Older 5.7 or newer 5.3
#22
Sort of a segway.
If you buy and engine/trans combo without a ECM/harness ...... how do you deal with VIN.
Going into a 57 --- so dont think the VIN thing is relevant ..... but if you buy a ECM online like ebay ...... just leave the VIN as anyting ?
eg
https://www.ebay.com/itm/08-SILVERAD...5Yt2Ju&vxp=mtr
and this the same for all year trucks (3/4/5th gen) ? etc
If you buy and engine/trans combo without a ECM/harness ...... how do you deal with VIN.
Going into a 57 --- so dont think the VIN thing is relevant ..... but if you buy a ECM online like ebay ...... just leave the VIN as anyting ?
eg
https://www.ebay.com/itm/08-SILVERAD...5Yt2Ju&vxp=mtr
and this the same for all year trucks (3/4/5th gen) ? etc
#24
A little higher than other places I have seen online like ebay/CL
But .... feel better about seeing it in person and doing a leakdown test before handing over $3k+
And oil/other checks etc
Ebay makes me nervous in terms of getting something returned if there was an issue
But .... feel better about seeing it in person and doing a leakdown test before handing over $3k+
And oil/other checks etc
Ebay makes me nervous in terms of getting something returned if there was an issue
#25
FormerVendor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Santa Ana, CA. USA
Posts: 2,157
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes
on
17 Posts
Early/Late LS1 engine strength
Hi TBerg, thanks as you are the ONLY one who responded to the FACT that their is MORE than one LS-1 engine specification, early/late.
I have assembled "late" LS-1 crankcase engines with NO strength problems caused by what I stated.
My "tech" was as yours, find a 2000+ LS-1 engine (stronger) AND they will be close in price. (early/late)
My report DID NOT support a GDI engine choice.
My method is to buy a Escalade Truck 2007+ with the L-92. (6.2L)
This has been done by "bidding" on a Total Crash Parts CAR (no title/rollover) with a winning bid of $2550.00.
Lance
I have assembled "late" LS-1 crankcase engines with NO strength problems caused by what I stated.
My "tech" was as yours, find a 2000+ LS-1 engine (stronger) AND they will be close in price. (early/late)
My report DID NOT support a GDI engine choice.
My method is to buy a Escalade Truck 2007+ with the L-92. (6.2L)
This has been done by "bidding" on a Total Crash Parts CAR (no title/rollover) with a winning bid of $2550.00.
Lance
#26
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 0
Received 81 Likes
on
72 Posts
I would do whatever is easiest to package and tune. Most like stay gen3 or 4, then choose aluminum vs cast iron on weight and $$ in the budget. The newer stuff has more crap to delete, trickier to tune, etc etc. Internals arent important at 500hp, they all can do that without issue.
#27
Thanks for info guys.
Last one I can think of
The accessories in the LS1 style versus truck style.
How much can be reused (typically).
Meaning if you can use the oil pan from the LS1 generally - then that also saves you $200 from biuying one on a 5.3 truck for example to fix clearance.
How about the accessories and position etc. Going in an older vehicle.
Last one I can think of
The accessories in the LS1 style versus truck style.
How much can be reused (typically).
Meaning if you can use the oil pan from the LS1 generally - then that also saves you $200 from biuying one on a 5.3 truck for example to fix clearance.
How about the accessories and position etc. Going in an older vehicle.
#28
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 0
Received 81 Likes
on
72 Posts
Truck accs sit a little higher. Car stuff is packaged a little lower/closer. Truck stuff is generally much cheaper bc its more readily available. Oil pans depend on frame clearance, truck pans hang quite a bit lower then car pans.
#29
TECH Resident
Since you're swapping into an old truck you should probably start with the truck accessories. The car set up puts things down low and can cause some fit issues with the steering and frame rail. If you can find a company that makes a kit with mounts and oil pan they'll note the accessories that fit with the position that their kit puts the engine in.
It might be worth picking up a blown truck motor for a hundred bucks to use for test fitting and mock up. If everything goes together well all you need to replace is the long block since you already have all the accessories and brackets.
It might be worth picking up a blown truck motor for a hundred bucks to use for test fitting and mock up. If everything goes together well all you need to replace is the long block since you already have all the accessories and brackets.
#32
TECH Resident
#33
Banned
iTrader: (1)
The oldest engine I would even think of using is 2002. Soon I will say 2004. The number doesn't go down, it goes up.
In 98-00 Chevrolet made some significant leaps and bounds, but it was like the earliest ("darkest" if you will) ages of the newest tech that is to come.
IMO right now 2004~ Gen 4 rod 5.3 type engine is all the hype/rage. Everyone talking about the L33 and how boost friendly it is.
In 98-00 Chevrolet made some significant leaps and bounds, but it was like the earliest ("darkest" if you will) ages of the newest tech that is to come.
IMO right now 2004~ Gen 4 rod 5.3 type engine is all the hype/rage. Everyone talking about the L33 and how boost friendly it is.
#34
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 0
Received 81 Likes
on
72 Posts
The oldest engine I would even think of using is 2002. Soon I will say 2004. The number doesn't go down, it goes up.
In 98-00 Chevrolet made some significant leaps and bounds, but it was like the earliest ("darkest" if you will) ages of the newest tech that is to come.
IMO right now 2004~ Gen 4 rod 5.3 type engine is all the hype/rage. Everyone talking about the L33 and how boost friendly it is.
In 98-00 Chevrolet made some significant leaps and bounds, but it was like the earliest ("darkest" if you will) ages of the newest tech that is to come.
IMO right now 2004~ Gen 4 rod 5.3 type engine is all the hype/rage. Everyone talking about the L33 and how boost friendly it is.
#35
Since you're swapping into an old truck you should probably start with the truck accessories. The car set up puts things down low and can cause some fit issues with the steering and frame rail. If you can find a company that makes a kit with mounts and oil pan they'll note the accessories that fit with the position that their kit puts the engine in.
It might be worth picking up a blown truck motor for a hundred bucks to use for test fitting and mock up. If everything goes together well all you need to replace is the long block since you already have all the accessories and brackets.
It might be worth picking up a blown truck motor for a hundred bucks to use for test fitting and mock up. If everything goes together well all you need to replace is the long block since you already have all the accessories and brackets.
I can get a core block easy enough ...... its the trans side mainly concerned with. Might help with oil pan though.
Yeah - I know there are more things like DOD/VVT but seems lots of aftermarket options now - right ?
I tend to lean towards newer engines.
IF I could fine one in FL that wasnt crazy priced Found 2 new rebuilds .... but never heard backl from the sellers. Rest are all over 140k ... which I know is fine but prefer sub 100k.
That said, I think year 2000 is too old. How about you find something newer but not so new?
IF I could fine one in FL that wasnt crazy priced Found 2 new rebuilds .... but never heard backl from the sellers. Rest are all over 140k ... which I know is fine but prefer sub 100k.
That said, I think year 2000 is too old. How about you find something newer but not so new?
The oldest engine I would even think of using is 2002. Soon I will say 2004. The number doesn't go down, it goes up.
In 98-00 Chevrolet made some significant leaps and bounds, but it was like the earliest ("darkest" if you will) ages of the newest tech that is to come.
IMO right now 2004~ Gen 4 rod 5.3 type engine is all the hype/rage. Everyone talking about the L33 and how boost friendly it is.
In 98-00 Chevrolet made some significant leaps and bounds, but it was like the earliest ("darkest" if you will) ages of the newest tech that is to come.
IMO right now 2004~ Gen 4 rod 5.3 type engine is all the hype/rage. Everyone talking about the L33 and how boost friendly it is.
You literally NEVER seem to look at the big picture. By lack of knowledge or hard-headedness. The l33 is popular for a ton of reasons. Its aluminum, and its a gen3/4 hybrid. Meaning it has better gen4 internals, but an old style gen3 computer (which i prefer) can run it due to a 24 tooth crank. 3 bolt cams are more popular on the used market, it comes with the better 799 heads etc etc. Its a gem for boosted applications, and holds the fastest stock bottom end record. I should know, I have one in my car. For transplants, I prefer drive by cable (i have both). I dont trust the drive by wire IF i have a choice. Drive by cable means older computer, and if you want a direct swap you need to be around 06 and older depending on exact engine choice. Like i said, I would try to match the setup, an fbody for instance, has an older computer, setup for DBC, rear cam sensor, can control a 4L80e with a segment swap, is super easy to tune, can have a custom OS 3bar flashed in for free....An 05-07 gen3/4 is perfect for it (cast or aluminum), especially for boost. If you want DBW, go ahead and step up to a newer gen4 engine, do a matching newer computer/harness, get ready to delete the variable cam crap, and maybe look for a single bolt cam etc etc. Again, there is no perfect engine, match the setup.
But good points ....... IM torn on the DBC/DBW stuff but have no experience so interesting to hear.
thx guys
#36
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 0
Received 81 Likes
on
72 Posts
Again, if you select a PCM first, you may be stuck with cable or wire. If DBW, you CANNOT backwards convert to a gen3 engine (24 crank) or cable throttle after the fact. Thats the whole point, dont buy anything until you know what you are locking yourself into.
#37
Banned
iTrader: (1)
You literally NEVER seem to look at the big picture. By lack of knowledge or hard-headedness. The l33 is popular for a ton of reasons. Its aluminum, and its a gen3/4 hybrid. Meaning it has better gen4 internals, but an old style gen3 computer (which i prefer) can run it due to a 24 tooth crank. 3 bolt cams are more popular on the used market, it comes with the better 799 heads etc etc. Its a gem for boosted applications, and holds the fastest stock bottom end record. I should know, I have one in my car. For transplants, I prefer drive by cable (i have both). I dont trust the drive by wire IF i have a choice. Drive by cable means older computer, and if you want a direct swap you need to be around 06 and older depending on exact engine choice. Like i said, I would try to match the setup, an fbody for instance, has an older computer, setup for DBC, rear cam sensor, can control a 4L80e with a segment swap, is super easy to tune, can have a custom OS 3bar flashed in for free....An 05-07 gen3/4 is perfect for it (cast or aluminum), especially for boost. If you want DBW, go ahead and step up to a newer gen4 engine, do a matching newer computer/harness, get ready to delete the variable cam crap, and maybe look for a single bolt cam etc etc. Again, there is no perfect engine, match the setup.
#38
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 0
Received 81 Likes
on
72 Posts
Again, you miss the point completely. You said use an l33 cause the internet said so. I said people use it for xx reasons. I used it bc it fit my application perfectly. That wont apply to everyone, and i didnt imply that it would.
#39
TECH Resident
Since all the gen 3/4/5 mount the same you can use any core for mockup. The trans position will be based on how far back the motor mounts position the block. If you clearance the firewall and floorplan for a 4l80 or even a newer 6l80 you'll have plenty of room for anything else you would want since the other common options are smaller. If you mockup a 700r4 and decide later to go with a 4l80 you'll have to make more room. It really comes down to how much leg room you're willing to sacrifice in exchange for trans strength. The quick and easy way is to get a donor and use the engine, trans and wiring as a complete package. That most likely means a 4l60/70 or 4l80 depending on the donor.
#40
TECH Fanatic