My STS project
Thread Starter
Launching!
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
My STS project Well sence I got my STS kit there has been conflicts of interest the whole damn time! well most of the fabbing is complete tell me what you think of it
http://members.***.net/moconnor4ss/STS.htm
I will have numbers and a dyno tonight I hope.
http://members.***.net/moconnor4ss/STS.htm
I will have numbers and a dyno tonight I hope.
TECH Addict
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 1
From: Bellevue, Wa
not too shabby at all.
interesting choice to have no airflow to the fmic.
also the pipe coming under the K member, if your lowered at all your going to wish you had it come up alot quicker than you did. not a big deal to fix if you hit it too much.
nice stealth place for the meth tank.
good job.
interesting choice to have no airflow to the fmic.
also the pipe coming under the K member, if your lowered at all your going to wish you had it come up alot quicker than you did. not a big deal to fix if you hit it too much.
nice stealth place for the meth tank.
good job.
Originally Posted by Blackbird
not too shabby at all.
interesting choice to have no airflow to the fmic.
also the pipe coming under the K member, if your lowered at all your going to wish you had it come up alot quicker than you did. not a big deal to fix if you hit it too much.
nice stealth place for the meth tank.
good job.
interesting choice to have no airflow to the fmic.
also the pipe coming under the K member, if your lowered at all your going to wish you had it come up alot quicker than you did. not a big deal to fix if you hit it too much.
nice stealth place for the meth tank.
good job.
I stuck a hose clamp on mine where it hits the ground over a hard bump with the worm screw down. I lose a hose clamp or 2 every week but my pipe is still in decent shape
Not to nitpick but I think the turbo is mounted too low.We ussually spin them up until they are .5" from the heat shield.That one looks level with the rear fully extended which would hang under the rear when on the ground.
Originally Posted by Slowhawk
Not to nitpick but I think the turbo is mounted too low.We ussually spin them up until they are .5" from the heat shield.That one looks level with the rear fully extended which would hang under the rear when on the ground.
Trending Topics
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo
Originally Posted by Blackbird
not too shabby at all.
interesting choice to have no airflow to the fmic.
also the pipe coming under the K member, if your lowered at all your going to wish you had it come up alot quicker than you did. not a big deal to fix if you hit it too much.
nice stealth place for the meth tank.
good job.
interesting choice to have no airflow to the fmic.
also the pipe coming under the K member, if your lowered at all your going to wish you had it come up alot quicker than you did. not a big deal to fix if you hit it too much.
nice stealth place for the meth tank.
good job.
Originally Posted by Blackbird
interesting choice to have no airflow to the fmic.
Guess his radiator works in a vacume as well. It's know to work like this, but rad gets less airflow as it takes a higher PSI to cross the increased fin area. I would be more concerned with efficiency in and airflow threw the intercooler as it seem a bit small. Cant really see a nice pic of the intercooler itself, sort of looks like a 2 core procharger unit. Good job man keep it up
TECH Addict
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 1
From: Bellevue, Wa
in the pics its sitting behind the support with no holes, thus the no airflow comment. it would be too far forward to get much if any of the air deflected up from the radiator.
for comparisons sake on my setup with the more common IC in the front with the cut bumper support behind, crusing down the freeway outside temp 64, IAT reads 66, short blasts at 5.5 psi IAT's stay the same or actually drop 2 degrees. thats a far cry from the 28 degree increase they are seeing. and yes I have the datalogs to prove it if you wish to see them.
so you can save the
I wasn't dissing his setup, just saying it was an interesting choice. I can fully understand doing it if the owner has no desire to cut up his car. they are just practicing a little give and take.
for comparisons sake on my setup with the more common IC in the front with the cut bumper support behind, crusing down the freeway outside temp 64, IAT reads 66, short blasts at 5.5 psi IAT's stay the same or actually drop 2 degrees. thats a far cry from the 28 degree increase they are seeing. and yes I have the datalogs to prove it if you wish to see them.
so you can save the
I wasn't dissing his setup, just saying it was an interesting choice. I can fully understand doing it if the owner has no desire to cut up his car. they are just practicing a little give and take. Last edited by Blackbird; Oct 13, 2005 at 09:59 AM.
