Car Domain - Full of clueless people?
#1
Car Domain - Full of clueless people?
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2441201
Some kid with a V6 posts on my guestbook saying that Camaros only have 310hp and everything I put is bullshit. So I replied back with the facts... few examples (MM&FF articles) ... he still thinks my car runs 13.9 in the 1/4 and I am making stuff up. LMAO...
Thought you guys might get a laugh... anyone else deal with someone who just won't listen to the truth?
Some kid with a V6 posts on my guestbook saying that Camaros only have 310hp and everything I put is bullshit. So I replied back with the facts... few examples (MM&FF articles) ... he still thinks my car runs 13.9 in the 1/4 and I am making stuff up. LMAO...
Thought you guys might get a laugh... anyone else deal with someone who just won't listen to the truth?
#2
def. are alot of idiots but thats a 228 not a v6, and cardomain is definity gay, people put cars on their that arnt even thiers, just find pics online and say "ohhhhhhhhh this is my new car" which is why I dont go to that site
#5
he owns a lt1 though too, so you'd think he would have some common since(Like the lt1 makes the same power as the vettes lt1..or damn close to it). I love people that magazine race. there is one thing..like using facts from a magazien like saying. well this guy ran a 13.9 at one point.... So in theory..you should be able to run a 13.9 too, but its not an absolute. ****, my first run was a 14.2 at 101 because i let off because it was my first time going down the track and i let off at the first beam cause I thought that was the end. second run was a 14.0 at 104 with a 2.6 60ft..does that make ls1s a 14 second car..lol. No, just some shitty drivers own them...lol. Now, I'm down to a 13.5 at 108 with jsut a catback in similar weather to you, but with a 2.4 60ft. This kid probably has never been to the track before adn assumes that all times in magazines are absolute because those guys drive cars everyday.
#6
find the article in CHP on where they compare the 2000 Vette to the 2000 Camaro and they both lay down the same dyno numbers (+/-) corrected for drivetrain loss and atmospheric conditions. he cant argue with facts remember?
Trending Topics
#8
Some folks just need a good bitch-slappin'. The trouble is they can throw their little taunts at you in between lookin' at Internet **** in their bedroom at mommy and daddy's house and don't have to back it up with anything from the real world.
Rock on.
Rock on.
#9
You also said your bone stock M6 has 375 hp and that the 0-60 is only 4.6 seconds. I guess the 0-60 is possible on really good tires and a sticky track, but I'm pretty sure the LS1 puts out ~350 hp.
#10
Originally Posted by bww3588
find the article in CHP on where they compare the 2000 Vette to the 2000 Camaro and they both lay down the same dyno numbers (+/-) corrected for drivetrain loss and atmospheric conditions. he cant argue with facts remember?
#12
According to the 2camaro guy I only have a 5 horse power loss through the drivetrain because when I was completely stock I put down 305rwhp and 310tq. It would be nice to have a drivetrain that was 98.4% efficient!
#15
Originally Posted by giant016
You also said your bone stock M6 has 375 hp and that the 0-60 is only 4.6 seconds. I guess the 0-60 is possible on really good tires and a sticky track, but I'm pretty sure the LS1 puts out ~350 hp.
Taking 15% DT loss from 375hp gets you 318.75rwhp... which if I am not mistaken the 01 ~ 02 cars come close to putting down right? At this point it was merely a guestimate ...
15% of 350hp would be just under 300rwhp... which according to my curb weight would mean I shouldn't be trapping as high.
15% of 360hp would be ~306rwhp...
I believe 15% was the right DT loss..but I may be mistaken.
#16
Originally Posted by S8ER95Z
That was actually based on online calculators off 1/4 mile based on weight.
Taking 15% DT loss from 375hp gets you 318.75rwhp... which if I am not mistaken the 01 ~ 02 cars come close to putting down right? At this point it was merely a guestimate ...
15% of 350hp would be just under 300rwhp... which according to my curb weight would mean I shouldn't be trapping as high.
15% of 360hp would be ~306rwhp...
I believe 15% was the right DT loss..but I may be mistaken.
Taking 15% DT loss from 375hp gets you 318.75rwhp... which if I am not mistaken the 01 ~ 02 cars come close to putting down right? At this point it was merely a guestimate ...
15% of 350hp would be just under 300rwhp... which according to my curb weight would mean I shouldn't be trapping as high.
15% of 360hp would be ~306rwhp...
I believe 15% was the right DT loss..but I may be mistaken.
An LS1 is an LS1...right? GM reported the Vette to have 350hp. It's likely they under-rated the Fbodies to justify the price difference between them and the Vettes. But why would they under-rate the Vette too? I don't think they need any justification for the price difference between a base Vette and a Z06.
Also, I might be wrong here, but aren't 03-04 Cobras good for about 390hp at the fly? If an Fbody had 375hp stock, then a lid should put us in the same league as the Cobras, correct? I'm not sure about my #s, but I am sure that I'd get my *** handed to me by a SC Cobra.
I haven't been dyno'd, but I believe about 300 RWHP sounds about right on average.
#18
Hey Hey Hey...I'm on cardomain and don't make any outrageous claims about my SS!
And even at 34yrs old,I still like p*ssy just as much as the next guy!So the "gay" theory is out the window!!!!!
And even at 34yrs old,I still like p*ssy just as much as the next guy!So the "gay" theory is out the window!!!!!
#19
Originally Posted by giant016
Also, I might be wrong here, but aren't 03-04 Cobras good for about 390hp at the fly? If an Fbody had 375hp stock, then a lid should put us in the same league as the Cobras, correct? I'm not sure about my #s, but I am sure that I'd get my *** handed to me by a SC Cobra.
I haven't been dyno'd, but I believe about 300 RWHP sounds about right on average.
I haven't been dyno'd, but I believe about 300 RWHP sounds about right on average.