Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Boosted 346 w/ AFR 225's cracks 800 RWHP!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-2008, 01:18 PM
  #41  
7 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
NicD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 2,776
Received 303 Likes on 203 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by N4cer
Are we saying this is impressive? Anthony Peck put down nearly 900hp through unworked 317's.
What was Anthony's full setup?
Old 04-08-2008, 01:19 PM
  #42  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
N4cer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ashland, KY
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Man, I would have to call him. I only read a little of this thread because the topic said enough. Basically I don't see the point to wasting money on AFRs for an FI car where you're cramming air down its throat.
Old 04-08-2008, 01:25 PM
  #43  
7 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
NicD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 2,776
Received 303 Likes on 203 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by N4cer
Man, I would have to call him. I only read a little of this thread because the topic said enough. Basically I don't see the point to wasting money on AFRs for an FI car where you're cramming air down its throat.
That's kind of what I was getting at, that I don't think his combo is anything close to what Tony is describing here. I think the point of putting AFRs or any higher dollar aftermarket higher flowing head on an FI car is to maximize the efficiency of the combo and the thicker deck can't hurt either. Then again it's just 2 ways to skin a cat so to speak so pick your method.

I think the impressive part is that it's making ~800 rwhp on 15-16 psi on a D1SC with stock cubes and you need good flowing parts to make that happen. Us turbo guys have it easier to make more power more efficiently IMO.
Old 04-08-2008, 04:19 PM
  #44  
Launching!
iTrader: (35)
 
crashinaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Given the displacement,boost level and cam... I think that thing is laying down VERY nice power.
Old 04-08-2008, 04:48 PM
  #45  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
2000 Tran Zam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ahwatukee, Az
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ninetres
I always got a kick out of the folks who said heads aren't vital in Fi applications. Comedians I tell ya.
When your limited by the stock block, no, they arent critical, lol.
Old 04-08-2008, 08:11 PM
  #46  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
ninetres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mufflerville, CA
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2000 Tran Zam
When your limited by the stock block, no, they arent critical, lol.
Explain limited.....I'm confused. Several folks have gone deep into the single digits on "stock limited blocks" lol. Maybe you were being sarcastic

I agree w/ Tony M, (sorry MM) but I believe better flowing heads provide greater efficiency at cramming air into a motor. If you boost 20psi to make 800whp....and I boost 14, to make 800whp (on an apples to apples combo except for heads)......which turbo is creating more heat? Then set them both at 20psi.....which makes more power?

I'm not doubting you MM, I admire you in fact lol
I even used a video of you running 10s rowin gears in a presentation back in my college days!

Last edited by ninetres; 04-08-2008 at 08:33 PM.
Old 04-08-2008, 08:19 PM
  #47  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (59)
 
MIGHTYMOUSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 10,010
Received 45 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

same thing is happening in the cylinder to make the same power.

if you turn up either you will lift the heads at the same time.. the 30* cooler your intake charge *may* be is negligable
Old 04-08-2008, 08:33 PM
  #48  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
ninetres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mufflerville, CA
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MIGHTYMOUSE
same thing is happening in the cylinder to make the same power.

if you turn up either you will lift the heads at the same time.. the 30* cooler your intake charge *may* be is negligable
Cylinder pressure lifts heads (for the most part), which would be greater with higher boost. Right?
Old 04-08-2008, 08:38 PM
  #49  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (59)
 
MIGHTYMOUSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 10,010
Received 45 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

no

boost is a measure of pressure in the intake, nothing to do with cylinder presssure really

torque is a better measure of cylinder pressure (excluding detonation, that can make quite a bit more than tq can)
Old 04-08-2008, 08:42 PM
  #50  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
ninetres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mufflerville, CA
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MIGHTYMOUSE
no

boost is a measure of pressure in the intake, nothing to do with cylinder presssure really

torque is a better measure of cylinder pressure (excluding detonation, that can make quite a bit more than tq can)
I know what boost measures. Take two builds, same cubes, same turbos, same compression, one has stock 317 heads @ 20psi, the other has AFR 225s @14psi. Which has higher cylinder pressure?
Old 04-08-2008, 08:48 PM
  #51  
Flow Wizard
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
Tony Mamo @ AFR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

How about the fact the .750 deck thickness in the AFR can handle alot more cylinder pressure before it starts lifting head gaskets. Its literally twice as thick as a stock casting.

Another perk of the efficient head (and superior aftermarket casting)....alot of people switch to our product for that very reason.

Can't deny the fact that more boost is certainly the great equalizer....an aspect of performance an N/A application doesnt have the luxury of relying on.

Tony

PS....The answer to ninetres riddle is whichever combo makes the most torque (and has the highest BMEP numbers)
Old 04-08-2008, 09:04 PM
  #52  
7 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
NicD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 2,776
Received 303 Likes on 203 Posts

Default

more boost = more restriction = less efficient = more heat generated = more power wasted = greater chance of detonation = more octane required = hell if I can think of anything else LOL!
Old 04-10-2008, 06:53 PM
  #53  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
2000 Tran Zam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ahwatukee, Az
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NicD
more boost = more restriction = less efficient = more heat generated = more power wasted = greater chance of detonation = more octane required = hell if I can think of anything else LOL!
You forgot it sounds cooler too
Old 04-10-2008, 06:56 PM
  #54  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
2000 Tran Zam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ahwatukee, Az
Posts: 2,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ninetres
Explain limited.....I'm confused. Several folks have gone deep into the single digits on "stock limited blocks" lol. Maybe you were being sarcastic

I agree w/ Tony M, (sorry MM) but I believe better flowing heads provide greater efficiency at cramming air into a motor. If you boost 20psi to make 800whp....and I boost 14, to make 800whp (on an apples to apples combo except for heads)......which turbo is creating more heat? Then set them both at 20psi.....which makes more power?

I'm not doubting you MM, I admire you in fact lol
I even used a video of you running 10s rowin gears in a presentation back in my college days!

Sorry, I meant stock bottom end, lol.

Meaning that on the stock bottom end your limited to mid 5 to low 600 rwhp to be running safe and have the least chance to blow the motor (pending a good tune).

So people dont usually start lifting heads until 18 or so psi or more correct? Well theres not a turbo out there that you can run 18 lbs on without it being super innefficent and make high 5xxrwhp.

most people run 8 lbs on stock bottom end, maybe a bit more if they are confident in the tune/gas. Thats my point.
Old 04-14-2008, 08:20 PM
  #55  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
speedracer5532's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Berkeley Springs, WV
Posts: 920
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by N4cer
Are we saying this is impressive? Anthony Peck put down nearly 900hp through unworked 317's.
You have to be a dumbass to make a statement like that.
Old 04-14-2008, 08:26 PM
  #56  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (17)
 
ZL1Killa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NC - Charlotte area
Posts: 3,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tony Mamo @ AFR
Thanks guys....
Good stuff....Im envious once again of the potential a well set up boosted car has....its just insane really.

Tony
in a perfectly setup and built motor with close attention to details it is truly crazy what power it outputs
Old 04-14-2008, 10:06 PM
  #57  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
N4cer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ashland, KY
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by speedracer5532
You have to be a dumbass to make a statement like that.
Theres a mature response. Prime example of why cousins shouldn't breed.
Old 04-15-2008, 01:33 AM
  #58  
TECH Regular
 
TopFlite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 415 Northern CA
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

This gives me great hope for my build. I was thinking I would have a hard time obtaining 640 rwhp with a 383 stroker kit mated with a 90mm single turbo at about 18-19psi. Very encouraging numbers for staying with stock cubes!!
Old 04-15-2008, 01:39 AM
  #59  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
ninetres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mufflerville, CA
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by N4cer
Theres a mature response. Prime example of why cousins shouldn't breed.
Speedracer was right, your comment was stupid and completely unrelated......in a thread that actually had some VERY interesting information/findings/opinions.
Old 04-15-2008, 06:37 AM
  #60  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
speedracer5532's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Berkeley Springs, WV
Posts: 920
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I knew I shouldn't of wasted my time making a comment to N4cer since he obviously doesn't have a clue but you can only read so much stupid **** before you say something.

BTW Tony, VERY IMPRESSIVE reults.


Quick Reply: Boosted 346 w/ AFR 225's cracks 800 RWHP!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:56 AM.