General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.

chevy high performance/ rear end

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-04-2011, 02:19 PM
  #21  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
allbaugh_04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 1,546
Received 19 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Like stated over and over again, not so much with 6 speeds, but they last behind the automatic.

At least mine has. 100k plus, with close to 400rwhp the last few years.
Old 09-05-2011, 03:05 PM
  #22  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
m1a2d3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: trumbull connecticut
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

also the higher the ratio the better chance of it exploding. ive got 425rwhp and 3.23s and its fine so far. but i really want some 4.10s.
Old 09-08-2011, 12:28 PM
  #23  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
pewter2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

RPM, why do you prefer the Auburn type? I replaced my '83 rear (after it grenaded, from abuse) with an Auburn + new 3.73s. I sold that car and have the '02 with Torsen. I wonder if you prefer the Auburn for the same reason(s) I do...
Old 09-08-2011, 03:29 PM
  #24  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,254
Likes: 0
Received 1,687 Likes on 1,208 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by pewter2002
RPM, why do you prefer the Auburn type? I replaced my '83 rear (after it grenaded, from abuse) with an Auburn + new 3.73s. I sold that car and have the '02 with Torsen. I wonder if you prefer the Auburn for the same reason(s) I do...
My primary reason is the chatter - Torsens have it, Auburns don't (in my experience). Also, I have a slight preference for the behavior and feel of the Auburn.

Overall, I guess the Torsen should last longer in theory (mileage wise), and you don't have to worry about LSD additives (even though it's still recommended - though I don't know why), but I still like the feel and chatterless operation of the Auburn better.
Old 09-08-2011, 06:38 PM
  #25  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
pewter2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thanks for the insight. I don't have any chatter with mine (yet?) it seems just as quiet. My issue is the way the Torsen posi "locks" when needed/required. I like the feel of the Auburn with the wheels having some preload to them and not having the feeling of open diff-locked-oversteer/loose feeling if you really load up with throttle when exiting a corner with the Torsen. The breakaway of the rear is more progressive and predictable with an Auburn and therefore the Auburn is smoother and easier to drive on a road course fast. It doesn't give you the Jekyl/Hyde treatment. There is the wear factor though to consider...
Old 09-08-2011, 07:09 PM
  #26  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (4)
 
FirstYrLS1Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Euclid,Ohio
Posts: 4,166
Received 134 Likes on 118 Posts

Default

Being that I work on our little 10 bolts,I watch the 'rearend forum'.
Since Auburns were supplied up to/including the 98 models(now 13 years since last supplied),typical failures were the 'spider gears'.
Torsens were 1999 + later,and failures are the internal gearset and the 4 bolts that hold that internal gearset in the carrier case are loosening/backing out and breaking when they hit something in the housing. Also that flange end (the part held in by those 4 bolts) is failing/cracking.
I prefer the Auburn and Eaton 'clutch-plate' posi. Been using them since the mid 60s'. Also,in the 45 years,never used a 'friction modifier additive' and never had a problem with 'chattering'



Quick Reply: chevy high performance/ rear end



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:52 AM.