Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

best turbo to replace 76GTS?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-08-2007, 08:44 AM
  #81  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
TURBO383WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Andrews, Texas
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Big Geek
I want a near instant spool and torque that plants your hiney in the seat. I have even thought about trying out a T74GTS for the type of spooling characteristics I am looking for but thought that it might be a little too small. I guess I will stick with the P76GTS for now
J

if you're wanting a street car and not wanting to go all out, you'll absolutely love the 76GTS! my problem with it is i've got too many cubes for the 76 to work efficiently. basically the turbo is choking the motor. before the a/w intercooler, my inlet temps would start around 85* before the burnout and end up around 160* by the end of the 1/8th. i can keep the temps down w/ the new intercooler, but it's just a bandaid. i know a T6 would be my best bet, but i just don't have the room and don't really want to redo everything since i'm already building a track only car. just looking for a little more out efficiency out of this setup since the other car won't be finished for a year or two.

now i wish somebody would make plastic mock up turbos to rent out!
Old 12-08-2007, 09:20 AM
  #82  
TECH Addict
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I've searched long and hard for a replacement since my 76GTS is pushing 388 cid. Works reasonable well, though, for a best of 146 mph in the quarter at full weight at 17 psi with the 40 mm Tial WG wide open. It'll make 22+ psi on my motor and I have the blown head gaskets to prove it.

My 76GTS is absolutely crammed in there on the turbine side. I do have room for a bigger compressor scroll. The problem is that the 76 is a lot of power in a very small package, so it's hard to improve upon it.

The closest anyone has come is the ST80, which will support about 200 more hp, but I understand it's about the same size as the GT42 and PT88.

I got a little excited when I saw this:

some special gt-45 with a nonsponser link
. . . but then saw where the only downpipe attachment available is 5".

Mike

Last edited by smokinHawk; 12-08-2007 at 10:51 AM. Reason: nonsponser link
Old 12-08-2007, 09:49 AM
  #83  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,601
Received 1,744 Likes on 1,302 Posts

Default

you see the price? $3k
Old 12-08-2007, 10:48 AM
  #84  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Zombie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ddnspider
you see the price? $3k
dats a lotta money!
Old 12-08-2007, 10:50 AM
  #85  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (48)
 
smokinHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Columbus, ohio
Posts: 7,354
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

plus only supports close to 1200rwhp, the pte88 claims 1250 and is half the price.
Old 12-08-2007, 07:42 PM
  #86  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
TURBO383WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Andrews, Texas
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

don't get me wrong, i love this turbo, i was just looking for something a little larger to compliment the cubes a little better. i normally run 20-22 #'s on up to 24* of timing, but i have to shift around 5600-5800rpm. don't know if it's the cam or what, but it falls on it's face at 5900. i've seen as high as 30#'s of boost (FAST datalog) when i accidentally hooked the boost controller solonoids up backwards. luckily my tuner is way smarter than i am and had it drop timing and dump fuel. probably saved the motor on a few passes that way. guess maybe i'll just keep this turbo and start trying to find a 91.5 or so for the new car.
Old 12-08-2007, 07:52 PM
  #87  
TECH Addict
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TURBO383WS6
don't get me wrong, i love this turbo, i was just looking for something a little larger to compliment the cubes a little better. i normally run 20-22 #'s on up to 24* of timing, but i have to shift around 5600-5800rpm. ..
What kind of power/traps are you getting?

Mike
Old 12-08-2007, 08:02 PM
  #88  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
TURBO383WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Andrews, Texas
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

never seen a dyno, but our local 1/8th mile is at approx 4500ft. and my best to date was a 6.57 @105 w/ a 1.43 60'. car weighed 3703# w/ me in it before i switched to an A/W intercooler, so i figure around 3750# or a little more on that pass. this was also on 20psi and 23* of timing, launching on 17psi.
Old 12-08-2007, 10:19 PM
  #89  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Don't get shadow boost confused with real boost. We typically see crazy boost numbers like this sometimes from smaller turbos. What is happening is backpressure it often HUGE and the incoming boost and exiting air collide inside the motor. What happens is boost climbs very high. You don't seen any gain in power though and actually slow the car down in the process. 9 times out of 10 what it does is lift the heads off the block or blow a head gasket.
Old 12-08-2007, 11:23 PM
  #90  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Zombie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TURBO383WS6
never seen a dyno, but our local 1/8th mile is at approx 4500ft. and my best to date was a 6.57 @105 w/ a 1.43 60'. car weighed 3703# w/ me in it before i switched to an A/W intercooler, so i figure around 3750# or a little more on that pass. this was also on 20psi and 23* of timing, launching on 17psi.
Very similar to my car. I'm 3800lbs+ raceweight have 370 cubes and my best 1/8 is 6.446 @ 106.6 with a 1.48 60' but i've trapped as high as 107.5. Track is 2100' but the DA was 3300' that day.

My boost was 19psi and a max timing of 18 degrees. I use to shift the car at 6100 but since swapping to the .96 a/r housing have been able to up that to 6700 on 15psi but haven't tried 20psi yet (power was still climbing on 15psi).
Old 12-09-2007, 10:58 AM
  #91  
TECH Addict
 
engineermike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TURBO383WS6
... but our local 1/8th mile is at approx 4500ft. and my best to date was a 6.57 @105 w/ a 1.43 60'. car weighed 3703# w/ me in it before i switched to an A/W intercooler, so i figure around 3750# or a little more on that pass. this was also on 20psi and 23* of timing, launching on 17psi.
I think there's more in it. I've pulled 115 in the 1/8 at full stock weight+ on the 76GTS on a 388 LTx at 17 psi. I was even launching on the foot brake and no boost.

I think if you look real hard and test some pressures, you'll find a bottleneck in your combo.

Mike
Old 12-09-2007, 11:36 AM
  #92  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (77)
 
black98ws6ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: louisville,ky
Posts: 2,107
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
I think there's more in it. I've pulled 115 in the 1/8 at full stock weight+ on the 76GTS on a 388 LTx at 17 psi. I was even launching on the foot brake and no boost.

I think if you look real hard and test some pressures, you'll find a bottleneck in your combo.

Mike
I have a stock motor 03 Cobra that has been 118 in the 1/8 at 3620 raceweight, on 23 psi.

Anthony
Old 12-09-2007, 12:52 PM
  #93  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by black98ws6ta
I have a stock motor 03 Cobra that has been 118 in the 1/8 at 3620 raceweight, on 23 psi.

Anthony
The smaller the motor keeps getting the faster that 76GTS will go. High PR's F.T.W!!!
Old 12-09-2007, 12:56 PM
  #94  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (77)
 
black98ws6ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: louisville,ky
Posts: 2,107
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DrTurbo
The smaller the motor keeps getting the faster that 76GTS will go. High PR's F.T.W!!!
Off the top of your head do you know of any 3600+ lb cars going faster on a gts?
Old 12-10-2007, 08:07 AM
  #95  
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
TURBO383WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Andrews, Texas
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by engineermike
I think there's more in it. I've pulled 115 in the 1/8 at full stock weight+ on the 76GTS on a 388 LTx at 17 psi. I was even launching on the foot brake and no boost.

I think if you look real hard and test some pressures, you'll find a bottleneck in your combo.

Mike
you're probably right. i may try putting a 58mm throttlebody, and some better heads on there. right now, i've got a stock throttlebody w/ and airfoil, ported intake (58mm) and some semi-ported stock heads. this may be why i'm seeing such high boost numbers. i'm still scared to see what the backpressure is on this turbo!
Old 12-10-2007, 05:33 PM
  #96  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Willem @ Fuel Injection Concepts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

fyi, for you guys that want a good turbo in a "compact" package, i can have PTE build a GT4788 center section with PTE88 housings.



Quick Reply: best turbo to replace 76GTS?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:25 PM.