Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

3.23's or 3.42's???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 05:49 PM
  #1  
frcefed98's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,907
Likes: 6
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default 3.23's or 3.42's???

I want to swap out my 3.73's now that the race season is due to start in march....gotta make sure everything is good for some turbo passes.

Should I go either to 3.23's or 3.42's???? What would load the turbo better and get me the best passes?

Stall is a Vig 3800, 4L60E.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 06:45 PM
  #2  
Zombie's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 4
From: Las Vegas
Default

Why not 3.08s or even 2.73's?
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 08:21 PM
  #3  
2002 Trans Am's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,417
Likes: 0
From: Waldwick, NJ
Default

Is that the stock tranny ya got there? Hows it holding up on ya?

FI is so funny, I get ripped on for having 2.73s on my car and here is someone recommending to get them.....thats awesome
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 08:45 PM
  #4  
engineermike's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 3
Default

Of course, I would need more car info, but 3.08's or 2.73's shouldn't be out of the question. Take my car, for example:

3750 lb, 670 rwhp, should be good for 140 - 145 mph in the quarter.

25.5" tall tire, TH350, 10% converter slip.

Power peak is at 5800 rpm.

It tops out at ~145 mph at 6200 rpm with 2.73 gears. I know this because I ran it all the way to 150 mph on the dyno and the engine was tapped out.

Even with the 2.73's, it will still spin the Nitto's from 55 mph without even downshifting to 2nd gear.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 09:25 PM
  #5  
frcefed98's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,907
Likes: 6
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

I'd like a lil grunt from that a lower gear provides since our cars are dogs up here a mile high.

BUT it is interesting that engineermike is doing awesome with 2.73 as well as 2002 TA.

2002, stock tranny over 200+ passes still going strong...knocking on wood(Tax return is likely going to a TH350 swap)

How much more info would you need, what kind of specifics? I'll provide any info you need, but a quick run down can be gathered by glancing at my sig. My cam is a mismatch from my blower days (233/244 .578/.602) so it likes to spin high.

Keep the info coming
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 09:29 PM
  #6  
engineermike's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by frcefed98
I'd like a lil grunt from that a lower gear provides since our cars are dogs up here a mile high.

How much more info would you need, what kind of specifics? I'll provide any info you need, but a quick run down can be gathered by glancing at my sig.
Sounds like you need more boost. . .

What is your expected mph in the quarter? What tire height?

You'll appreciate the 2.73's when you lose the overdrive.

Your cam is probably not as bad as you think.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2006 | 09:38 PM
  #7  
frcefed98's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,907
Likes: 6
From: Albuquerque, NM
Default

15psi is my max for running at the track. I run on 28in ET Drags.
With the old S/C set up I was trapping 124-125 consistantly.
I want to break into the 10's(yes 10's pretty hard to do up here ) Best time with the s/c set up was 11.10@125
The turbo should put me comfortably into the 10's with the 3.73's but you never know.
J
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 01:11 AM
  #8  
Zombie's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 4
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
25.5" tall tire, TH350, 10% converter slip.

Power peak is at 5800 rpm.

It tops out at ~145 mph at 6200 rpm with 2.73 gears. I know this because I ran it all the way to 150 mph on the dyno and the engine was tapped out.
Hearing this worries me a little, I have a vig 3000 in my th400 and currently have 3.50 gears in the 9". I'm looking to move to 2.70's though. I haven't run the car yet.

You ran out of rpm in 3rd at 150 with the 2.73s? I plan on spinning mine to 6500 if it makes power there. FWIW, when I go under boost the converter goes to 5200 and stays at just 11psi. I wonder if i'm going to need a tighter converter.
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-2

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-5

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

 
story-9

10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 05:26 AM
  #9  
smokinHawk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,354
Likes: 1
From: Columbus, ohio
Default

well using your 28" tall tire when you switch to your Th350 keeping the 3.73's you'll top out at 140mph @ 6000rpm, or 151@ 6500rpm cruising @2400rpm @ 55mph
using that gear would probably be the best on the track, though street it may not be as desirable.
3.42's would take you to be able to 152mph@6000rpm or 165@6500rpm.
while cruising @2300rpm for 55mph
3.23s would take you to 161 and 175 respectivly with a cuise of 2100rpm@55mph

id do the 3.42s if it was me.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 10:26 AM
  #10  
2001-WS6's Avatar
9 Second Club
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 985
Likes: 7
From: Lake Orion, MI
Default

Here is my favorite tranny/gear/tire MPH calculator. These are peak numbers and do not include the driveline loss or converter loss.

If you're not looking to make a parachute pass at the track then 3.42s will work very well for any automatic.

The 3.50s with a TH400 have too much grunt on the street, but the CD player can cover them on the freeway most of the time.

Rick
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 10:48 AM
  #11  
Pro Stock John's Avatar
LS1Tech Co-Founder
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 45,343
Likes: 1,770
From: Chicago, IL
Default

Did anyone understand Rick's last sentence?

Force, what rpm will you be shifting?
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 10:55 AM
  #12  
kp's Avatar
kp
8 Second Club
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,852
Likes: 1
From: Knoxville, TN
Default

Dont forget about converter slip, I go through @ 138mph at 6500rpm with a 3.70 and 28" tall tires.. Naturally a lot depends on when your motor stops making power, if it dies at 6K then gear accordingly.

Your 1st gear with the 4l60 is 3.06, TH350 is 2.52 or something so when you switch transmissions your 3.73 wont be as bad as you think if it can pull the RPM on the other end..
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 10:57 AM
  #13  
Zombie's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 4
From: Las Vegas
Default

FWIW, a t76 car that i tuned has a 3.42 rear with a th400. It's too much gear for it. It feels ok in 1st, better in 2nd and 3rd feels like you grabbed a 150 shot! It has a tight 3000 stall, goes to 5200 with 13psi. He's trying to go to 2.73's
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 11:04 AM
  #14  
bc56f100's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: Pensacola
Default

So by reading all the post so far it looks like a 2.73 would be a good gear for an auto. But how about the 6-speed guys? Would a 3.08 or 3.23 be better? I'm sure the 2.73 would be a little low for us right?

very good thread by the way!
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 11:27 AM
  #15  
2001-WS6's Avatar
9 Second Club
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 985
Likes: 7
From: Lake Orion, MI
Default

Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
Did anyone understand Rick's last sentence?

Force, what rpm will you be shifting?
Hmmm... I'm not sure I understand it either.

I was reffering to the cruising RPMs on the freeway and the amount of noise that a person would experience. I can live with the noise level of a three speed tranny and a 3.50 rear. The kids get a little more noise back there than they would like some times though.

Rick
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 11:33 AM
  #16  
bc56f100's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: Pensacola
Default

dont know how that happened, but double post.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 11:51 AM
  #17  
smokinHawk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,354
Likes: 1
From: Columbus, ohio
Default

i estimated about 4% converter slip on my numbers
maybe real word are different dunno?
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 11:58 AM
  #18  
white2001s10's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,851
Likes: 0
From: Fairview Heights Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by Zombie
Hearing this worries me a little, I have a vig 3000 in my th400 and currently have 3.50 gears in the 9". I'm looking to move to 2.70's though. I haven't run the car yet.

You ran out of rpm in 3rd at 150 with the 2.73s? I plan on spinning mine to 6500 if it makes power there. FWIW, when I go under boost the converter goes to 5200 and stays at just 11psi. I wonder if i'm going to need a tighter converter.
Consider a 2.91:1 ratio for your 9". Look up the specs and compare the number of ring & pinion teeth and you'll see the advantage. You'll never break a 2.91, and you may be able to get a lightened ring used from a NASCAR.

FWIW I think you need a much tighter converter. When you swap to the lower ratio rear you may blow right through the converter.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 12:15 PM
  #19  
Zombie's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 4
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by white2001s10
Consider a 2.91:1 ratio for your 9". Look up the specs and compare the number of ring & pinion teeth and you'll see the advantage. You'll never break a 2.91, and you may be able to get a lightened ring used from a NASCAR.

FWIW I think you need a much tighter converter. When you swap to the lower ratio rear you may blow right through the converter.
I'm concerned about the converter and low gears like you mentioned. I'm in wait and see mode now since my car is not running right now. As for 2.91's it's an option, I know someone who works for a NASCAR truck team, my driveshaft is from one of their trucks LOL.

I'm not against a tighter converter since the primary use of my car is on the street. Tighter just means more streetable. I'm thinking 2600, but I have to see how this one works first.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 12:24 PM
  #20  
qqwqeqwrqwqtq's Avatar
FormerVendor
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,444
Likes: 2
From: WWW.SPEEDINC.COM
Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
Of course, I would need more car info, but 3.08's or 2.73's shouldn't be out of the question. Take my car, for example:

3750 lb, 670 rwhp, should be good for 140 - 145 mph in the quarter.

25.5" tall tire, TH350, 10% converter slip.

Power peak is at 5800 rpm.

It tops out at ~145 mph at 6200 rpm with 2.73 gears. I know this because I ran it all the way to 150 mph on the dyno and the engine was tapped out.

Even with the 2.73's, it will still spin the Nitto's from 55 mph without even downshifting to 2nd gear.
Wouldn't that calculate out to more like 20% converter slip? (Seems like you need a tighter/better converter).
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 PM.

story-0
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

Slideshow: This heavily modified 1971 Camaro mixes classic muscle car styling with a fifth-generation Camaro interior and modern LS3 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:06:42


VIEW MORE
story-1
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

Slideshow: From wobbling harmonic balancers to failed EBCMs, these are the issues that define long-term C5 ownership and what repairs typically involve.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-07 18:44:57


VIEW MORE
story-2
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-5
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE
story-6
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Slideshow: A one-off sports car that looks like a vintage Italian exotic-but hides a C6 Corvette underneath-just sold for the price of a new mid-engine Corvette.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-23 18:53:41


VIEW MORE
story-7
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

Slideshow: A heavily reworked 1972 K5 Blazer swaps its off-road roots for a low-slung street-focused build with modern V8 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-09 18:08:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

Slideshow: There are thousands of used Camaros on the market but we think you should avoid these 10

By | 2026-02-17 17:09:30


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

Slideshows: Which one of these myths do you believe?

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-28 18:10:11


VIEW MORE