Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Blower Cam, for 6.0L 372c.i. motor.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-2003 | 12:27 AM
  #21  
BIGBOS's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member

 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 11,603
Likes: 0
From: Chi-Town, IL
Default Re: Blower Cam, for 6.0L 372c.i. motor.....

I plan to run 12psi on 93 octane, then when I get more $, I will do more fuel, and run 15-16 psi on race gas.... <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />

It was nice meeting you too, if I would of ran the 348 I would of also done 12psi on pump gas...just would of made less power..

I should make around 600rwhp... <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Old 04-05-2003 | 03:13 PM
  #22  
dug's Avatar
dug
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,721
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
Default Re: Blower Cam, for 6.0L 372c.i. motor.....

psj I disrespectfully disagree. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="gr_images/icons/tongue.gif" />

I still think the intake restriction should be taken into account when choosing a cam. Also, these peoples opinoins on cam specs, is their experience based off of roots type blowers or centrifugal blowers? These superchargers work entirely different.

Whatever, its bossmans car and hell do what ever he wants. Good luck to the both of you.
Old 04-06-2003 | 12:30 AM
  #23  
LINGENFELTER SS's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: CHICAGO
Default Re: Blower Cam, for 6.0L 372c.i. motor.....

Well I would do the iron block but,it would take me out of the bracket of competition of 346 to 348 class. If I would be in the strocker class I would do at least 383. Plus I like the sound of having a block that with the car. Ill be shooting for 600rwhp also. It should be intresting between both are choices. First I have to get used too the 500+ rwhp. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Big Grin]" src="gr_grin.gif" />
Old 04-06-2003 | 06:22 PM
  #24  
JimmyKash's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 0
From: Chi-Town
Default Re: Blower Cam, for 6.0L 372c.i. motor.....

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Pro Stock John:
<strong> I think those two would work similarly but I was told to stay around a 6 degree split... </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">the split should be determined by what the head flows...

dug---

the intake is PART of the restriction, but the exhaust is a big one too. The reason why you want a split duration with more duration on the exhaust side is that the exhaust cannot expel all the burnt gases from the chamber in a pressurized state too efficiently, so you hang the exhaust valve open for more duration to get as much out as possible before the next combustion event in the chamber.
Old 04-06-2003 | 11:36 PM
  #25  
BIGBOS's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member

 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 11,603
Likes: 0
From: Chi-Town, IL
Default Re: Blower Cam, for 6.0L 372c.i. motor.....

I'm defiently going to do a 6 degree split, and it will be more on the exhaust side...just not sure how big into the duration I want to go, I want the peak shift points to be right around 6700-6800

Something on a 114lsa....and as for duration/lift, I'm clueless as to what would be good for a 372
Old 04-07-2003 | 12:43 AM
  #26  
xtream1's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: La, Ca
Default Re: Blower Cam, for 6.0L 372c.i. motor.....

Is this going to be driven on the street and will it have to smog? I was told to stay below 224 duration for a street application with smog criteria.
Old 04-07-2003 | 07:36 AM
  #27  
BIGBOS's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member

 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 11,603
Likes: 0
From: Chi-Town, IL
Default Re: Blower Cam, for 6.0L 372c.i. motor.....

Yes, the car will be driven on the street everyday probably when its nice out...

Well the only smog test they do here in illinois is the OBD2 scan, if I pass that then I'm gravy, if I don't then they put me on the rollers...

But last time I plugges in a scanner, the only codes I had was a clutch code, and an A/C code, which probably wouldn't cause me to fail...

<small>[ April 07, 2003, 07:37 AM: Message edited by: BIGBOS ]</small>
Old 04-10-2003 | 01:29 AM
  #28  
Nickn20's Avatar
9 Second Club
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Default Re: Blower Cam, for 6.0L 372c.i. motor.....

230/236 113-114 LSA lift well that depends on the heads folks.
Old 04-10-2003 | 08:48 AM
  #29  
BIGBOS's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member

 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 11,603
Likes: 0
From: Chi-Town, IL
Default Re: Blower Cam, for 6.0L 372c.i. motor.....

The heads are TEA's S2's, w/73 cc chambers



Quick Reply: Blower Cam, for 6.0L 372c.i. motor.....



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:11 AM.