Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers
View Poll Results: what compression ratio are your running with boost?
8:1
8
2.92%
8.5:1
44
16.06%
9:1
55
20.07%
9.5:1
69
25.18%
10:1
66
24.09%
11:1
32
11.68%
Voters: 274. You may not vote on this poll

High static compression and forced induction

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-18-2007, 03:56 PM
  #41  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,712
Received 1,163 Likes on 756 Posts

Default

That would kick *** on the street.
Old 09-19-2007, 12:11 PM
  #42  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (59)
 
MIGHTYMOUSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 10,010
Received 45 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Websy21
What about 8:1 with a 408 on 91 pump?
maybe north of 850.. i don't have direct experience.. but i can assure you that displacement will hurt your mileage more than the compression
Old 09-19-2007, 01:54 PM
  #43  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (34)
 
Websy21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by MIGHTYMOUSE
maybe north of 850.. i don't have direct experience.. but i can assure you that displacement will hurt your mileage more than the compression
Ya, thats what I am beginning to think too. I am leaning more your way now MM, it makes more sense. By dropping CR you are able to run alot more boost on pump gas and have that safety factot too. I have meth, but don't want it to be on all the time and filling it up etc. I think I will set something up like you did, have it kick in under higher boost, etc. I think I am liking your setup more the more I think of it. Makes sense that high CR is more for the pure race crowd. Plus, like you said you aren't slamming your head of the steering wheel b/c your losing at stop lights I really think this is the way to go, 8.5-9 for turbo's anyways and 9-9.5 for S/C. Done deal, thanks guys!
Old 09-19-2007, 02:27 PM
  #44  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (59)
 
MIGHTYMOUSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 10,010
Received 45 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

consider how much power you want to make

5-6-700 you can keep highish compression and run around on pump gas without much sweat

8-9-1000 hp and you want to 'enjoy' the car on regular fuel i would def. drop the compression.
Old 09-19-2007, 02:40 PM
  #45  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (34)
 
Websy21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Wow, its so much better when a pro explains it, LOL. That makes so much sense, sacrifice a little down low and maximize power output with pump gas. Lower CR is the way to go unless all out race application, meth/race gas.

Just for curiousity any takers guessing here what someone on average would be leaving on the table motor alone by dropping one point in CR? Obviously it doesn't get out weighed by what extra boost you will be able to run though.

This is a very interesting topic as I always pondered this when I was going to go with a S/c on stock cubes. It didn't make sense to me to run 6.0 heads and drop to 9.5 just to run maybe one or 2 more psi. You're only limited to a certain power level within stock cubes so why go the extra mile for giving up efficiency, etc.
Old 09-19-2007, 05:07 PM
  #46  
Launching!
Thread Starter
 
bifster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: cobourg ON
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well guys looking into my build here a little farther seems like im almost limitied to 9:1 compression unless there are head gaskets out there i can use that will drop a full point for me haha. and with boost it seems like head askets are a problem to start with on a FI gen III but MM you are using the new felpro's correct? buuilt even with the addition for the extra 2 bolts? have you had time to check them out yet and see how they perform? what would be the best bet to deal with high boost numbers so far gasket wise??
Old 09-19-2007, 07:43 PM
  #47  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (34)
 
Websy21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I can't speak for the gaskets but I wouldn't worry about running 9:1 CR. You should be fine, I decided to go with 8.5 instead of 9.5 but if 9 was option for me I think I'd do it. Kinda the happy medium so to speak.
Old 09-19-2007, 09:04 PM
  #48  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (15)
 
KWIKKAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Well guys I talked to Tony at AFR and my SCR is not were I want it. I think I would want atleast 9.5 SCR. Here the set-up Ls2 402 with -12dish pistons and heads are AFR 225 72cc. I know I need a gasket size of 4.125 but what thickness do I need. Would 6.0L gaskets work or do I need something else. Thanks. I'll be using 93 oct fuel and it will be a street car. I may drive it about 100 miles a month. I would like about 750+rwhp. Thanks
Old 09-19-2007, 11:12 PM
  #49  
TECH Enthusiast
 
mahhddgtp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Loganville, GA
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Has anyone swung low 700rwhp with 15psi on a 346ci motor on 93pump? What CR for that? 8.1?
Old 09-20-2007, 08:04 AM
  #50  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (28)
 
TAQuickness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 3,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KWIKKAR
Well guys I talked to Tony at AFR and my SCR is not were I want it. I think I would want atleast 9.5 SCR. Here the set-up Ls2 402 with -12dish pistons and heads are AFR 225 72cc. I know I need a gasket size of 4.125 but what thickness do I need. Would 6.0L gaskets work or do I need something else. Thanks. I'll be using 93 oct fuel and it will be a street car. I may drive it about 100 miles a month. I would like about 750+rwhp. Thanks
You'll need a gasket thickness that give the desired quench. Much better to drop compression by changing the pistons.
Old 09-20-2007, 08:32 AM
  #51  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,712
Received 1,163 Likes on 756 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mahhddgtp
Has anyone swung low 700rwhp with 15psi on a 346ci motor on 93pump? What CR for that? 8.1?
I think that might a little hard, maybe you could get there with twin turbos but I doubt you'd get there with a blower and an A3 trans.
Old 09-21-2007, 08:21 AM
  #52  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (15)
 
KWIKKAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TAQuickness
You'll need a gasket thickness that give the desired quench. Much better to drop compression by changing the pistons.

Well I can't change the pistons so what gasket would you say I should get.
Old 09-23-2007, 10:33 PM
  #53  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
 
MonkeyBoneSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If one were to run a 347 on 93 fuel with a 10:1 ratio. What would be the advised max boost to run 10 - 12? Also how much would a cam play in this factor. Would you use a EPP blower cam 232/240 or a TR blower cam 214/230 ?
Old 09-24-2007, 04:34 PM
  #54  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,712
Received 1,163 Likes on 756 Posts

Default

I'd go with the bigger cam and boost less with 10:1 personally. But I think you can get into the low 600's at 10:1, and beyond that it's a matter of tunings and inlet air temps.
Old 09-25-2007, 10:25 AM
  #55  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
cablebandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 7,903
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

also a matter of dynamic compression
Old 09-25-2007, 10:33 AM
  #56  
rjw
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
rjw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tinker till it blows, then back it off a notch, maybe!!
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Hmmm....this thread has me curious as well
Old 09-25-2007, 04:45 PM
  #57  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
 
MonkeyBoneSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pro Stock John
I'd go with the bigger cam and boost less with 10:1 personally. But I think you can get into the low 600's at 10:1, and beyond that it's a matter of tunings and inlet air temps.
PSJ how many pounds would you think 10 at the most?
Old 09-28-2007, 05:50 AM
  #58  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
cablebandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 7,903
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

quit thinking boost and think horsepower. you guys need to consider your dynamic compression as well.
Old 09-28-2007, 07:56 AM
  #59  
rjw
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
rjw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tinker till it blows, then back it off a notch, maybe!!
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by cablebandit
quit thinking boost and think horsepower. you guys need to consider your dynamic compression as well.
Which is hard to consider in some cases due to mytsery cam specs

But in that you mentioned it twice in this thread, what do you considerto be the threshold?

thx

bte: Were you happy with your Darts?
Old 09-28-2007, 02:32 PM
  #60  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
cablebandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 7,903
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

i went higher static. lower dynamic. Every cam is different...do you not know the specs of your cam?


Quick Reply: High static compression and forced induction



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:06 AM.