8# ATI reliable on LS1 Engine?
Was thinking about running 8psi ATI and just wanted to know if I will HAVE TO become a part of the "engine rebuild club" later or not?
Heres the setup I was thinking about purchasing:
ATI D-1SC (or P-1SC) 8psi
145 slave cylinder
Good Clutch (havent decided yet)
NGK TR6 spark plugs
Dyno testing and tuning
Injectors will depend on (FMU setup - not decided yet either)
Car is a 2002 TA WS6 6-spd. Has nothing but an airlid, corsa exhaust, slp y-pipe, and some appearance mods.
So would this be "reliable" to my engine or not? By engine I mean EVERYTHING (springs, rods, crankshaft, you name it).
Reason for this post is because I hear a lot of people saying if I were to run boost I would definetly need to rebuild my engine in a matter of a short period of time (not more than 3 years depending on driving style) while others tend to say if it was tuned correctly there would be no problems and there should be no need to rebuild the engine and it should last as long as it came STOCK unless I go over 10# of boost.
To some of you this might sound like im asking for your prediction on this. Anyone with a 98 LS1 with a supercharger installed IN THE SAME YEAR (preferably the ATI procharger) would be of EXCELLENT help now. :bow:
I asked this same question to some s/c ls1 owners but the more response I get the better. Ill try posting in the "internal engine" board as well to get answers from both sides.
This should be a investment for no more than $5500 (hopefully). It would mean a lot to me if I can get some advice. Dont want to regret anything.
Thanks a ton for all of you who can be of assistance.
Two months later, rebuilding new LS6 forged motor. A ring landing broke off from piston #7, and on the long 'please make it home' drive, piston tries to compress ring landing against head, skirt of piston on opposite side cracks cylinder wall.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/zerothread?id=595633
I rember your original post from the vette forum. On the dyno sheets you posted it was tough to tell exactly what the A/F ratio was, but it looked like it was around 13:1.
Do you think the second tune from MMS had anything to do with it, leaning it out? Or, was it just a matter of time in your opinion.
I agree with Mike00FRC:
Quote: "Do you think the second tune from MMS had anything to do with it, leaning it out? Or, was it just a matter of time in your opinion."
???
The lead time on a new motor to your own specs can be 2 months.
2002_TAWS6 - I had to ship the PCM back to MMS due to wrong VIN, and found damage when I removed it. The car is a 2000, which should have a sheet metal cover on the PCM, I returned one with a cast cover and VIN code of 99 WS6(which was the cause of the codes). MMS said there was nothing wrong with PCM, and shipped back a refurbished one with a sheet metal cover. The dynosheet was from when the car was at the shop, not with the PCM they shipped back. I was always skeptical about the programming in the new PCM since it wasn't on the car when they dynotuned it.
They never told me about the miss on the dyno until I called them about it not being able to do a full-throttle upshift.
I also sent them photos and asked them about broken PCM mount, cracked fender and covers, they claimed they knew nothing about that. (See links below) I can't claim they caused the damage, since when it wouldn't start, I towed it to a dealer who found the wrong VIN# in the PCM.
I'm looking for an alternative tuner in CA after my new motor is in.
A/F ratio 13.5
http://www.baseframe.com/images/dynohp.jpg
When I removed PCM to ship back to MMS, I found:
The access panel was cracked
http://www.baseframe.com/images/cracked_panel.jpg
The fender underneath was cracked
http://www.baseframe.com/images/cracked_fender.jpg
The PCM bracket was cracked and glued
http://www.baseframe.com/images/brok...ed_bracket.jpg
The PCM was from a different year (cast cover) and was programmed with a different VIN. The correct VIN was written on the cover.
http://www.baseframe.com/images/castcover_pcm.jpg
Would you say the only reason that caused all of this was the incorrect PCM tuning? Would you think I would be safe if I were to do the dyno tuning and having the s.c. at 8# on the stock motor? Would that be reliable?
I dont want to blow my motor because if I do I wont have the money to buy a forged one. What do you think? All opinions and suggestions are very appreciated. Again good luck in your new engine just dont get too excited
lol.melloyellow- you mentioned "the lead time to the new motor to your own specs would be 2 months".

Why do you think so? I can point out at least 3 people who have done over a year now with their chargers on stock motors (i can give your their user IDs if necesary). Not that I am trying to argue or anything, just wanted to know your opinion/reasoning with what you stated.
Trending Topics
My car was running at the limit with both boost level and A/F ratio. I also had some unknown variables such as the PCM dyno'd vs. installed, and change caused by upgrade to front-mount single intercooler.
Good luck on your FI install!
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
For your setup, I'd go 12:1 don't get too greedy you A/F on the street will probably be leaner than that when the car is under full load.
If you want to have a new motor built forged to your specs, it's better to build it in advance and not in a rush and can take up to 2 months.
Stock motor might never blow, but better if you have a forged motor ready in case and/or when it does. Plus you can be more aggresive with your stock motor setup if you know you have a spare on hand.
Forged bottom end, stock cubes aren't that expensive relatively.
But if you wait until your motor blows, 7-8 weeks to build and ship a new motor with your car down and out could feel like a long time.



