Gen 6 Camaro 2016+ Forum The forum for discussion of the 6th Gen 2016+ Camaro

16 camaro specs revealed! 3685 lbs 0-60 4.0 1/4 mile 12.3@116

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-14-2015 | 01:12 AM
  #1  
UltraZLS1's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 55
From: Hanover, Michigan
Default GM press release-16 camaro specs- 3,685lb 1SS 0-60 4.0 1/4 mile 12.3 @ 116mph

http://media.gm.com/media/us/en/chev...14-camaro.html


http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=423278


Drink it in boys....drink it in...it always goes down smooth.

Last edited by UltraZLS1; 09-14-2015 at 01:20 AM.
Old 09-14-2015 | 04:04 AM
  #2  
UltraZLS1's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 55
From: Hanover, Michigan
Default 16 camaro specs revealed! 3685 lbs 0-60 4.0 1/4 mile 12.3@116

http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=423278


Hell fuc!ing yes GM. Way to go.
Old 09-14-2015 | 04:24 AM
  #3  
HCI2000SS's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 11,138
Likes: 16
From: Howell & Fenton MI
Default

About time
Old 09-14-2015 | 06:12 AM
  #4  
ULTIMATEORANGESS's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,975
Likes: 17
From: eatontown,nj
Thumbs up

the fastest time was with a auto too! this car is nasty!
Old 09-14-2015 | 06:46 AM
  #5  
badformulaLS1's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 965
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Default

Damn.... GM definitely finally gave us what we wanted.

But, they claimed this car was a better road course performer than the 1LE but I'm not seeing it with those lateral G and braking numbers. If anything the lap times may be marginally quicker due solely to more power to use in the straights on some courses. Also not digging that fact that they stayed with 20" wheels.

But 12.3 at 116 is awesome. 3685lbs is awesome. This car is going to hurt major 5.bro feelings. Looking forward to seeing Ford counter back.
Old 09-14-2015 | 07:16 AM
  #6  
Lawhead's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 2
From: \
Default

Fif gens are about to be worth 3k a piece LoL

Awesome if this holds some what true in the real world
Old 09-14-2015 | 08:10 AM
  #7  
MuhThugga's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 276
From: Wilmington, De
Default

And with the SS starting at just under $38K, I won't be buying one.

Last edited by MuhThugga; 09-14-2015 at 08:57 AM.
Old 09-14-2015 | 09:08 AM
  #8  
99z28383's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Default

Looks like the turbo 4, V6 and LT1 Camaro will out perform all the same equipped mustangs. Surprised to see the less powerful turbo 4 out trap the ecoboost in the 1/4.
Old 09-14-2015 | 09:30 AM
  #9  
UltraZLS1's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 55
From: Hanover, Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by MuhThugga
And with the SS starting at just under $38K, I won't be buying one.
Sucks for you.

To be clear its 37,295 I think with destination.

You can always have a mustang gt with 235s and no brakes or cooling and a half second slower for 33k with destination. Get mistaken for a fusion at the same time and be slower than the last gen car

I'll happily spend the extra 4k. You get what u pay for.
Old 09-14-2015 | 09:32 AM
  #10  
UltraZLS1's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 55
From: Hanover, Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by 99z28383
Looks like the turbo 4, V6 and LT1 Camaro will out perform all the same equipped mustangs. Surprised to see the less powerful turbo 4 out trap the ecoboost in the 1/4.
The turbo 4 is 33xx lbs. sure that helps.

The v6 very nearly matches ls1 cars. 13.5@103
Old 09-14-2015 | 09:37 AM
  #11  
99z28383's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Default

The weight definitely helps, but to be down 35 horsepower and still trap higher tells me it's probably underrated.
Old 09-14-2015 | 10:07 AM
  #12  
loudblack97z71's Avatar
12 Second Club

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: New Smyrna Beach
Default

LT1 + 8speed auto = nasty

I almost bought a 2015 C7 Z51 for that reason but my cheapness couldn't pass on paying less than half for a 2012 with 20K miles still under warranty.
Old 09-14-2015 | 10:30 AM
  #13  
MuhThugga's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 276
From: Wilmington, De
Default

Originally Posted by UltraZLS1
Sucks for you.
It doesn't really suck for me. I'm quite content with my GTO, and GM has yet to build a car that makes me want to replace it.

Originally Posted by UltraZLS1
To be clear its 37,295 I think with destination.
Yes, $37,295 with cloth seats. What a sweet deal.

Originally Posted by UltraZLS1
You can always have a mustang gt with 235s and no brakes or cooling and a half second slower for 33k with destination. Get mistaken for a fusion at the same time and be slower than the last gen car

I'll happily spend the extra 4k. You get what u pay for.
I could get a Mustang GT. They are very nice cars, but I'm not blinded with Camaro fanboi-itis and can actually see that. I also prefer the looks of the Mustang over the Camaro, and have yet to confuse one for a Fusion.

I also test drove a new GT, and it stopped and handled just fine. Then again, I drove it with realistic expectations of driving it on the street and hold no illusion of thinking I'm in a muhfuggin racecar.
Old 09-14-2015 | 12:29 PM
  #14  
91Z28's Avatar
TECH Resident

 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
From: Midland
Default

I passed on the 5th gen due to the weight.......don't think I will be able to do the same this time around.

I always wanted an LS7 car though and the 5th Gen Z/28 tempted me pretty hard.....the question is, what will the 6th gen Z/28 have? Hopefully just a DI'd LS7 with 550-600hp as I prefer NA power. I almost want to pick up one of the last 2015 Z/28s but the 6th gen announcement has me excited for what the "special editions" will be capable of (the SS just wouldn't be enough).
Old 09-14-2015 | 01:15 PM
  #15  
99FRC's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Texas
Default

Resident Ford nut-swingers come on in. I'm bored at work today and could use a good laugh.
Old 09-14-2015 | 01:25 PM
  #16  
Mappinsj's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 812
Likes: 4
Default

Um. I can run that with bolt ons

-5.0
Old 09-14-2015 | 01:26 PM
  #17  
Mappinsj's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 812
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by loudblack97z71
LT1 + 8speed auto = nasty

I almost bought a 2015 C7 Z51 for that reason but my cheapness couldn't pass on paying less than half for a 2012 with 20K miles still under warranty.
My cheapness wouldn't allow that either
Old 09-14-2015 | 02:25 PM
  #18  
redtan's Avatar
TECH Junkie

iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 16
From: Belmont, MA
Default

You can always have a mustang gt with 235s and no brakes or cooling and a half second slower for 33k with destination.
Spec'd out a PP GT with Recaro seats for under $34k. Those stop and cool just as well as the Camaro which costs 5k more. And $5k in mods will obliterate any stock Camaro in terms of speed.

Your point is moot.
Old 09-14-2015 | 02:37 PM
  #19  
transamtom's Avatar
12 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 640
Likes: 11
From: Niagara Falls Ont. Canada
Default

Wow 12.3 at 116 is pretty sweet performance for under 40k.

Back in the 90's and early 2000's you needed 100k for a Viper to get that in a car.
Old 09-14-2015 | 04:09 PM
  #20  
RPM WS6's Avatar
LS1Tech Administrator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 32,726
Likes: 1,836
From: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Default

Impressive numbers, especially for the auto. Weight is also impressive, nice to see the trend towards ~4,000lbs starting to wane.

It's just too bad that the car doesn't look better. Camaro has been trailing Mustang in the styling department ever since the 2010 re-introduction IMO.


Quick Reply: 16 camaro specs revealed! 3685 lbs 0-60 4.0 1/4 mile 12.3@116



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:52 AM.