2010 Camaro PROTOTYPE - Here it is!
I wonder what they did with the fuel filler cap. That was one of the things I liked on the concept that I hoped would make it. Probably some federal rule says you can't have it where it was.
Teching In
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
and put back the concepts side mirrors back on!
TECH Junkie
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,877
Likes: 0
From: Gulf Shores and DC
Glad the fuel filler will be on the starboard side.
The gaps look rather substantial on the white car.
It sits too high. It also look fatter and not as low, long, and wide as the prototype...but then again it may just be the angle. The mini dick and sunroof look bad.
Hopefully in another color with a spoiler it will look cooler (funny thing is I always hate Mustangs with spoilers).
W
The gaps look rather substantial on the white car.
It sits too high. It also look fatter and not as low, long, and wide as the prototype...but then again it may just be the angle. The mini dick and sunroof look bad.
Hopefully in another color with a spoiler it will look cooler (funny thing is I always hate Mustangs with spoilers).
W
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo
holy crap, you guys bitch more than a bunch of school girls putting on makeup in the bathroom.
t-tops SUCK, with a capital S. they never seal right in one way or another, the whole trunk is taken up when they are off, you look at one wrong and the latch breaks. I'll take a moonroof over ts any day, and a hard top over both.
t-tops SUCK, with a capital S. they never seal right in one way or another, the whole trunk is taken up when they are off, you look at one wrong and the latch breaks. I'll take a moonroof over ts any day, and a hard top over both.
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 34,628
Likes: 2,543
From: Schiller Park, ILL Member: #317
Someone needs to get the message to GM. On-star + Camaro =
I could learn to live with it, if it wasn't for the awful fin. 
As far as the sunroof, I'm sure that'll be optional, personally I want a hardtop car.
However, go look at any C6 Corvette (which also has OnStar as standard equipment), and try to find the OnStar antenna.
See my point?
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 34,628
Likes: 2,543
From: Schiller Park, ILL Member: #317
Seems like I've seen C6s with some kind of similar thing attached to the back of the roof, or maybe it was on the trunk of a C6 'vert. If that's not for On-star, was it for XM or something?
I hope they hide the damn thing like you suggest. I know it seems silly to get upset about such a small thing, but it's seriously a big issue to me. I hate silly crap stuck on my cars like that.
TECH Junkie
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,877
Likes: 0
From: Gulf Shores and DC
I know it is a prototype...that is why I am bitching as loud as I can. If we complain while the camaro is still have a prototype they can change things. If we bitch at a production model it will take forever to get something changed. One way or another I will have this or a Challenger...so I want a product as good as possible.
W
W
TECH Veteran
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ Hometown: Aberdeen, SD
GM has been trumping Chrysler recently in their ability to bring concepts to the showroom virtually unchanged. Look at the Solstice, Sky, and Enclave. The Camaro will look just as good when it's finished and ready for sale.
Ditch the onstar thing and it's fine. I'm glad to see a sunroof rather then the damn t tops, I hate those things. I guarintee the sunroof will be an option, after 2001 the t tops weren't, you really didn't have a choice (at least with transam's anyway)
I commend them for not doing t tops, because the body will be alot stronger, not it's not designed with a removable piece above the doors, and isn't designed to work with or without that piece in the picture.
I commend them for not doing t tops, because the body will be alot stronger, not it's not designed with a removable piece above the doors, and isn't designed to work with or without that piece in the picture.
They're not gonna do T-tops because it would screw up the side profile.
That dorsal fin antenna definitely requires a hole, so hopefully they'll change that.
Reverse lights should be moved to the license plate area like the C5...
It'll look better when they get a ducktail and some badges on it.
That dorsal fin antenna definitely requires a hole, so hopefully they'll change that.
Reverse lights should be moved to the license plate area like the C5...
It'll look better when they get a ducktail and some badges on it.