default

I was looking at doing the same exact thing. I was going to use a LS2 block and destroke it to 3.27". That would give you 329 ci and a great rod ratio. What kind of RPM can the valvetrain take in upgraded form?

Put a pair of 50 trim turbo's on there and you have 1,000 whp potential and full spool at 3k RPM.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 10:20 PM
  #17  
MUSTANGEATER's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 1
From: Belleville, IL
Default

Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
The GM/Westech pewter car from around 1999 had a custom engine in there, it was a destroked engine. I drove it twice. It was like a 3.900 bore with a 4.8 crankshaft.

I don't see any advantage in running less cubes for us.
Off Topic

Mccord actually had that motor or a similar 302 LS1 in his car the last time I talked to him.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 10:32 PM
  #18  
JZ 97 SS 1500's Avatar
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,725
Likes: 0
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

No reason to de-stroke the engine unless you are limited by class rules or turbo rules.

Jose
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 10:51 PM
  #19  
slow's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,150
Likes: 7
From: Orlando
Default

I've debated doing it just for my 5.0 friends who say "but you have 44 extra cubes"

But if that is the best reason to do it, I would be better off building a 370 motor "cause that is my ASC build number"

Ryan
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2005 | 10:55 PM
  #20  
JZ 97 SS 1500's Avatar
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,725
Likes: 0
From: Huntsville, AL
Default

To be honest with you I would love to see that...lol.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:22 PM.