General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.

Book calls for 91 oct

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-05-2010, 11:08 PM
  #21  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
 
MikeWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

well i got a jeep too so i dont really care
Old 05-06-2010, 12:18 AM
  #22  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Slow94Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rochester, MN
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I don't care if they need it or not, both the LT1 and the L67 get 93 ALWAYS. A little extra octane never hurt anyone.
Old 05-06-2010, 12:20 PM
  #23  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
71novaguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

A little extra octane never hurt anyone.
Fail. Did you not read RPM WS6's post?
Old 05-06-2010, 01:23 PM
  #24  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Wesmanw02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 71novaguy
Incorrect, it calls for 91+ for maximum performance, but can run on 87. I actually ran my best 1/4 mile on 89 when I had my 04 GTP.
Maybe they revised the spec in 2004, but my '97 GTP required 91 octane minimum. It was labeled in the gas filler door as well as in the owners manual:

Straight from the manual:

If you have the 3800 Supercharged engine (VIN Code
l), use premium unleaded gasoline rated at 91 octane or
higher.
Old 05-06-2010, 03:04 PM
  #25  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
71novaguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Maybe they revised the spec in 2004, but my '97 GTP required 91 octane minimum. It was labeled in the gas filler door as well as in the owners manual:

Straight from the manual:

If you have the 3800 Supercharged engine (VIN Code
l), use premium unleaded gasoline rated at 91 octane or
higher.
Yes, they did. They bumped it 20 hp, and allowed it to run on regular fuel, as well as many other additions to the engine
Old 05-06-2010, 03:08 PM
  #26  
Staging Lane
 
Dummybait's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Charlotte, Michigan
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i run 93 in everything i own... pump 93 octane... in most cases... is not even 93.. more like 90-91 so i want as high octane as i can get.. plus... ever look at 87 vs 93 in a clear container? 87 is yellow... and dirty looking, 93 has a blue tint to it. to me 87 is $hit fuel.. i'll run it in my mower but that's about it. at only .20 more a gallon.. i'll take the higher octane especially in the summer months.
Old 05-06-2010, 03:12 PM
  #27  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
71novaguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

^^wow
Old 05-06-2010, 05:47 PM
  #28  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (5)
 
1gt2nv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Wausau, WI
Posts: 969
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 71novaguy
Incorrect, it calls for 91+ for maximum performance, but can run on 87. I actually ran my best 1/4 mile on 89 when I had my 04 GTP.

Back to what RPM WS6 said, yes! You ever get the feeling that people have no sense of direction and follow whatever they hear? Putting 91+ in the 3.8 (n/a) is just about as pointless as the people running sythetic oil and changing it at 3k.
No. My book says to run 91+ only.
Old 05-06-2010, 06:01 PM
  #29  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (33)
 
JonCR96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Asheboro, NC
Posts: 3,005
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Finkledbody
Couldn't agree with you more. I've put 60k miles on this car now and for the first 1 or 2 thousand miles I ran 87. For some reason it ran like **** leaving me to believe it was dynotuned by the previous owner. Could never confirm it though. Switched up to 91 and the car ran smoother, ticked less and started getting better mpgs. Just my experience with this car. Dynod the car a few years ago and put the numbers down I'm showing in my sig which was more than I was expecting for a bolt-on 3.8.
Depending on what you changed on your bolt-on 3.8 it could be throwing off the tune. Modifying your MAF could cause you to run leaner and have higher timing. I don't know what the ideal timing is for that motor, but if it has proper tuning it still may not need 91+.

Getting the best performance is about running the correct fuel, timing and spark plugs (heat range). All three need to be considered before you start really changing things around.
Old 05-06-2010, 06:11 PM
  #30  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
71novaguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

No. My book says to run 91+ only.
Still wrong. See attached. Note where it says you can use middle or regular grade.
Attached Files
Old 05-06-2010, 09:26 PM
  #31  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,299
Likes: 0
Received 1,726 Likes on 1,238 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dummybait
i run 93 in everything i own... pump 93 octane... in most cases... is not even 93.. more like 90-91 so i want as high octane as i can get.. plus... ever look at 87 vs 93 in a clear container? 87 is yellow... and dirty looking, 93 has a blue tint to it. to me 87 is $hit fuel.. i'll run it in my mower but that's about it. at only .20 more a gallon.. i'll take the higher octane especially in the summer months.
Obviously, you are welcome to your opinion, but understand that it's just that.... your opinion, not fact. 87 isn't "**** fuel", nor is 93 going to do anything to help MPG, performance, or engine longevity in an application where 87 is the optimal fuel.

....and I would really like to know where all these people are getting the idea that premium fuel will give them better power/MPG/engine life in an application that calls for regular?

Octane (by itself) does NOT = more power, it just = more resistance to detonation (as has been posted previously). But if you have an engine/tune that doesn't *need* that extra resistance, then all you are doing is hurting power and MPG by slowing the combustion process.

Last edited by RPM WS6; 05-06-2010 at 09:46 PM.
Old 05-06-2010, 10:04 PM
  #32  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
eseibel67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kitchener, ON
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RPM WS6
....and I would really like to know where all these people are getting the idea that premium fuel will give them better power/MPG/engine life in an application that calls for regular?
That's easy - advertising. The ads aren't inaccurate, but they are extremely misleading. The end result is you buy something you don't need.
Old 05-07-2010, 03:49 PM
  #33  
Staging Lane
 
Dummybait's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Charlotte, Michigan
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RPM WS6
Obviously, you are welcome to your opinion, but understand that it's just that.... your opinion, not fact. 87 isn't "**** fuel", nor is 93 going to do anything to help MPG, performance, or engine longevity in an application where 87 is the optimal fuel.

....and I would really like to know where all these people are getting the idea that premium fuel will give them better power/MPG/engine life in an application that calls for regular?

Octane (by itself) does NOT = more power, it just = more resistance to detonation (as has been posted previously). But if you have an engine/tune that doesn't *need* that extra resistance, then all you are doing is hurting power and MPG by slowing the combustion process.
Never said that u make more power or get better mileage... Pump gas is watered down... I know a couple of folks that work for a company who tests pump fuel. In most incidents the fuel is a couple of points less than advertized. I do agree with you though on a higher octane does not necessarally mean u can gain more power. There are a ton of variables... Example. My ion redline actually dynoed higher with 89 octane than 93. But I was getting alot of audable predetination on lower rpms. So I use 93 and I get literally no kr
Old 05-08-2010, 12:36 AM
  #34  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
Arc00TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The 'Nard
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Reading this reminds me of my first job in high school pumping gas, everyone wanted 93 for their 1976 civic or whatever POS they drove, I think probably 6/10 people got "super" regardless of the type of car they drove.
Old 05-08-2010, 01:09 AM
  #35  
Rockstar
iTrader: (15)
 
Johnny-LT1-runner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: I'm on a boat! in Shreveport, La
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'll buy the cheapest gas I can, but not on the white Z, it's tuned for 93, and around here they're putting up to 10% ethanol in the cheap grade fuel. I wouldn't take my chances with that stuff even if I could run it.
Old 05-08-2010, 10:36 AM
  #36  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,299
Likes: 0
Received 1,726 Likes on 1,238 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Johnny-LT1-runner
and around here they're putting up to 10% ethanol in the cheap grade fuel. I wouldn't take my chances with that stuff even if I could run it.
We've had 10% ethanol in all grades/brands of fuel in my area for probably 20 years at least. Doesn't seem to cause any issues at all.
Old 05-08-2010, 12:00 PM
  #37  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (33)
 
JonCR96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Asheboro, NC
Posts: 3,005
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Ethanol is a higher octane that gasoline (though if you're buying 93, then it should still be 93). Ethanol just doesn't put off as much energy when burnt as gas does, so it will make less power unless you build/tune around it.
Old 05-08-2010, 12:32 PM
  #38  
Launching!
iTrader: (13)
 
zaaronz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Longview, TX
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The small town i live in had 3 gas stations still selling gas with NO ethanol till last week, so now i gotta use the ethanol gas like everyone else. But i always put 93 in the trans am. In my 01 silverado with a 6.0 it pings on 87 octane unless it was gas without ethanol so now i may just have to hear the pinging cause it is expensive putting 93 in a truck getting 11 mpg's.
Old 05-08-2010, 04:00 PM
  #39  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
71novaguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'll buy the cheapest gas I can, but not on the white Z, it's tuned for 93, and around here they're putting up to 10% ethanol in the cheap grade fuel. I wouldn't take my chances with that stuff even if I could run it.
You sure its just 87 octane that gets the 10%. I see a lot of places that have 10% in every grade. I actually see 10% in more mid and supreme gasolines.

The small town i live in had 3 gas stations still selling gas with NO ethanol till last week, so now i gotta use the ethanol gas like everyone else. But i always put 93 in the trans am. In my 01 silverado with a 6.0 it pings on 87 octane unless it was gas without ethanol so now i may just have to hear the pinging cause it is expensive putting 93 in a truck getting 11 mpg's.
Old 05-08-2010, 06:08 PM
  #40  
Rockstar
iTrader: (15)
 
Johnny-LT1-runner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: I'm on a boat! in Shreveport, La
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 71novaguy
You sure its just 87 octane that gets the 10%. I see a lot of places that have 10% in every grade. I actually see 10% in more mid and supreme gasolines.
Stations like shell put it in all grades, but others like chevron and truck stops have the stickers on the low grades.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17 PM.