General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.

JE Piston article on 3.900 stroke cranks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-16-2018, 07:17 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Mobileaudio25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default JE Piston article on 3.900 stroke cranks

I stumbled across this article on google and I was wondering if anyone has done any measuring or can validate this info on 3.900 crankshafts in ls blocks.

I’ve read/heard before that 4.000 stroke causes the piston rings and the piston skirt to swipe the bottom of the cylinder which causes premature wear/failure. This article is saying that with a 3.900 crank (which is kind of an odd stroke) you don’t get that rub on the bottom of the cylinder.
I asked two Representatives about this info on the phone but they both said they haven’t heard this before. I’m curious if a 3.900 crank is more safe because I’m building an LQ9 turbo motor and replacing the crank so if I can safely stroke it while I have it torn apart I would like to.

http://blog.jepistons.com/different-...nk-for-your-ls
Old 03-19-2018, 09:07 AM
  #2  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 314 Likes on 212 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mobileaudio25
I stumbled across this article on google and I was wondering if anyone has done any measuring or can validate this info on 3.900 crankshafts in ls blocks.

I’ve read/heard before that 4.000 stroke causes the piston rings and the piston skirt to swipe the bottom of the cylinder which causes premature wear/failure. This article is saying that with a 3.900 crank (which is kind of an odd stroke) you don’t get that rub on the bottom of the cylinder.
I asked two Representatives about this info on the phone but they both said they haven’t heard this before. I’m curious if a 3.900 crank is more safe because I’m building an LQ9 turbo motor and replacing the crank so if I can safely stroke it while I have it torn apart I would like to.

http://blog.jepistons.com/different-...nk-for-your-ls
Like the article says:

“One thing to note, is that the 4.000-inch stroke is the most popular out of all stroker LS combinations. So even with the added wear, most builders and racers are willing to accept this.”

While the article isn't exactly untrue, it does leave a lot of other variables out. Some of the latest piston technology and designs make the difference negligible.
Old 03-20-2018, 10:22 AM
  #3  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
 
pantera_efi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Santa Ana, CA. USA
Posts: 2,157
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts

Default Piston Skirt Length

Hi ALL, I agree with KCS AND the SIMPLE FACT of the difference in a Piston Skirt Requirement Length OF >.050" shorter OR that of a Spark Plug Gap WHEN a 4.00" Crankshaft is compared to a 3.90" crankshaft piston.

The setup is simple, install ONE rod/piston without rings and observe the bottom of the cylinder for piston position.
Machine the piston skirt, if necessary, to keep the piston inside the cylinder.

I fit Racetech Pistons.

Lance




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57 PM.