General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.

Best subframe connectors?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-27-2010, 08:19 PM
  #21  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,281
Likes: 0
Received 1,713 Likes on 1,228 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Striker
The 3 pointer's?
Yes.

I had 2-point weld-ins on a previous F-body, I didn't notice much improvement at all after installing them. But the 3-point bolt-ons on this car made a noticeable improvement in stiffness though.

With the better bolt-on designs (like SLP and UMI) there is really no need to weld. Some people complain about the bolts coming loose, but the only reason for that is if you don't get them tight enough in the first place. I used a pyramid of washers on each bolt so they wouldn't cave in, then took a 4ft. breaker bar to torque these things down so tight that they are truly formed to the frame. That was 5 years ago, they've never once come loose.
Old 04-27-2010, 08:56 PM
  #22  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (17)
 
HoLLo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rapid City, SD
Posts: 3,161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Striker
I have a nearly BONE STOCK car (check sig below) It's 99.99% of useage is on the street. Do I hammer it every now and then on the street, yes. I took the car to the track ONCE. Never did a crazy launch or anything of that nature...a few weeks later after a few more cruises and the occasional "spirited drive" that I wouldn't even remotely consider beating on the car, I notice I had torque dimples developing on my quarter panel.

I know that this wasn't done by anyone or anything else for that matter because I detail the car on a daily basis and it never gets left alone in a parking lot and things like that. So would SFC's have helped me in this instance? I'd definately say yes. Especially as the mileage increases and things start to get looser and looser.
Definitely agree with the mileage increase and loose ****. Makes me wonder about my 95k mile car that I have cammed with full bolt ons. But every single one of my next 5 mods are some sort of suspension/chassic. Just waiting on my old motor to sell.
Old 04-27-2010, 09:18 PM
  #23  
TECH Fanatic
 
FiredUpZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Elgin, Il
Posts: 1,285
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Suspension is where its at man. Makes the car feel more like it wants to just GO.
Old 04-27-2010, 09:26 PM
  #24  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
elias_799's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: toronto ontario canada
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FiredUpZ28
Suspension is where its at man. Makes the car feel more like it wants to just GO.
yea, but you can not "'GO'' without the power. you need to have a balance of both in a good car
Old 04-27-2010, 10:35 PM
  #25  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (34)
 
BlackDuk98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cleveland Ohio
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I looked at a few when I first started modding my car and was never really inrerested in bolt on ones. I looked at UMI and BMR and wasn't that thrilled with them either. I saw a few cars around here with J&M 3 point diamond subframe connectors and liked their design a lot better. They really hug the floor pan. Clear everything on my car (read someone on tech not being able to get their tranny out since they welded their connectors in) You cannot see them if you lay on the ground. They don't even go as low as the pinch welds on the car. Unfortunately I have no pics of them on my car. Just pieces of them in the pics since I was focusing on the bigger items

http://www.hotpart.com/shop/index.ph...ct_detail&p=56
Old 04-28-2010, 10:02 AM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Striker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RPM WS6
Yes.

I had 2-point weld-ins on a previous F-body, I didn't notice much improvement at all after installing them. But the 3-point bolt-ons on this car made a noticeable improvement in stiffness though.

With the better bolt-on designs (like SLP and UMI) there is really no need to weld. Some people complain about the bolts coming loose, but the only reason for that is if you don't get them tight enough in the first place. I used a pyramid of washers on each bolt so they wouldn't cave in, then took a 4ft. breaker bar to torque these things down so tight that they are truly formed to the frame. That was 5 years ago, they've never once come loose.
This is what I'm gonna go with even tho the car is a street car. UMI 3 point bolt in. It can't hurt. Did you ever go underneath the car after you installed the bolt ins to see how everything fit? It always concerned me as to weather or not the areas of the SFC's that meet the under carriage of the car (where you would bolt them in) will cause scratching+corrosion over time due to the metal vs. metal friction going on there.....
Old 04-28-2010, 10:03 AM
  #27  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Striker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HoLLo
Definitely agree with the mileage increase and loose ****. Makes me wonder about my 95k mile car that I have cammed with full bolt ons. But every single one of my next 5 mods are some sort of suspension/chassic. Just waiting on my old motor to sell.
Yeah man, the earlier you do it, the better it is for the car down the road in my honest opinion. It can't hurt anything at all having the 3 pointers bolted in.
Old 04-28-2010, 10:45 AM
  #28  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (18)
 
Jon@Texas-Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

We have probably run more boxed BMR subframes than any of them. However, we have installed everyone's and as long as you go with a good brand name you can't go wrong. SFC's are a good way to prevent annoying squeaks and rattles as well as prevent a lot of body flex. We definitely recommend them as one of your first mods to these cars!

Jon
Old 04-28-2010, 10:46 AM
  #29  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
BobDoLe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,510
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

i like them welded on personally. i have bmr's convertible subframe connectors which are welded along 3 spots on each side of the car, but do not connect to each other like the 3 point ones do. if i didn't have a convertible, for a less invasive approach which should be fine for street use, i'd probably go with a bolt-in 3 point.
Old 04-28-2010, 11:33 AM
  #30  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,281
Likes: 0
Received 1,713 Likes on 1,228 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Striker
This is what I'm gonna go with even tho the car is a street car. UMI 3 point bolt in. It can't hurt. Did you ever go underneath the car after you installed the bolt ins to see how everything fit? It always concerned me as to weather or not the areas of the SFC's that meet the under carriage of the car (where you would bolt them in) will cause scratching+corrosion over time due to the metal vs. metal friction going on there.....
I've been underneath the car several times and haven't seen anything in terms of scratching/corrosion/movement. This is a rain-free car though, so no water has ever been in that area.

As tight as these things are, I'm sure there is no movement.
Old 04-28-2010, 11:40 AM
  #31  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Striker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RPM WS6
I've been underneath the car several times and haven't seen anything in terms of scratching/corrosion/movement. This is a rain-free car though, so no water has ever been in that area.

As tight as these things are, I'm sure there is no movement.
Good to know, thank you. My car doesn't see any foul weather either so I'm guessing its gonna be OK.
Old 04-29-2010, 08:13 AM
  #32  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Pharcyde50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

UMI 3pt weld in here.
Old 04-30-2010, 07:36 PM
  #33  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Mumbles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SouthEastern Iowa
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I have SLP Bolt-On's on my Firebird.

I'm completely satisfied with them, but if I were to do it over again, I'd go with the UMI 3 Point Bolt-On. They're priced less than SLP's and tuck up under the car a little tighter. Looks like they'd be nearly unnoticeable.
Old 04-30-2010, 07:38 PM
  #34  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (17)
 
71-Camaro-98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Weld in = Win
Old 04-30-2010, 07:52 PM
  #35  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
retardedpenguin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pearland, Texas
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I love my welded ones, no squeaks, rattles, flex etc..
Old 01-08-2013, 06:48 AM
  #36  
Staging Lane
 
maromatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Morgantown, WV
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I know im digging up a old thread but no need to start a new one, im thinking about the umi 3pt bolt in. Question is what are the differences between the bolt in weld in? Im thinking about buying the bolt in and running a few small welds on the connectors for added security. Anybody see anything wrong with doing that?
Old 01-08-2013, 08:45 AM
  #37  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,281
Likes: 0
Received 1,713 Likes on 1,228 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by maromatt
Im thinking about buying the bolt in and running a few small welds on the connectors for added security. Anybody see anything wrong with doing that?
Nothing wrong with that at all. Actually, if you want the best possibile bond to the body, welding and bolting would be it.
Old 01-08-2013, 10:03 AM
  #38  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
jbridwelltransam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

FYI MWC is the only TRUE subframe connector. Check them out.
Old 01-16-2013, 02:38 PM
  #39  
Staging Lane
 
Camaraderie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What is the difference between regular sub frame connectors and boxed ones
Old 01-17-2013, 02:53 PM
  #40  
Launching!
 
jsmith564's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: covington ga
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 01'LSwon
Was wondering what brand of subframe connectors was working the best for every one. Weld-in style or bolt-in? Anybody with pics? All feedback is appreciated, thanks.

the best kind are the ones you have ON YOUR CAR...

Had a perfect dash before the big motor, didn't have any SFC and ouch... busted dash. Not even looking for torque dimples...


Quick Reply: Best subframe connectors?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:51 PM.