The "other" other 10-bolt?
the Chevy, and the BOP (Buick/Olds/
Pontiac).
If I recall correctly, the BOP was a
non-C-clip design. It also stood up
behind the 455s pretty reliably. The
BOP 455s weren't usually high revvers but
made some monster torque, >500 lb-ft
on some of 'em.
Never see anyone rigging these for the
early or late F-bodies the same way
they do the 12-bolts, but I think they
are similarly stout (Chevy 12 vs BOP 10).
Maybe it's the lack of cores?
Just wondering why the 8.5" rears aren't
used more. I guess maybe if you're gonna
spend, people only want the ultimate?
your everyday heads and cam cars putting down under 450 ft lbs whoudl be no match for a 8.5 assuming its set up right and there are not any bad parts in it.
why arent they used more? because its a serious pain in the buttocks to have one set up for the newer f-bods, and most compaines would probalby rather stick to one rear end (within the confines of GM, obviously some also make the Ford 9 and Dana) rather than have to tool up to make a 12 bolt, which will be more for the hard core sector of the market, and the 8.5 which would be more for the masses. If they did both rears the cost of both would problaby go up fairly considerably. especialy when you think about the fact that at least one company (moser) casts F body specific housings with the torque arm boss. I assume they chose to go with the 12 bolt simply because it will be adequate for the hard core guys, and the everyday car can also use them with little disadvantage, where the 10 bolt would have breakage problems behind a few of the more intense cars.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time






