General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.
View Poll Results: Are heads/cam considered a bolt on?
Yes!
3
6.98%
No!
40
93.02%
Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll

Is cam/heads considered a bolt-on?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-23-2013, 03:42 PM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
NoHope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Mishawaka, IN
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Is cam/heads considered a bolt-on?

I've seen a lot of debate over this, with good points on both sides. I am still on the side that anything engine internal is no longer a bolt on, but some people are not.

So to you, are a cam or heads considered a bolt on?
Old 03-23-2013, 03:48 PM
  #2  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
flattusmaximus78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Bolt on is a none internal engine mod. Bolt on doesn't not include nitrous, or forced induction.

Intake, tune, exhaust.... etc.
Old 03-23-2013, 03:48 PM
  #3  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
badformulaLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've never heard of anyone calling them bolt ons
Old 03-23-2013, 03:58 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
TheBlueKnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,971
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I've seen these threads come and go over the years. A bunch of people will say they are technically bolt ons while the majority will say they are not. It's all a personal preference.

Is a cam bolt on? My opinion is it's not. You have to take apart the front of the engine and slide it in, it's part of the internals. Are heads a bolt on? Kind of a grey area for most. It's one of those things where it's technically a bolt on, but most people don't see it as such as the heads contain the valve train which mechanically interacts with the cam and internal components.
Old 03-23-2013, 04:01 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (88)
 
Burken01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Anaheim, Ca
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by flattusmaximus78
Bolt on is a none internal engine mod. Bolt on doesn't not include nitrous, or forced induction.

Intake, tune, exhaust.... etc.

we all have are own definitions but this is the standard definition used..

as long as the longblock is untouched then its considered a bolt on..

But everything is technically a bolt on

I guess the term "bolt on" is more for conversation when explaining non-involved quick mods done to your car.
Old 03-23-2013, 04:19 PM
  #6  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,324
Likes: 0
Received 1,760 Likes on 1,257 Posts

Default

I don't know of any debate over this nor any good arguements that would point to them being bolt-ons. If anyone actually believes that modified/upgraded cylinder heads are a bolt-on simply because they "bolt on", then you might as well call an upgraded engine block a bolt-on as well, because it too simply "bolts on" to other items.
Old 03-23-2013, 05:00 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Technically no, but who really gives a damn...power is power lol
Old 03-23-2013, 05:39 PM
  #8  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,358
Received 26 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

Not even close.

Nitrous or a blower are also not bolt ons...
Old 03-23-2013, 05:43 PM
  #9  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (41)
 
senicalj4579's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,257
Received 22 Likes on 20 Posts

Default

Theres so many ways anyone can spin this but in a nut shell I say no, they are not bolt ons.
Old 03-23-2013, 06:03 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
RADEoN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Harrison City, PA
Posts: 1,697
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

turbos and superchargers bolt on... stroker shortblocks bolt on... so anything you do to a car is considered a bolt on if someone is a retard.

I HATE IT when people say "full bolt on"
Old 03-23-2013, 06:45 PM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ULTIMATEORANGESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: eatontown,nj
Posts: 10,976
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Smile

no, but dont let that stop you from BOLTING them in.
Old 03-23-2013, 07:49 PM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Blackpanther99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Baytown, TX
Posts: 6,963
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I personally dont think a cam or heads would be considered as bolts on mod. Even though the heads are external part of a engine it could be considered a bolt on, but to me its not a FBO mod. Its a good question though. People claim they have just full bolts on when they have a bigger cam and ported aftermarket heads. Lol
Old 03-23-2013, 08:34 PM
  #13  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
1320Chicken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

To me if you have to replace a gasket that touches the block its not a bolt on. Only exception I'd make is an e water pump.
Old 03-23-2013, 09:44 PM
  #14  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
high impact's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Interesting...I have never seen a debate over heads/cam considered as a "bolt on". Although I have wondered about an intake being considered a "bolt on"...an intake should not be considered a "bolt on.
Old 03-23-2013, 10:08 PM
  #15  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
redtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Belmont, MA
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Interesting...I have never seen a debate over heads/cam considered as a "bolt on".
+1...I've never encountered anyone that would say heads/cam are "bolt-on modifications" even though they technically do bolt on.

For most gearheads (not ricers) a bolt-on is something outside of the longblock and does not include any form of "forced" induction (nitrous, blower, turbo).
Old 03-23-2013, 10:38 PM
  #16  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (3)
 
WS.SIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Maricopa, AZ
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

My personal definition of a bolton is anything that doesn't touch engine fluids. Minus superchargers and turbochargers. In my eyes (dry) nitrous is a bolton. A wet kit is not because it interfaces with the vehicles fuel system.

So by that definition, cam/heads is not considered a bolt on as they both touch oil.
Old 03-24-2013, 06:36 AM
  #17  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (6)
 
MonmouthCtyLS7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rotonda West Florida
Posts: 3,955
Received 30 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

No debate, H/C isn't a bolt on.
Old 03-24-2013, 06:44 AM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
 
justin hover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well at any point you unscrew, add a new screw or screw an existing bolt...to an internal cam install, well then it's surly a bolt-on..haha
Whos the jerk who voted yes???

Last edited by justin hover; 03-24-2013 at 06:49 AM.
Old 03-25-2013, 02:49 AM
  #19  
TECH Regular
 
94 White T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Wildomar, CA
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I've been taught that anything that touches oil is no longer a bolt on
Old 03-25-2013, 03:54 AM
  #20  
Staging Lane
 
gtfodave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Fort Myers, Florida
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ive always heard it like this I/H/E intake as in cold or ram air/ headers/Exhaust
and H/C/I heads cam Intake



Quick Reply: Is cam/heads considered a bolt-on?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:13 PM.