2010 Camaro PROTOTYPE - Here it is!
#121
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Shreveport,Louisiana
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I thought it was gonna be a true hardtop like the concept .
This white one looks like a stripper six cylinder model with duals which ain't a bad thing . The moonroof looks ok to me as long as it goes back on the outside . If not it will take up about 2 - 2 1/2" of headroom & it already looks like the top has been chopped .
This white one looks like a stripper six cylinder model with duals which ain't a bad thing . The moonroof looks ok to me as long as it goes back on the outside . If not it will take up about 2 - 2 1/2" of headroom & it already looks like the top has been chopped .
#125
On The Tree
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: dover delaware
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Idon't like the sunroof,OnStar. The mirrors are different (like the concept better), and the door handles are not great either. They just don't follow the body lines of the car IMO.
#126
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Missouri
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Over all it feels less pronounced, and more rounded off than the concept. I credit GM for staying "true" to the concept, but I'm honestly not liking the mirror, or the new rear-end. I hate to say this, but it's kind of looking like everything else GM makes.
#127
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: St.Louis
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I am generally happy with the retro car. If i was to get one i will get a vert. Thats just me. Opinions...... I agree that the reverse lights need to be addressed along with the ability to put some meaty tires on the back. I am not a fan of the gauge cluster (if you call that a cluster). Why cant they put the gauges by the shifter up above the wheel and give this thing a heads up display? Also in mentioning display.....there should be a navi system in it. Almost all cars over 20k now-a-days have it. Built in onstar and xm FTW... all of that built into a touch screen navi sys would be biotch!
We are all big fans of power. IMO the z-28 should be quite powerful with a SS option of approx 50+ more horsepower motor. z = 400hp at least and the SS with +450 would be a great start to a new camaro line.
The price is going to be a struggle for most.... If they price it with mustangs they wont make money.... well maybe some but not enough to justify making it for years to come. I am all about keeping the cost low but how can they? I probably wont buy a new one off the lot..... I will wait until someone else who has money buys it and takes the initial hit.....then i wil buy a used one with 20k on it..... but thats just me cuz i'm poor.![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
Thats my .02 on the car.
We are all big fans of power. IMO the z-28 should be quite powerful with a SS option of approx 50+ more horsepower motor. z = 400hp at least and the SS with +450 would be a great start to a new camaro line.
The price is going to be a struggle for most.... If they price it with mustangs they wont make money.... well maybe some but not enough to justify making it for years to come. I am all about keeping the cost low but how can they? I probably wont buy a new one off the lot..... I will wait until someone else who has money buys it and takes the initial hit.....then i wil buy a used one with 20k on it..... but thats just me cuz i'm poor.
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
Thats my .02 on the car.