Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Synergy Twin dyno results....two dynos

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-19-2007 | 02:25 PM
  #1  
Rick@Synergy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
From: Fremont, Ca
Default Synergy Twin dyno results....two dynos

Ok, so I was able to get results from my dyno and a Dynojet which is what everyone likes to see. So here are the two graphs, same car, same day pretty much. On my dyno, I can apply alot more load to the car, so the car wound up making almost a full 1.5psi more than when I got on the dynojet. Which is about what I expected it to do. I also found I could squeeze more timing into the dynojet graph, but once I hit the street, I had to take it right back out. The Ic temps where not quite as good as they were on the street, but this should give an idea of what the car made so far. Now start the questions.

Rick



Old 04-19-2007 | 05:25 PM
  #2  
Bad30th's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Niiiiiiice !!

Rob (Bad30th)
Old 04-19-2007 | 05:48 PM
  #3  
Blackbird's Avatar
TECH Addict
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 1
From: Bellevue, Wa
Default

interesting for folks to take note.

due to load the car makes more boost aka more power on the street thus that tune joe blow gets on the local dynojet (unless they have the brake loading capability) is gonna be quite on the edge once you hit the road.

figure add the hp and tq another 1.5psi of boost makes to the dynojet graphs and they jive right up with the dynopack.

good stuff, wish I coulda make it up there for a test drive

so the next logical question for the GTO owners out there is how much and when can they ship!
Old 04-19-2007 | 08:51 PM
  #4  
trever1t's Avatar
2nd fastest 5.3 ECSB
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 26,691
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Default

Damn Rick the twins are making some good power. Wish my torque graph looked that good.
Old 04-20-2007 | 09:13 AM
  #5  
RealQuick's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,970
Likes: 15
From: MA
Default

What were the dtails of this setup again?
Old 04-20-2007 | 09:24 AM
  #6  
Ferocity02's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,397
Likes: 4
Default

Was this the GTO? Awesome results Rick!
Old 04-20-2007 | 09:38 AM
  #7  
Rick@Synergy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
From: Fremont, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by RealQuick
What were the dtails of this setup again?

Heads and mild camshaft, about 9-10 psi of boost and our twin kit.

Rick
Old 04-20-2007 | 09:39 AM
  #8  
Rick@Synergy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
From: Fremont, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by Blackbird
interesting for folks to take note.

due to load the car makes more boost aka more power on the street thus that tune joe blow gets on the local dynojet (unless they have the brake loading capability) is gonna be quite on the edge once you hit the road.

figure add the hp and tq another 1.5psi of boost makes to the dynojet graphs and they jive right up with the dynopack.

good stuff, wish I coulda make it up there for a test drive

so the next logical question for the GTO owners out there is how much and when can they ship!
Yes, thats what concerned me as well with the load thing.

I am hoping to put this kit around 5500-6K when done.

Rick
Old 04-20-2007 | 10:17 AM
  #9  
ChevyChad's Avatar
8 sec potential, 12 sec slip
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,092
Likes: 2
From: Savannah, GA
Default

Is that A/F correct on the dynojet graph? If so, thats way rich isn't it?

Very nice numbers!
Old 04-20-2007 | 10:19 AM
  #10  
Rick@Synergy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
From: Fremont, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by ChevyChad
Is that A/F correct on the dynojet graph? If so, thats way rich isn't it?

Very nice numbers!
No AFR was taken on the dynojet because I did no tuning on the dyno with the car. I had all the Wideband stuff in my laptop.

Rick
Old 04-20-2007 | 10:26 AM
  #11  
obZidian's Avatar
TECH Addict

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
From: Miami, Fl.
Default

could that line be boost?
Old 04-20-2007 | 10:49 AM
  #12  
Rick@Synergy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
From: Fremont, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by obZidian
could that line be boost?
No, no meassurements where taken on the dynojet, just numbers. I had everything on my laptop.

rick
Old 04-20-2007 | 12:03 PM
  #13  
99Z28LS1's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
Default

looks good rick, congrats
Old 04-20-2007 | 12:21 PM
  #14  
RooRnZ28's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
From: Central California
Default

nice!! so is there an fbody kit out as well?
Old 04-20-2007 | 04:35 PM
  #15  
stevieturbo's Avatar
9 Second Club
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,616
Likes: 180
From: Norn Iron
Default

Odd....Id have though the Dynapack would read a lot lower than the Dynojet numbers, even more so if the Dynojet might be making less boost ??
Old 04-20-2007 | 06:45 PM
  #16  
Rick@Synergy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
From: Fremont, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by RooRnZ28
nice!! so is there an fbody kit out as well?
working on it now, should be done soon.

Rick
Old 04-20-2007 | 06:47 PM
  #17  
Rick@Synergy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
From: Fremont, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
Odd....Id have though the Dynapack would read a lot lower than the Dynojet numbers, even more so if the Dynojet might be making less boost ??

Its different all the time. Its like when you see mustang dynos read different all over the place. Why do some read like dynojets and vise versa. The Dynapack cant be changed, there are no variables, and it meassures TQ, not estimated HP. So those are the differences.

Rick
Old 08-11-2007 | 09:52 AM
  #18  
Yogi Bear's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: League City, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Rick@Synergy
Its different all the time. Its like when you see mustang dynos read different all over the place. Why do some read like dynojets and vise versa. The Dynapack cant be changed, there are no variables, and it meassures TQ, not estimated HP. So those are the differences.

Rick
All dynos measure torque only. HP is always calculated from a formula based on torque and RPM. The dyno displays HP because it is doing the calculation for you using the torque and RPM numbers.
Old 08-11-2007 | 10:13 AM
  #19  
Rick@Synergy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
From: Fremont, Ca
Default

Originally Posted by Yogi Bear
All dynos measure torque only. HP is always calculated from a formula based on torque and RPM. The dyno displays HP because it is doing the calculation for you using the torque and RPM numbers.

Not true. The dynojet does not meassure TQ.

Rick
Old 08-11-2007 | 10:22 AM
  #20  
Yogi Bear's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: League City, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Rick@Synergy
Not true. The dynojet does not meassure TQ.

Rick
It HAS to measure torque. That's the only way to get HP. There is no instrument or machine that can "measure" HP. HP is calculated based on torque and RPM.


Quick Reply: Synergy Twin dyno results....two dynos



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:05 AM.