402hp 406tq stock dyno 2010ss
09-26-2009, 07:25 PM
#23
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Stafford TX
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I believe we did 4 pulls. Starting out at almost 390rwhp.
Some people are amazing to think that this is IMPOSSIBLE. Why would we try to JACK UP our baseline numbers?? Wouldnt you think we would fudge them to make them look lower so when we do our package it will pick up ungodly amounts like a few other shops have done??
Some people are amazing to think that this is IMPOSSIBLE. Why would we try to JACK UP our baseline numbers?? Wouldnt you think we would fudge them to make them look lower so when we do our package it will pick up ungodly amounts like a few other shops have done??
09-26-2009, 07:29 PM
#24
That's a good point, but it's just a little odd seeing it dyno 30-40whp more than other stock 5th gens on this stie. Are you going to get track times with it to see what it runs before and after you mod? It would be something else if it ran a mid 12 bone stock.
09-26-2009, 08:25 PM
#26
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Stafford TX
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We will go run it to get a baseline. Think about it though, most of the stock M6's are running 13.0-13.30 with good drivers. If this particular SS is making 30+- rwhp than the average LS3 SS M6, do you really think its going to pick up .5-.8 tenths? Lets be realistic, It takes alot more rwhp to pick up a gain that great. We will see though!
09-27-2009, 05:51 AM
#29
TECH Addict
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Port Saint Lucie,Florida
Posts: 2,767
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Mine made 371 rwhp stock and i would say that is about right.360-380 on the m6 seems what they be putting to the tire give or take what dyno it is and how the air temp is.
09-27-2009, 10:21 AM
#30
On The Tree
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: akron ohio
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For all you people calling bs the a6 will dyno less especially if its a camaro with the l99. figure around 340 rwhp for a a6 camaro and around 360 for the a6 vette. I have seen ls3 m6 camaro and vettes consistanly in the 380's so its not far fetched that one with gmpp catback could hit 402 rwhp. Either way the Ls3 is simply amazing. Best bang for the buck hands down. I'll take mine in a vette though because its a crapload faster then the camaro. My friends bone stock ls3 m6 corvette runs 12.3x @ 120mph!
09-29-2009, 09:54 AM
#33
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Stafford TX
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
DynoJet Dynamometers Model 248C
09-29-2009, 10:23 AM
#34
Teching In
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I understand. Our Chassis Dyno was calibrated at time of installation approximately 9 months ago. We have dyno'd 7 M6 LS3 SS's in the last 2 months and all of them have been between 360-380rwhp depending on mileage. Then this one started off at 380rwhp on the first pull straight off the street from a 50+ mile drive. Two days later we did a baseline on another M6 that we are going to be doing another one of our Procharger packages on and it made 368rwhp completely stock (No GMPP exhaust) so this confirms that our dyno is in "average" with most, even yours. The particular SS being spoken of in this thread is approx 25+- rwhp higher than most completely stock ones with its GMPP axleback exhaust. Put the factory mufflers back on and it will probably put down about 387-392rwhp (we have seen axle-backs pick up 10-15rwhp without any tuning). That would mean out of the numerous LS3 M6's that we have dyno'd here, this SS is about 15+-rwhp higher. Not far fetched. Seen that for years with stock LS1 F-bodies, C5's, C6's, and even trucks.
DynoJet Dynamometers Model 248C
DynoJet Dynamometers Model 248C
Just bought a 2010ss camaro and took it to Iconautosports and dyno a 402hp and 406tq. Will be posting dyno sheet soon. Now its time for some bolt-on's AND A CAM. Stay tune for results!!!
Sorry if I butted in, those are numbers we see with Headers.
09-29-2009, 11:42 AM
#35
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Stafford TX
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stay tune for results!!!I wish I could call BS too but I dynoed it my self. The car does have the dealer installed GM performance catback on it, we let it cool down for quite a while, we just had a cold front move in so the IATs had to be pretty low, and the owner beat the crap out of it over the weekend before we dynoed it to break it in. I dont know what else to say. As for the happy dyno, every other 2010 M6 camaro we have dynoed average around the 370s like everyone else. I can asure you that if we were to put the factory catback on it and dyno it in 100 degree weather like all the others we dynoed lately, the numbers would be alot lower. Ill post up the dyno sheet tomorrow so yall can check it out.
09-29-2009, 04:52 PM
#38
On The Tree
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Friendswood, Tx
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Done, I will bring it Mike and see how ur dyno reads. I think that the confussion was that it was said to be stock and it has the dealer installed exhaust on it which gains the extra 10-15. I'm just amazed at it b/c my A6 vette made 350rwhp and I thought the vettes ls3 had more power then the Camaro.
