Good luck at the track, lil bro!

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Mar 11, 2006 | 08:11 AM

#41

2002 Trans Am

TECH Addict

Joined: Apr 2002

Posts: 2,417

Likes: 0

From: Waldwick, NJ

Just a little while ago you said you were going with a TH400, why the change?

Mar 11, 2006 | 11:57 AM

#42

KAOS

TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (5)

Joined: Sep 2003

Posts: 1,586

Likes: 6

stregth and performance. might suffer on the mpg but he wont have to worry about it

Mar 11, 2006 | 06:59 PM

#43

2002 Trans Am

TECH Addict

Joined: Apr 2002

Posts: 2,417

Likes: 0

From: Waldwick, NJ

Quote:

Originally Posted by KAOS

stregth and performance. might suffer on the mpg but he wont have to worry about it

huh???

strength and performance would be the TH400, mpg would be the 4L60E with an OD...unless your not talking to me

Mar 11, 2006 | 07:10 PM

#44

frcefed98

TECH Senior Member

iTrader: (16)

Joined: Oct 2002

Posts: 6,907

Likes: 6

From: Albuquerque, NM

I stuck with a built 4L60E because the shear easy of installation. The added expense of going to a TH400(crossmember, shifter, etc...) kinda put me off on it. I figured if my stock 4L60E lasted me this long with different FI set ups then a stage 4 vacuum modulated 4L60E would last just as long.

J