General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.

Did FORD design the LS engine?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-28-2012, 07:19 PM
  #21  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
baalic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Amarillo
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Silver Sleeper
an LS1 based ford motor would have been a hell of alot better than that boat anchor 2v 4.6


I concur.
baalic is offline  
Old 07-28-2012, 11:42 PM
  #22  
TECH Regular
 
why87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Piqua,OH
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So has anybody seen ls1 heads on a sbf?
why87 is offline  
Old 07-28-2012, 11:52 PM
  #23  
Pontiacerator
iTrader: (12)
 
RevGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wichita KS / Rancho San Diego
Posts: 6,155
Received 207 Likes on 174 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Silver Sleeper
an LS1 based ford motor would have been a hell of alot better than that boat anchor 2v 4.6
True enough back in the day, but now we're contending with the vicious Coyote 5.0 ...

That being said, as an example of contemporary Ford engineering, the spark plugs tend to break off in the heads of the 5.4 (or whatever is in the trucks) when removal is attempted. The broken plugs can't be removed without taking off the heads. The heads can't come off without the BODY BEING TAKEN OFF THE FRAME. I had heard about this before, but saw it with my own eyes a couple of weeks ago at my buddy's shop. Some poor slob had his truck sitting there, body lifted off the frame, heads off the block, probably spending a couple of thousand bucks, JUST TO CHANGE THE SPARK PLUGS.

Something that just plain could never happen on GM trucks with LS based motors.
RevGTO is offline  
Old 07-29-2012, 12:50 AM
  #24  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (16)
 
cmac06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Alabaster, AL
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Silver Sleeper
an LS1 based ford motor would have been a hell of alot better than that boat anchor 2v 4.6
The one that converts to diesel after 20k miles... That is one fine piece of Ford engineering.
cmac06 is offline  
Old 07-29-2012, 06:34 AM
  #25  
Launching!
iTrader: (7)
 
Silver Sleeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Goldsboro/Pikeville NC
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

no doubt the new 5.0 is a great motor....but its about time for us ford guys...i owned a 99 GT 35th anniversary with a built 4.6...it ran high 7's on motor in the 8th mile but it was an absolute nightmare to work on....to be honest, for the amount of work that was done to the car, it should have been alot faster

Originally Posted by RevGTO
True enough back in the day, but now we're contending with the vicious Coyote 5.0 ...

That being said, as an example of contemporary Ford engineering, the spark plugs tend to break off in the heads of the 5.4 (or whatever is in the trucks) when removal is attempted. The broken plugs can't be removed without taking off the heads. The heads can't come off without the BODY BEING TAKEN OFF THE FRAME. I had heard about this before, but saw it with my own eyes a couple of weeks ago at my buddy's shop. Some poor slob had his truck sitting there, body lifted off the frame, heads off the block, probably spending a couple of thousand bucks, JUST TO CHANGE THE SPARK PLUGS.

Something that just plain could never happen on GM trucks with LS based motors.
Silver Sleeper is offline  
Old 07-29-2012, 02:56 PM
  #26  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
dhouston02's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Catawba, NC
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Name:  ls1ford.jpg
Views: 21636
Size:  15.1 KB

Here is the picture he sent me of what he did. It actually didnt bolt right up but here is what he said "Ls1 head resting on 302 block screw drivers indicating head bolt locations, push rods thru heads and nearly resting on lifters"

"some ppl can't see the obvious resemblance they might not have copied Ford but its to much of a coincidence with the geometry and bolt locations"
dhouston02 is offline  
Old 07-29-2012, 03:02 PM
  #27  
TECH Fanatic
 
JUSTINSWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thatd be the besting thing fords ever done
JUSTINSWS6 is offline  
Old 07-29-2012, 03:43 PM
  #28  
TECH Apprentice
 
608kZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: the race track
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by dhouston02


Here is the picture he sent me of what he did. It actually didnt bolt right up but here is what he said "Ls1 head resting on 302 block screw drivers indicating head bolt locations, push rods thru heads and nearly resting on lifters"

"some ppl can't see the obvious resemblance they might not have copied Ford but its to much of a coincidence with the geometry and bolt locations"
whoopie freaking do!

it either bolts up or it doesnt
608kZ28 is offline  
Old 07-29-2012, 08:17 PM
  #29  
TECH Regular
 
why87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Piqua,OH
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yep, the exhaust ports look about the same. Therefore LS1=Ford designed
why87 is offline  
Old 07-29-2012, 11:55 PM
  #30  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
1BadBlkB1tch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Davenport,fl
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

news to me sweet baby jesus
1BadBlkB1tch is offline  
Old 07-30-2012, 09:23 AM
  #31  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
NC98Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I always though that the chambers on the LS1 heads were copied off the Ferrari Fireball chambers?
NC98Z is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 07:18 AM
  #32  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Kurt D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Pineville, La
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by dhouston02
http://i1183.photobucket.com/albums/...02/ls1ford.jpg

Here is the picture he sent me of what he did. It actually didnt bolt right up but here is what he said "Ls1 head resting on 302 block screw drivers indicating head bolt locations, push rods thru heads and nearly resting on lifters"

"some ppl can't see the obvious resemblance they might not have copied Ford but its to much of a coincidence with the geometry and bolt locations"
Ok, so it doesn't bolt up, a few bolt holes line up, pushrods don't allign, chambers don't align so it must be the same, LOL.

Seriously, there are only so many ways to make a pushrod V8. If they look similar, well that's the nature of the beast. It would be like someone saying Ford did a horrible job coying the LT5 or Northstar with their 4v 4.6 V8 simply because they are OHC.
Kurt D is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 07:49 AM
  #33  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
LS666BEAST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Uuummm No

Noting of the LS motor is ford, they would like to claim it is just like we GM owners can claim there 289 motor is really a blue print motor they got from GM but the truth is most of the tech that is in the LS motor we will have to thank SAAB for, but since GM own SAAB at that time that means all new tech of the LS motors before the aftermarket companies got their hands on it is GM's all the way..... that's right SAAB Thank you
LS666BEAST is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 06:24 PM
  #34  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Fbodyjunkie06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Don't listen to Ford guys....like heater

Sup Heater! I know you're reading this!
Fbodyjunkie06 is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 07:31 PM
  #35  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (36)
 
mjs1012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Stratford, CT
Posts: 2,688
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

the ford boys are just mad cuz they needed a supercharged motor to beat the ls1.
mjs1012 is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 07:43 PM
  #36  
11 Second Club
 
thepitstop2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dayton,Ohio
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE Ford only wishes they were smart enough to use one camshaft.[/QUOTE]

And not multiple timing chains with not timing marks
thepitstop2010 is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 08:32 PM
  #37  
Launching!
iTrader: (7)
 
Silver Sleeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Goldsboro/Pikeville NC
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

up until a few weeks ago i would have argued as well...LOL....but ive come to realize that stock ford pushrod SBF blocks are junk.....for the price of a bare SBF dart block i could build an entire LS based motor and make just as much if not more power......not brand loyalty...its just common sense

Originally Posted by Fbodyjunkie06
Don't listen to Ford guys....like heater

Sup Heater! I know you're reading this!
Silver Sleeper is offline  
Old 08-01-2012, 08:34 PM
  #38  
Launching!
iTrader: (7)
 
Silver Sleeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Goldsboro/Pikeville NC
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i used to make a killing doing cam and head swaps on Mod motors becuase nobody wanted to do them theirselves....i hated doing them but it waseasy money at 500 bux a pop......the timing chain setup is total garbage and each one i worked on had something different between the romeo and windsor setups.......

Originally Posted by thepitstop2010
[QUOTE Ford only wishes they were smart enough to use one camshaft.
And not multiple timing chains with not timing marks[/QUOTE]
Silver Sleeper is offline  
Old 08-05-2012, 06:22 PM
  #39  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
flintwrench69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mt Morris, Michigan
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Silver Sleeper
up until a few weeks ago i would have argued as well...LOL....but ive come to realize that stock ford pushrod SBF blocks are junk.....for the price of a bare SBF dart block i could build an entire LS based motor and make just as much if not more power......not brand loyalty...its just common sense
This is why most of the mustang guys that make drag cars are LSX or SBC powered
flintwrench69 is offline  
Old 08-06-2012, 06:58 PM
  #40  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
murphinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: southern Maine
Posts: 1,650
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Fucken Old Rotten Dodge

thats all I gotto contribute other than I like the little lsx engine over the wide as in fill your whole engine bay and then some mod motor.

Oh and dont forget the GM v6 engineered about the same time as the LSX , series 2 3800 - quickest one of them with stock block and rotating assembly has been 8.6 @159 in a street registerred FWD car (ZZPerformance) before I got into LSX cars I was into 3800 SC cars ( still have a couple) and it was always fun picking on the v8 mustangs with my stock internals 4 door fwd little 6 banger

GM FTW mid 90's to late 2000's now ford is making some nasty engines and the mustangs are lighter than the camaros so its a real rivalry again at this point - Ford hasnt been on top of Chevy in the street wars since the original 5.0's 20 years ago and anyone with a couple tweaks on a t type or GN owned them lol so still GM FTW
murphinator is offline  


Quick Reply: Did FORD design the LS engine?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:18 PM.