Gen 5 Camaro External Bolt-On Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2010 Camaro owners. What do you dislike about it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-08-2010 | 10:22 PM
  #1  
01ls1lover's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club

iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 0
From: Nor Cal
Default 2010 Camaro owners. What do you dislike about it?

What do you dislike about the new Camaro? Do you think it is worth the money performance wise over everything on the market? Such as the new 5.0 Challenger etc.. I don't want arguiments just some FACTS..
Old 11-08-2010 | 10:25 PM
  #2  
ss1129's Avatar
12 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 25
From: Ft Lupton, CO
Default

Performance wise yes. It IMO has a lot more potential and wakes up with a few mods.

What do I dislike?

20" wheels with big brembos standard on the ss. They should offer a v6 brake option for cheaper.

More options but less packages. Its hard to get only what you want.

Some sort of gear option would of gone a long way too IMO.

Oh and the paint quality sucks. At least it did for the first years. It chips like a ****.
Old 11-08-2010 | 10:35 PM
  #3  
weaklt1's Avatar
On The Tree

iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Default

yes the paint sucks,but they are supposed to use a different paint now or soon. also, the sun visors are useless, besides that the car is a very nice and comfortable ride. It gets a lot of attention and can be woken up quite easily. Drives more like a Cadillac than a 4th gen,nice and quiet.
Old 11-08-2010 | 11:25 PM
  #4  
01ls1lover's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club

iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 0
From: Nor Cal
Default

What needs "wokin up" I know changing the exhuast on my Formy really helped. What key parts of the LS3 are slugish and need replacing?
Old 11-08-2010 | 11:57 PM
  #5  
SS#1531's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: Alamogordo, NM
Default

Weighs too much and it's a little too big. Exhaust is too quiet. Needs a performance gear option.

Everything else is full of win!
Old 11-09-2010 | 12:34 AM
  #6  
Frogger's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Default

I see them around all the time

-way too quiet, but has true duals at least
-v-sis,rs,ss all look the same to average people. "another new camaro everyone! look!"
-no live axle
-ugly from the rear IMO. looks like the engine could be back there like a ferrari 360
-LS3 comes to life with intake, lts, cat back(more for sound as the stock is pretty straight foward), and a tune
-still too heavy. 3900+ i think compared to 4th gen 3400=3500

list goes on. Point is for that money you can have a really quick 3rd or 4th gen. then again, in new cars everything works real nice like
Old 11-09-2010 | 12:51 AM
  #7  
formula vincent's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Default

engine is fine where its sits .no need to move it . i own a 94 lt1 bird
engine compartment .very tight .. as far as weight ..is concerned the camaro
is 300 lbs lighter than the challenger . when my money is "right " im going to
get a new camaro im having too much of a love hate thing with my 94 bird
the new car makes the previous car look downright old.

Last edited by formula vincent; 11-09-2010 at 12:57 AM.
Old 11-09-2010 | 08:48 AM
  #8  
Slowhawk's Avatar
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 14,865
Likes: 6
From: Bridgewater,Ma
Default

Biggest complaint is it's too heavy.Could lose 400lbs.

Performance wise - they like headers and cold air setup's.Then of course tuning to get rid of the TM ect.
Old 11-09-2010 | 12:14 PM
  #9  
01ls1lover's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club

iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 0
From: Nor Cal
Default

The weight is the big issue with me. I am not a fan of removing interior and lot's of the other bs to make it faster.
How is the handling on the camaro? I know my Formy was a nose diver in corners but some sub frames and a strut brace tightened her up very nice..
Old 11-09-2010 | 08:20 PM
  #10  
ULTIMATEORANGESS's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,975
Likes: 17
From: eatontown,nj
Default

hows fuel mileage?
Old 11-09-2010 | 08:31 PM
  #11  
Never Satisfied's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: Lafayette In.
Default

Weight and yet another inferior rear end in a Camaro. Everything else I like
Old 11-09-2010 | 09:09 PM
  #12  
UltraZLS1's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 55
From: Hanover, Michigan
Default

Dislikes- Visibility for sure but you get used to it.. Paint is looking questionable so far.

Likes...everything else. (especially the performance) It matches my h/c 98 in the acceleration department and it only has bolt ons. Handling is by far superior to my 98 z-28 and the ride quality is phenomenal. A set of springs and swaybars sends the handling performance sky high from what I have read.

My combined mpg for the past 3 months has been 18.7 and hasnt moved. I dont think I have driven the car once and not mashed the pedal. I dont beat the **** out of the car....but I would say I drive it like most people would drive a sports car. My driving is probably about 50/50 city and highway.

My highway mpg is around 23-24 last time I checked on a long trip.

Weight is another disadvantage...the 1SS M6 is 3849 stock. I have removed the entire factory exhaust system and have aftermarket...I should be close to 3800 even with a full tank. and near 3700 with a 1/8th tank. But I weigh 235...so I am not helping anything.
Old 11-09-2010 | 10:04 PM
  #13  
ss1129's Avatar
12 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 25
From: Ft Lupton, CO
Default

Originally Posted by UltraZLS1
Dislikes- Visibility for sure but you get used to it.. Paint is looking questionable so far.

Likes...everything else. (especially the performance) It matches my h/c 98 in the acceleration department and it only has bolt ons. Handling is by far superior to my 98 z-28 and the ride quality is phenomenal. A set of springs and swaybars sends the handling performance sky high from what I have read.

My combined mpg for the past 3 months has been 18.7 and hasnt moved. I dont think I have driven the car once and not mashed the pedal. I dont beat the **** out of the car....but I would say I drive it like most people would drive a sports car. My driving is probably about 50/50 city and highway.

My highway mpg is around 23-24 last time I checked on a long trip.

Weight is another disadvantage...the 1SS M6 is 3849 stock. I have removed the entire factory exhaust system and have aftermarket...I should be close to 3800 even with a full tank. and near 3700 with a 1/8th tank. But I weigh 235...so I am not helping anything.
I dont think a m6 1ss is 3849. Thats what my a6 2ss weighed.
Old 11-09-2010 | 11:03 PM
  #14  
UltraZLS1's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 55
From: Hanover, Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by ss1129
I dont think a m6 1ss is 3849. Thats what my a6 2ss weighed.
GM curb weight for the 2SS m6 is listed at 3860 per GM. 1SS is at 3849 from what I can gather.

2SS A6 is 3910 I believe.

Curb weight is with a full tank and all fluids (ready to drive)

Your A6 2SS stock would not be 3849 with a full tank. A full tank of gas is worth about ~100 lbs. (depending on tank size). The curb weight is 3900-3910 for an A6 2SS.
Old 11-09-2010 | 11:08 PM
  #15  
Dark SS's Avatar
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 1
From: Illinois
Default

Performance is awesome IMO, no complaints there. It would be nice if it was a little lighter but I can live with the weight.

Downside is that it's hard to launch in stock form with IRS and 20" rims. Pirelli's suck IMO. I wish there was a gear option from the factory. My biggest annoyance is no memory seat, that really pisses me off for a brand new $36K car.

Other than that I have no complaints and the car has amazed me at the strip and on the street.
Old 11-09-2010 | 11:16 PM
  #16  
01ls1lover's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club

iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 0
From: Nor Cal
Default

What 1/4 times are you guys getting BONE stock?
Old 11-10-2010 | 12:49 AM
  #17  
ss1129's Avatar
12 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 25
From: Ft Lupton, CO
Default

Originally Posted by UltraZLS1
GM curb weight for the 2SS m6 is listed at 3860 per GM. 1SS is at 3849 from what I can gather.

2SS A6 is 3910 I believe.

Curb weight is with a full tank and all fluids (ready to drive)

Your A6 2SS stock would not be 3849 with a full tank. A full tank of gas is worth about ~100 lbs. (depending on tank size). The curb weight is 3900-3910 for an A6 2SS.
You're right. I weighed my car bone stock with 1/2 tank and it was 3860.

But, its 3680 now with a half tank.
Old 11-10-2010 | 06:39 AM
  #18  
ULTIMATEORANGESS's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,975
Likes: 17
From: eatontown,nj
Default

Originally Posted by ss1129
You're right. I weighed my car bone stock with 1/2 tank and it was 3860.

But, its 3680 now with a half tank.
did you take some weight off it?
Old 11-10-2010 | 08:16 AM
  #19  
ss1129's Avatar
12 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 25
From: Ft Lupton, CO
Default

Originally Posted by ULTIMATEORANGESS
did you take some weight off it?
Yeah, but nothing you would notice by looking at it. Exhaust was a lot of that.
Old 11-10-2010 | 06:28 PM
  #20  
2SSARME's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 78
Likes: 19
From: I'm a Moderator
Default

Weight.
IRS.
AFM.



Originally Posted by 01ls1lover
What 1/4 times are you guys getting BONE stock?

13.3@106 in my auto on the worst track ever.


Quick Reply: 2010 Camaro owners. What do you dislike about it?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:31 PM.