Max boost for compression
#43
Why? Its already been talked about into the ground. Heck, the "What CR for high boost?" thread I started forever ago is STILL being discussed. Nothing is new. High CR, and high boost = There are those that get away with it for a short period of time without problems and they think its a great combo until they end up like everyone else who did it and ended up in a re-build.
#44
whats the difference u'll still end up with the same cylinder pressure..i have 6.0 heads on a stock motor 9.4comp and have to run 12psi to make the same power as a stock head and motor. you have to run good gas at some point..but gas and boost alway end's up as an excuse for somthing
#45
It has only been beat to death with what people "feel" is right and most just follow the norm and dont actually have a boosted setup. The only guys that showed any real world proof were running higher CR and high boost. Only a few people have pushed the limits of their setups and unfortunately most of them are not in this debate because it is ridiculous. I mean look at people that are pushing their srock LS2 and LS1 motors which are high compression. A lot of those numbers are equal to people with 8.5:1 CR motors running lots of boost.
Also the thread title is max boost for compression. Not max longevity for a given compression and boost.
Also the thread title is max boost for compression. Not max longevity for a given compression and boost.
#46
AGAIN, it has already been beaten to death. There are those that think like OhGTO and end up in a re-build (like my former boss who ran only 7#'s of boost through his stock bottom ended LS1 which was intercooled, well tuned, and had a good fuel system and ended up frying a piston at 2500 miles), and there are those that run low CR and high boost and last 100,000+ miles.