HP Supported with -8 compared to -10?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

May 18, 2005 | 01:32 AM

CAT3

Thread Starter

Restricted User

iTrader: (9)

Joined: Sep 2002

Posts: 7,603

Likes: 0

From: Sierra Vista, AZ

HP Supported with -8 compared to -10?

Whats the ballpark fwhp of each -8 and -10 lines? I am about to get the components together for FI setup. Thanks.

Charlie

May 18, 2005 | 06:01 PM

CAT3

Thread Starter

Restricted User

iTrader: (9)

Joined: Sep 2002

Posts: 7,603

Likes: 0

From: Sierra Vista, AZ

Hmm???? Someone has to have this info...FWIW Think I will go -10 (5/8") so there is room to grow if needed.

May 18, 2005 | 06:45 PM

onfire

Coal Mining Director

iTrader: (17)

Joined: Nov 2001

Posts: 4,442

Likes: 0

From: Virginia

-8 will take you to 1000rwhp.... (as a minimum). Just depends what your goals are.

May 19, 2005 | 12:55 AM

CAT3

Thread Starter

Restricted User

iTrader: (9)

Joined: Sep 2002

Posts: 7,603

Likes: 0

From: Sierra Vista, AZ

Well **** then, will only have to go with -8. Saves me a whole $3.36 for the aluminum tubing. Thanks. I only need about 650-750rwhp. I just dont want to do it on a stock line. Stock tank is bad enough without the sump. time to go e-shopping.

May 19, 2005 | 01:34 AM

Wicked_Hugger99

TECH Addict

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Apr 2004

Posts: 2,227

Likes: 1

From: enterprise, AL

-8 is what i got i think.
You decide on a pump yet CAT3?

May 19, 2005 | 02:20 AM

CAT3

Thread Starter

Restricted User

iTrader: (9)

Joined: Sep 2002

Posts: 7,603

Likes: 0

From: Sierra Vista, AZ

which pump are you using with your new setup. btw, have you posted pics of the SE kit? I remember reading you were doing it, but havent searched for many pics.

May 19, 2005 | 02:26 AM

Wicked_Hugger99

TECH Addict

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Apr 2004

Posts: 2,227

Likes: 1

From: enterprise, AL

now im running 2 bosch 420s w/ the turbo setup. As soon as i get the SS back i'll be posting pics and a vid but i'll need someone to host them for me
Was supposed to get it this thursday but the photo shoot for gmhtp has been delayed yet again

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Verdad Gallardo

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Pouria Savadkouei

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Verdad Gallardo

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Verdad Gallardo

Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

Verdad Gallardo

10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

Verdad Gallardo

Five Reasons the Camaro Was the Most Pivotal Player in the Pony Car Wars 2.0

Brett Foote

10 Reasons the LS7 Is GM's Most Extreme Naturally Aspirated V8 Engine Ever

Verdad Gallardo

May 22, 2005 | 02:59 PM

69firebird

TECH Addict

iTrader: (14)

Joined: Nov 2002

Posts: 2,560

Likes: 0

From: hurst tx

did you need both of those 420's?

I have dual intank 255's and I though I was going to be ok with that, but now im thinking I may need more fuel.
ed
firebird455@gmail.com

May 22, 2005 | 03:56 PM

#10

Wicked_Hugger99

TECH Addict

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Apr 2004

Posts: 2,227

Likes: 1

From: enterprise, AL

Quote:

Originally Posted by 69firebird

did you need both of those 420's?

I have dual intank 255's and I though I was going to be ok with that, but now im thinking I may need more fuel.
ed
firebird455@gmail.com

i guess the folks at Speed inc thought so. it was dual 340s on the vortech setup but maybe the turbo setup was maxin them out but i dunno.