The Ultimate Turbo Cam
1. 228 224 with a 116LSA
2. 224 224 with a 116LSA
add your coice and please leave reasons why: Im sure this will help many when choosing a cam for their forced induction project.
THANKS ~Guy
Turbo 101
The words overlap sometimes which can make it hard to read, but just highlight the paragraphs and you'll be alright.
Trending Topics
225/225 .581 .581 113LSA he said it will give me tons of power and the chunkiness I am looking for. Thanks again ~Guy
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
225/225 .581 .581 113LSA he said it will give me tons of power and the chunkiness I am looking for. Thanks again ~Guy
Also....
https://ls1tech.com/forums/search.php
Im not being rude, I just hate asking a question on here and being told to call someone. I mean if I wanted to call someone I would, but then you get one answer. vs. on here you get a few answers, people picking them apart, and reasoning, and fallow ups and what not.
Back to the subject of an optimal turbo cam. What out there has worked wonders on what setup? Theres setups out ther with tons of things done making good numbers, then theres setups out there with minimal stuff done exceding those, How crucial is the camshaft selection in a turbo car?
I just used my freinds 224/224 .580/.580 112 and it seems to work fine. 5.3L 8.6:1 , ported 6.0 heads, 15psi boost.
Not to hijack his thread but what other info would be needed to determine what would be a better cam? besides testing each one. Like would an LS6 cam be better? about the same? WAY better?
here, but anyone who just rattles off duration and LSA numbers is doing the OP a disservice. Im not being rude, I just hate asking a question on here and being told to call someone. I mean if I wanted to call someone I would, but then you get one answer. vs. on here you get a few answers, people picking them apart, and reasoning, and fallow ups and what not.
Back to the subject of an optimal turbo cam. What out there has worked wonders on what setup? Theres setups out ther with tons of things done making good numbers, then theres setups out there with minimal stuff done exceding those, How crucial is the camshaft selection in a turbo car?
I just used my freinds 224/224 .580/.580 112 and it seems to work fine. 5.3L 8.6:1 , ported 6.0 heads, 15psi boost.
Not to hijack his thread but what other info would be needed to determine what would be a better cam? besides testing each one. Like would an LS6 cam be better? about the same? WAY better?
The stock LS6 cam will work very well on a turbo build, in fact dozens of cams will.
IMO, when it comes to a turbocharged setup, things like turbo selection, tuning, manifolds, BOOST, CR, heads etc, will have more of an impact than a camshaft.
Although.....a big camshaft can seriously hurt driveability and power/torque at lower rpms. It may help up top.....thats another debate though. IMO what you would lose down low, isnt worth it, unless you want a lopey cam.
If one setup doesnt make enough power, turn up the boost.
Now, back to the original question. He hasks what cam would be optimal for a turbo build....
Are we talking a 1000cc 15,000rpm motor, or a 427ci 6000rpm motor ? What car, what engine, what turbos, what useage ?
Its hard to advise someone who asks a totally open ended question.
How long is a piece of string ??
And as I said, use the search facility. These questions have been asked so many times, and there is a wealth of information in this forum, from people who have asked similar questions, albeit a little more specific.
Last edited by stevieturbo; Jan 11, 2007 at 11:53 AM.
I have no idea. Havnt had it to the track yet and it will never see a dyno. I should be able to get an idea when I run it and get a mph.





