Fueling & Injection Fuel Pumps | Injectors | Rails | Regulators | Tanks

Injector duty question..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-04-2010, 02:41 PM
  #1  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
BLUEBYU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Injector duty question..

I am currently maxxing my injectors @ 100% at about 6300 rpm. If you know the IPW at this point...can you work backwards to determine what injectors will get this down in the 80% range?
Old 06-05-2010, 12:44 AM
  #2  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
BLUEBYU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Techies.....need help here. thanks.
Old 06-05-2010, 01:21 AM
  #3  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (33)
 
JonCR96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Asheboro, NC
Posts: 3,008
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

The number that the PCM comes up with is calculated and not actually measured to it may or may not be exact.

What injectors do you have? I've seen a heads/cam car that was hitting 100% around 4700 on stock 28s drop to around mid 50% max with some green top fords.
Old 06-05-2010, 08:40 AM
  #4  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
69LT1Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Lapeer, MI
Posts: 2,310
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Just call FIC and they will get you the right injectors.
Old 06-05-2010, 10:17 AM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (77)
 
black98ws6ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: louisville,ky
Posts: 2,107
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Why would you care about getting it down to 80%? Get some that will be plenty big enough in case of future modding.
Old 06-05-2010, 11:52 AM
  #6  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
BLUEBYU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I currently am running SVO 30's, which scale between 36 and 40#. If you do the injector flow calculation based on 450 rwhp (~575 bhp) it comes in around 39# at 80% duty. So I should be ok? I was getting ready to put some green tops on, but I have read where you can have some tuning issues with too big of an injector rating. The SVO 42's scale in the 52 to 57 # range would be maybe too big?
Old 06-05-2010, 11:56 AM
  #7  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
BLUEBYU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by black98ws6ta
Why would you care about getting it down to 80%? Get some that will be plenty big enough in case of future modding.
I am just wanting to get a range established at 80% and go a step higher with injector rating to allow some contingency.
Old 06-05-2010, 12:04 PM
  #8  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (33)
 
JonCR96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Asheboro, NC
Posts: 3,008
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BLUEBYU
I currently am running SVO 30's, which scale between 36 and 40#. If you do the injector flow calculation based on 450 rwhp (~575 bhp) it comes in around 39# at 80% duty. So I should be ok? I was getting ready to put some green tops on, but I have read where you can have some tuning issues with too big of an injector rating. The SVO 42's scale in the 52 to 57 # range would be maybe too big?
Also depends on your AFR if you're running lean you can get away with less than if you run a little rich.

The green tops are around 52 at 58psi and the reds are 36. If you're keeping your desired AFR inline than you should be alright for now on the reds but if you move up I would at least go with the greens. Neither of these injector are considered too big. You have to think that Ford runs the greens on a smaller motor which would need less fuel at idle and part throttle than an LS1.

Plus the fact that the FORD injectors have all the data readily available for tuning makes them an easy choice for me.
Old 06-05-2010, 12:21 PM
  #9  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
BLUEBYU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes the 42's scale from 52 to 57 with the data I have, which does not line up with a standard 3bar calculation.... more like Fords rating at 39.15. Confusing. I thought I was running fine with injector duty and went to the dyno for WOT tuning and found I was running lean.... set the AFR to 12.2-12.5 and my ID went to 100% at 6200 rpm and the HP curve was at about a 45 deg slope at 430 rwhp and still rising... this cam wants to run higher and need to make that happen. I may be out of pump also.

Last edited by BLUEBYU; 06-05-2010 at 12:37 PM.
Old 06-05-2010, 01:29 PM
  #10  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (33)
 
JonCR96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Asheboro, NC
Posts: 3,008
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BLUEBYU
Yes the 42's scale from 52 to 57 with the data I have, which does not line up with a standard 3bar calculation.... more like Fords rating at 39.15. Confusing. I thought I was running fine with injector duty and went to the dyno for WOT tuning and found I was running lean.... set the AFR to 12.2-12.5 and my ID went to 100% at 6200 rpm and the HP curve was at about a 45 deg slope at 430 rwhp and still rising... this cam wants to run higher and need to make that happen. I may be out of pump also.
Ford does rate them at 39psi.

If you are actually going lean on the dyno (not just from bad tuning) then I would look at the pump first. I've seen injectors go to 120% by the PCM and still keep up with my commanded AFR.

36lbs/hr injectors should be able to run 450rwhp all day long, if they are in good working order.
Old 06-05-2010, 03:48 PM
  #11  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
BuffJoeyD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 1985
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JonCR96Z
The number that the PCM comes up with is calculated and not actually measured to it may or may not be exact.
How is it a Calculated value? 20ms Pulse width @ 6000 rpm = wide open injector 100% cycle. Just because your AFRs keep up doesn't mean the injector isnt over its duty cycle.

You even stated " should work if the injectors is in good working order " That is the point of staying @ or below 80%. I am not an injectors expert but you are misleading anyone reading this post by saying 120% injector can keep up with your desired AFR- Safely.
Old 06-05-2010, 05:48 PM
  #12  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (33)
 
JonCR96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Asheboro, NC
Posts: 3,008
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BuffJoeyD
How is it a Calculated value? 20ms Pulse width @ 6000 rpm = wide open injector 100% cycle. Just because your AFRs keep up doesn't mean the injector isnt over its duty cycle.

You even stated " should work if the injectors is in good working order " That is the point of staying @ or below 80%. I am not an injectors expert but you are misleading anyone reading this post by saying 120% injector can keep up with your desired AFR- Safely.
I have no idea how it's calculated in the PCM, but obviously you won't really go over 100%. It's not like it's just going go lean after 100%. In my case, I've seen a car run at 120% and it was slightly richer than commanded.

The safety margin is there for safety. As with everything you can run it over the margin and you may not ever have trouble. You are would be over working.

And I said that red tops should be enough for 450 rwhp and a safety margin. Of course, every car and setup is different, but he should check the pump. If it's not pumping enough then the injector will have stay open longer for the same amount of fuel or it will just go lean.
Old 06-05-2010, 05:58 PM
  #13  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
BLUEBYU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes. I think the pump is the issue, because when I do VE tuning my LTFT histogram log data when pasted into the VE table keeps pushing the numbers higher than they should be (115-124).... What is my best option on the pump swap?
Old 06-06-2010, 06:58 PM
  #14  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (33)
 
JonCR96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Asheboro, NC
Posts: 3,008
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BLUEBYU
Yes. I think the pump is the issue, because when I do VE tuning my LTFT histogram log data when pasted into the VE table keeps pushing the numbers higher than they should be (115-124).... What is my best option on the pump swap?
Well for starters you can't tune WOT with fuel trims.
Old 06-06-2010, 07:15 PM
  #15  
TECH Resident
 
njc.corp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The ford 42 pound injector are a very good injector with a lot of head room and are easy to control----

the % data is a calculated guess of the injector flow rate table-been caught out to many times thinking i need a bigger injector....

if really unsure log the afr to see if you have control vs your fuel pressure- vs your commanded
Old 06-07-2010, 02:31 PM
  #16  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
BLUEBYU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JonCR96Z
Well for starters you can't tune WOT with fuel trims.

I should have been more clear....this VE table tuning was for PT up to 4000rpm range and kept pushing the values higher each time I pasted the LTFT histogram, which had +10 corrections.
Old 06-07-2010, 03:27 PM
  #17  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (33)
 
JonCR96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Asheboro, NC
Posts: 3,008
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BLUEBYU
I should have been more clear....this VE table tuning was for PT up to 4000rpm range and kept pushing the values higher each time I pasted the LTFT histogram, which had +10 corrections.
Did you disable the MAF?
Old 06-07-2010, 04:03 PM
  #18  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
BLUEBYU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes. Set the value to zero..... I did not change the DTC's to 0-MIL on First Error though. Would that be causing this problem also.
Old 06-07-2010, 05:18 PM
  #19  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
BLUEBYU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA
Posts: 933
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I just discovered that you needed to set the codes.



Quick Reply: Injector duty question..



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:06 PM.