autoblog.com's got a blue v6
04-22-2009, 11:48 AM
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
autoblog.com's got a blue v6 Autoblog has a story today about the v6 Camaro they were loaned to review:
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/22/t...-camaro-v6-rs/
Of interest, it's blue- guess those blue cars are not too far away now.
here is one of their 36 pictures:
also here's their take on v6 vs stang GT: "Note, however, that same seat-of-the-pants impression we just mentioned also tells us that aspiring stoplight heroes may still want to think twice before goading Mustang GT drivers in the adjacent lane. The temptation to do so will surely be there, as the 3.6-liter DI V6 is no pretender, but a S197 Mustang still feels a shade quicker than the heavier, autobox-equipped V6 Camaro does. Then again, we're comparing a base-engined, six-cylinder Camaro to the V8 Mustang GT on equal ground. How times have changed – for the better."
http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/22/t...-camaro-v6-rs/
Of interest, it's blue- guess those blue cars are not too far away now.
here is one of their 36 pictures:
also here's their take on v6 vs stang GT: "Note, however, that same seat-of-the-pants impression we just mentioned also tells us that aspiring stoplight heroes may still want to think twice before goading Mustang GT drivers in the adjacent lane. The temptation to do so will surely be there, as the 3.6-liter DI V6 is no pretender, but a S197 Mustang still feels a shade quicker than the heavier, autobox-equipped V6 Camaro does. Then again, we're comparing a base-engined, six-cylinder Camaro to the V8 Mustang GT on equal ground. How times have changed – for the better."
Last edited by sectari; 04-22-2009 at 12:21 PM. Reason: 36 pics, not 26
