Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Is a single gt4294 too much?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-29-2007, 03:37 PM
  #21  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hellbents10
I agree with you on kit design. Take the same setup and put a TC unit with lighter wheels and a smaller compressor cover to fill and it will come on sooner. The Garrets are extremely nice but they are not the end all for every application. I am a fan of the BW stuff myself, but I know its not the God of all turbos for every application.

Very true, part of the reason why we build units from all 3 manufactures and then some. Some just work better in certain applications.
Old 11-29-2007, 03:39 PM
  #22  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (33)
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ok
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Oh don't get me wrong; I'm not a garrett *****. I've used hybrid holsets and other off the wall setups in the past. But I've used a lot of Garrett based turbos in the past with good success. Used to be, they were the only ones who published their maps.

I do think the common perception of kit design focuses far to much on this number or that and not enough people take a holistic view of their design and balancing the system. A well designed system should be greater than the sum of it's parts.
Old 11-29-2007, 04:05 PM
  #23  
TECH Regular
 
ChrisUlrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I don't know how anyone could debate which turbos are better. Unless you have power restrictions and a motor to build the boost fast enough the spool time won't be noticable... then the cheaper turbo is the obvious alt choice.

But I can't see how anyone can say BW's Extended Tip turbos don't own all. It's all in it's performance and on paper. 74mm BW will flow 120lbs/min at max potential. That outflows even the best of the GT42 series turbos... which are 76mm (I think).

Then if you want smaller. Their 56mm can flow up to damn near 65lbs/min!!
Old 11-29-2007, 04:12 PM
  #24  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
hellbents10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Spring Lake, MI
Posts: 4,439
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Thank you for that. I would have said it too. We are using a 74mm BW unit on a GTO. Spools at 3k and makes big power at low boost levels and does not make so much hot air.
Old 11-29-2007, 04:18 PM
  #25  
TECH Regular
 
ChrisUlrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by hellbents10
Thank you for that. I would have said it too. We are using a 74mm BW unit on a GTO. Spools at 3k and makes big power at low boost levels and does not make so much hot air.
Are you the guy that made 735whp @ 15psi? What did you make at 10psi? 565whp?

That thing should push another 4-5psi as well.
Old 11-29-2007, 04:29 PM
  #26  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
hellbents10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Spring Lake, MI
Posts: 4,439
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Well it made the 565 at 12spi with a 9.8:1 afr and 10 degrees of timing. We went to 16 degrees with a 11:1 afr and made 659 at 12psi. Then we went down to 14 degrees total and made 689 on 13psi and then made 735 with the same total advance at full power with 15psi and made the 735. Right now rolling down the road with 20-30 degree IATs vs. the 100-110 on the dyno we are seeing 18-19 degrees of advance. I would imagine its a 800 or so right now on the street. It still has room to grow too.
Old 11-29-2007, 04:35 PM
  #27  
TECH Regular
 
ChrisUlrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by hellbents10
Well it made the 565 at 12spi with a 9.8:1 afr and 10 degrees of timing. We went to 16 degrees with a 11:1 afr and made 659 at 12psi. Then we went down to 14 degrees total and made 689 on 13psi and then made 735 with the same total advance at full power with 15psi and made the 735. Right now rolling down the road with 20-30 degree IATs vs. the 100-110 on the dyno we are seeing 18-19 degrees of advance. I would imagine its a 800 or so right now on the street. It still has room to grow too.
And you have full boost @ 3k. See now that's a turbo!
Old 11-29-2007, 04:37 PM
  #28  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
hellbents10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Spring Lake, MI
Posts: 4,439
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Not full on we are building strong at that point though. Its making about 6 or so at that point and comes full on shortly after. On the dynojet dyno it came on a bit slower then the street of coarse.
Old 11-29-2007, 04:41 PM
  #29  
TECH Regular
 
ChrisUlrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by hellbents10
Not full on we are building strong at that point though. Its making about 6 or so at that point and comes full on shortly after. On the dynojet dyno it came on a bit slower then the street of coarse.
Oh mah bad. I wonder what a GT4202r would spool at in the same situation?

My friend has a S256 in his Neon SRT. He makes 21psi @ 3k. My other friend has a GT3582r and makes 20psi @ 4k. The GT3582r flows @ 61lbs/min. The S256 flows at 58lbs/min!! I think that's just crazy... BW FTMFW!!
Old 11-29-2007, 04:44 PM
  #30  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
hellbents10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Spring Lake, MI
Posts: 4,439
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Nice! you need to get a 374 on that WS6 now!!
Old 11-29-2007, 04:45 PM
  #31  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ChrisUlrich
Oh mah bad. I wonder what a GT4202r would spool at in the same situation?

My friend has a S256 in his Neon SRT. He makes 21psi @ 3k. My other friend has a GT3582r and makes 20psi @ 4k. The GT3582r flows @ 61lbs/min. The S256 flows at 58lbs/min!! I think that's just crazy... BW FTMFW!!

You will love our FI58 then when its released. It will be in a small package as well and flow 62lbs/min, and also in BB and water cooled if you like. Or you can move up to our FI62 which will be offered in BB as well and flow 72 lbs/min....lol
Old 11-29-2007, 04:50 PM
  #32  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
hellbents10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Spring Lake, MI
Posts: 4,439
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Nice Dr. Turbo. Those units sound bad ***. What covers and wheels are you using and or making. Things are changing quickly in the FI world in the last few years.
Old 11-29-2007, 04:52 PM
  #33  
TECH Regular
 
ChrisUlrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DrTurbo
You will love our FI58 then when its released. It will be in a small package as well and flow 62lbs/min, and also in BB and water cooled if you like. Or you can move up to our FI62 which will be offered in BB as well and flow 72 lbs/min....lol
You have any more info on these turbos? I never heard of em' until this thread. How are they performing in comparison to the S series turbos? From (Don't flame me) Bullseye or yourself?
Old 11-29-2007, 04:53 PM
  #34  
TECH Regular
 
ChrisUlrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by hellbents10
Nice! you need to get a 374 on that WS6 now!!
Duuuuude... if I could. I would. Me and Dave get along great. hahaha I'm sure he'd love data from a LS1 in a 2000 Trans Am.
Old 11-29-2007, 05:00 PM
  #35  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hellbents10
Nice Dr. Turbo. Those units sound bad ***. What covers and wheels are you using and or making. Things are changing quickly in the FI world in the last few years.
Everything is custom, but you will have the selection of housings on the compressor side, turbine side and different turbine wheels like the GT and T-netic units. Also will be in the same frame so it will hopefully all be interchangeable with the other units.
Old 11-29-2007, 05:04 PM
  #36  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
70Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ChrisUlrich
I don't know how anyone could debate which turbos are better. Unless you have power restrictions and a motor to build the boost fast enough the spool time won't be noticable... then the cheaper turbo is the obvious alt choice.

But I can't see how anyone can say BW's Extended Tip turbos don't own all. It's all in it's performance and on paper. 74mm BW will flow 120lbs/min at max potential. That outflows even the best of the GT42 series turbos... which are 76mm (I think).

Then if you want smaller. Their 56mm can flow up to damn near 65lbs/min!!
So, you don't see how people can debate on turbos, but you do know that the BW is better? hmmmm.
Old 11-29-2007, 05:04 PM
  #37  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ChrisUlrich
You have any more info on these turbos? I never heard of em' until this thread. How are they performing in comparison to the S series turbos? From (Don't flame me) Bullseye or yourself?
Bullseye just uses standard BW units S3XX's/S4XX's...with no internal modifications and no custom pieces internally as well. I don't know the guys there myself but they though......


Nobody has matched the performance of our S-series and selection availability with the BW's. Now the new FIXXX units bring it to the next level in customizing and new options.
Old 11-29-2007, 05:06 PM
  #38  
TECH Regular
 
ChrisUlrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 70Stang
So, you don't see how people can debate on turbos, but you do know that the BW is better? hmmmm.
I was just making a point. No reason to be a smartass. Sorta like... I can't see how it's a debate what's a better engine. The LT1 or LSx.
Old 11-29-2007, 05:13 PM
  #39  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
70Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So, do you have any actual DATA that compares spool time on the same car with the two different turbos? On the neon thing, is it the same turbo kit and everything?

DrTurbo, do you have any compressor / turbine maps I could look at, so I can see what everyone is talking about?
Old 11-29-2007, 05:15 PM
  #40  
TECH Regular
 
ChrisUlrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 70Stang
So, do you have any actual DATA that compares spool time on the same car with the two different turbos? On the neon thing, is it the same turbo kit and everything?

DrTurbo, do you have any compressor / turbine maps I could look at, so I can see what everyone is talking about?
The kit is close enough. To be honest... the manifold on the S256 is supposed to be crap compared to the make on the GT35r setup. AND... the GT35r had aftermarket cams in it while S256 was stock.

Just a basic turbo kit otherwise. Nothing special


Quick Reply: Is a single gt4294 too much?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:56 PM.