General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.

endangered hobby

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-14-2010 | 01:39 PM
  #21  
FST SS's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 404
Likes: 1
From: Harvester Mo.
Default

Originally Posted by RPM WS6
The real "dark ages" of factory performance were from 1975 to 1984. In 1974 you could still get a SD-455 Firebird, which was really the last excellent performer. Then starting in 1985 performance returned to a mentionable level with the TPI 5.7L Corvette, followed over the next couple years with that same engine moving into the Camaro/Firebird and an intercooled version of the 3.8L V6 hitting the Turbo Buicks. The 5.0 Mustang became respectable again as well. Those cars all performed similar (or in some cases better) than your average run-of-the-mill base big block Muscle cars of the previous era. Not everything was a 454ci or a 440-6. Your typical Mopar 383ci or Chevy 396/325hp would have it's hands full with a stock '87 Grand National.

Point being, factory performance was really only dead for about 9-10 years before finding it's way back.

I don't think a 5.0 mustang would stand up against a 1968 327 Camaro or a 1969 350 Nova or a '70 340 Cuda (I think they made one of those). And how many '87 Turbo Buicks did they make compared to the typical Mopar 383 or Chevy 396/325hp. And an '87 IROC Camaro would not stand up against a '98 Z28.
We do agree though that there was definately a "dark ages" of factory performance and that we have evolved better from it. I did date myself though when I said I bought a new '71 351 Boss Mustang and I can remember going to the Drive In Movie and setting in a row with myself, a '69 Z28, a '70 Cuda, a '67 GTO, a '69 Chevelle SS 396, and a '69 Mach 1 428 CJ. Ahh, those were the days.
Old 10-14-2010 | 02:42 PM
  #22  
RPM WS6's Avatar
LS1Tech Administrator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 32,396
Likes: 1,818
From: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Default

Originally Posted by FST SS
I don't think a 5.0 mustang would stand up against a 1968 327 Camaro or a 1969 350 Nova or a '70 340 Cuda (I think they made one of those). And how many '87 Turbo Buicks did they make compared to the typical Mopar 383 or Chevy 396/325hp. And an '87 IROC Camaro would not stand up against a '98 Z28.
Well, it's hard to compare ETs from then to now, because of tire improvements, but trap speed is still a good measure of how performance compared. A late '80s 5.0 Mustang 5-speed, 5.7L F-body/C4, or '86+ turbo Buick were all able to pull stock trap speeds in the mid to high 90s, especially in their lightest weight versions. At that rate, they would be more than a match for a common stock SBC in any F or X body from the '68-'72 era, and even a strong match for the base 325hp BBC.

As for production numbers, you're right that turbo Buicks weren't nearly as common as a Mopar 383 or Chevy 396, but they weren't exactly rare either. There were over 35,000 intercooled 3.8L turbo Buicks built in '86 & '87, so they were certainly out there for the buying.

I do agree that an '87 Camaro with a TPI 350 would be no match for a '98 Z28, however, that same '87 TPI 350 car would be a solid match for a stock '69 Camaro with a 350.

Originally Posted by FST SS
We do agree though that there was definately a "dark ages" of factory performance and that we have evolved better from it.
We have definitely acheived better performance than the vast majority of cars from the original muscle car era. Just last weekend, I drove my friend's nearly complete project - '74 Cuda with a '69 440ci block built mostly to 1970 6-pack specs. Upgrades from stock '70 specs include a mild cam and LT headers, the engine made 369hp before it went in the car. The car is an impressive performer with gobs of torque, but I think a stock '98 LS1 car would still give it a decent run.

Originally Posted by FST SS
I did date myself though when I said I bought a new '71 351 Boss Mustang and I can remember going to the Drive In Movie and setting in a row with myself, a '69 Z28, a '70 Cuda, a '67 GTO, a '69 Chevelle SS 396, and a '69 Mach 1 428 CJ. Ahh, those were the days.
Nothing wrong with dating yourself to such a cool era! Don't get me wrong, I'm a huge fan of the old muscle, I've owned/still own some of that too, and my modern cars are NO replacement for the cool factor of driving down the road in my old, carbed, iron block, loud & simple muscle car. My 4th gen Camaros are faster than my Nova, but the Nova is sooooo much more fun to drive.

Last edited by RPM WS6; 10-14-2010 at 02:58 PM.
Old 10-14-2010 | 08:04 PM
  #23  
ULTIMATEORANGESS's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,976
Likes: 17
From: eatontown,nj
Default

Originally Posted by RPM WS6
The real "dark ages" of factory performance were from 1975 to 1984. In 1974 you could still get a SD-455 Firebird, which was really the last excellent performer. Then starting in 1985 performance returned to a mentionable level with the TPI 5.7L Corvette, followed over the next couple years with that same engine moving into the Camaro/Firebird and an intercooled version of the 3.8L V6 hitting the Turbo Buicks. The 5.0 Mustang became respectable again as well. Those cars all performed similar (or in some cases better) than your average run-of-the-mill base big block Muscle cars of the previous era. Not everything was a 454ci or a 440-6. Your typical Mopar 383ci or Chevy 396/325hp would have it's hands full with a stock '87 Grand National.

Point being, factory performance was really only dead for about 9-10 years before finding it's way back.
EFI played a big role in bringing performance back.
Old 10-14-2010 | 08:06 PM
  #24  
DCC!!'s Avatar
TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
From: Abilene Texas
Default

ok what? someone try to lay out exactly who is tryin to kill hotroding and how they are going to?
Old 10-14-2010 | 08:29 PM
  #25  
Black FormulaLs1's Avatar
12 Second Club

iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,089
Likes: 1
From: cape vincent NY
Default

i am going to continue to mod what the hell ever i own at the time.. hell w/ the rules and regulations.. they have just underestimated our sneakiness...
Old 10-17-2010 | 02:43 AM
  #26  
02 BLK WS6's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,689
Likes: 1
From: Glen Carbon, IL
Default

Originally Posted by RPM WS6
We've had laws like this in IL for a long time. Any modification to the exhaust that increases it's volume is illegal. It's never stopped us though, nor is it an enforcement priority in most towns. Sometimes people get tickets for this, but it's rare unless you really **** off some cop.

Yeah, it sucks to even have that stuff on the books, but it certainly won't be the end of the hobby, nor is it anything new.
There must be some gearheads in my local law enforcement. My neighbors have tried to get our HOA to do something about the exhaust on my Camaro. The HOA referred it to our local law enforcement and our HOA was told that our PD would do nothing about it. Our HOA told the complaintants that if I was observed speeding that they could call the Police. I laughed when I read the news letter. 20 mph is pushing it the way I drive. I have 3 kids and would be pissed if someone was hauling ***, so I drive very cautiously.
Old 10-17-2010 | 10:01 AM
  #27  
ILLWS6's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RPM WS6
The real "dark ages" of factory performance were from 1975 to 1984. In 1974 you could still get a SD-455 Firebird, which was really the last excellent performer.
Yup, and Pontiac kept the big block in the Trans Ams unil 1979. I think that makes it "last man standing"!




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:52 PM.