Does E85 make sense in this situation?
With forced induction, does E85 offer any value here? I believe with the right tune and boost, 93 pump gas will reach the limits of this stock motor.
What would be the benefits of running E85? ignore fuel economy/fuel cost. Maybe less stress (boost, etc) on the motor for same power output or other?
I am struggling if i should upgrade the fuel system for E85. I dont plan on having the internals of the motor upgraded.
Thanks
I am going the supercharger route. At this power level (stock motor, street car, longevity is key ) with no intention on upgrading internals, is a smaller SC , say the LSA 1.9lL more optimal in terms of streetability, low RPM torque/HP vs a 3L whipple? Whipple has a nice inverted 3L supercharger. But it is 2-3x the cost of LSA SC.
And Wegener sells it with there front drive package.
Or i could go the more affordable route of a single belt system from CVF racing and LSA SC. About half the price overall.
Thanks again,
Trending Topics
And any thoughts on going the Whipple route. Have seen great reviews and performance on Mustangs but this Gen 6 whipple LSX version is a new product
I have been struggling to find a complete (or assembly of parts) LSA SC for less than 5k. Including reinforced brick. Not interested in Used stuff.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
If you're looking to make 600-650 horsepower, LSA blower and 93 octane with some good supporting mods will be just fine.
If you're wanting to make 850+, I'd go with at least the 3.0 whipple and E85.
You won’t be anywhere near where the motor wants timing wise with pump gas and any decent amount of boost. You’ll be severely knock limited well before that long block is tapped out. That’s the benefit of E85.
Whipple blowers also make a ton of heat and you are expending quite a bit of power to turn them. So more boost is needed to offset the losses…. Which makes more heat. Those blowers also make stupid power at low rpm that’s not useable for most, and hard on things bottom end and knock/tune wise. Which is why the LS9 came with a cam that basically neutered the motor below 5k. Which is what you want with that type of blower. You want a cam that really comes online at 6k+. It keeps the driveline alive and makes the power band more useable on the street. Esp if you run a street tire. They make no sense to me personally. You pay 5x the amount of a turbo kit and get less performance per pound and more heat to manage. They are great on tiny motors with limited power down low… like a 4.8. But slapping a big Whipple on a 480hp LS3 with a decent cam and pump gas goals seems like a waste of time and money. Much easier/cheaper way to spin tires.
And any thoughts on going the Whipple route. Have seen great reviews and performance on Mustangs but this Gen 6 whipple LSX version is a new product
I have been struggling to find a complete (or assembly of parts) LSA SC for less than 5k. Including reinforced brick. Not interested in Used stuff.
But at my hp objectives, say 750 , the lsa would be the most cost effective. And could get there on 93 gas alone . But will build for e85 as well.
And prefer the quicker torque response over turbo. This is a street car and it will be very rare i run over 6k rpm
Thanks for the reply. Newbie here still learning.
Your turbo worries are mostly newbie thoughts/myths. All the power adders could get you to 750 on 93 gas alone. That blower is about the furthest from cost effective there is! It’s also the least efficient, as it will take more boost to hit the same power goal! Gotta remember it takes HP to drive a blower. Also that design is less efficient than a turbo at compressing air. So you lose like 15-20%+ of your power due to heat and power draw to turn the thing. So you’ll have to run 2-3psi+ more boost to make the same power at the wheels as a turbo setup would.
The lag myth is very application specific. You are only wanting 270ish additional HP. That’s like 8-10psi with a small frame turbo on that motor. Size the turbo correctly with the correct converter and there will be zero lag.
You don’t want 600+ftlb at 3000rpm. It isn’t usable on the street and its really hard on the motor. Low rpm and big power breaks things. Your motor would be MUCH healthier if you cammed it to make power to 7k and brought in the majority of the power progressively after 5k. That’s impossible to do with the blower you are looking at.
As an example with a dedicated ladder bar drag car, I was pulling TONS of power with a 30” slick on my turbo 4.8 to get it to hook on the street. Down to single digit timing for 3 seconds on the launch and not even activating the boost controller till 60mph to get it to hook. Instant power at low RPM is useless on the street past a certain point. Esp. on any sort of street tire. Once you hit the point you can spin the tires, adding more power makes you slower.
Just a thought anyway. Either would be a fun.











