An insult to ls1's! Wikipedia being biased!
11-07-2007, 04:34 PM
#201
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Round Rock, Texas
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
High performance or Tech Chevy (don't remember which) Ran a SS down the quarter with about the same times too. Dyno'd 329rwhp with a dirty filter and 40k miles or some such...neat article i might see if i can dig it up.
11-07-2007, 04:34 PM
#202
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: long island new york
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yea i know, i was just throwin that in...
both cars are good, i always liked camaros cause they were lower and sleeker, and im sure thats why the production stopped, cause they werent as appealing to the masses as a mustang. i dont mind losing to a mustang....as song as i beat all ricers lol
both cars are good, i always liked camaros cause they were lower and sleeker, and im sure thats why the production stopped, cause they werent as appealing to the masses as a mustang. i dont mind losing to a mustang....as song as i beat all ricers lol
11-07-2007, 04:39 PM
#204
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
camaros didnt stop selling because they were lower and sleeker. it was because they were slower and weaker!
Im totally just kidding about that, but it was cool how that rhymed!! But LS1 FTMFW!!
Im totally just kidding about that, but it was cool how that rhymed!! But LS1 FTMFW!!
11-07-2007, 04:39 PM
#205
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Round Rock, Texas
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
which is the nasty lil thing that gives the Z06 a run for the money....
11-07-2007, 04:44 PM
#207
On The Tree
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SN-95 Windsor (1994-1995)
SN-95 Windsor SVT Mustang Cobra
Manufacturer Ford Motor Company
Production 1994–1995
11,267 produced
Platform FR SN-95
Engine(s) 5.0 L Windsor V8
Transmission(s) 5-speed T-5 manual
Ford introduced a completely re-styled Mustang for the 1994 model year, but the vehicle was mechanically similar to the outgoing model, and rode on a version of Ford's aging Fox platform. Ford re-introduced the Cobra for 1994 featuring the new styling as well as larger brakes, a revised suspension setup and wider wheels than the outgoing version, but the engine was essentially a carryover.
It turns out, women loved the new Mustang design thanks to its girlish looks and limited power output. This helped contribute a majority of its sales.
SN-95 Windsor SVT Mustang Cobra
Manufacturer Ford Motor Company
Production 1994–1995
11,267 produced
Platform FR SN-95
Engine(s) 5.0 L Windsor V8
Transmission(s) 5-speed T-5 manual
Ford introduced a completely re-styled Mustang for the 1994 model year, but the vehicle was mechanically similar to the outgoing model, and rode on a version of Ford's aging Fox platform. Ford re-introduced the Cobra for 1994 featuring the new styling as well as larger brakes, a revised suspension setup and wider wheels than the outgoing version, but the engine was essentially a carryover.
It turns out, women loved the new Mustang design thanks to its girlish looks and limited power output. This helped contribute a majority of its sales.
11-07-2007, 04:44 PM
#208
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"As Stoddart alludes to, the GT's performance is incredible. For its January 2004 cover story, "Judgment Day!" a Car and Driver magazine test driver drove a Ford GT from 0-60 mph in 3.3 seconds. Car and Driver also recorded a quarter-mile time of 11.6 seconds at 128 mph. In the same test, Ferrari's $193,000 Challenge Stradale took four seconds to reach 60 mph and was 0.8 second and 13 mph slower through the quarter-mile."
11-07-2007, 04:45 PM
#209
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You have YET to come up with any information to prove what you have said. I posted why teh terminator competes/d with the Z06, you have yet to acknowledge that outside of..."i know why". There have been PLENTY more C6Z owners hitting low 11s factory stock, than there have been FGT owners. Again, you have yet to show otherwise. We all know the C6Z is a low 11 sec car..easily. FGTs are high 11s. Don't I read?.....boy please, so, because you state it on here, that means it is fact?....RIGHT. You have been wrong in darn near everything you have stated regarding mustangs....and you expect me to believe you on anything else..Ford related?
Yep...Ponygt65...funny how you go directly to 'poking fun' of my name...yet, can't offer up proof that any of your claims are truths. Yep....I own a lonely Mach....Just a few bolt ons..nothing to brag about. Why am I here?..well, if you read all of my posts, you would know that already...but we all know how you are with 'reading'.
11-07-2007, 04:48 PM
#210
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: long island new york
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lmao that was the best thing ive heard yet. this thread is gunna go on forever! its so much fun
11-07-2007, 04:48 PM
#211
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
11-07-2007, 04:49 PM
#212
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"As Stoddart alludes to, the GT's performance is incredible. For its January 2004 cover story, "Judgment Day!" a Car and Driver magazine test driver drove a Ford GT from 0-60 mph in 3.3 seconds. Car and Driver also recorded a quarter-mile time of 11.6 seconds at 128 mph. In the same test, Ferrari's $193,000 Challenge Stradale took four seconds to reach 60 mph and was 0.8 second and 13 mph slower through the quarter-mile."
I was so waiting for you to do a magazine/RICER post. ALL the ignorant TOOLZ resort to magazine crap....what's next?....my lowly mach is truely a mid to high 13 second car?
http://www.dragtimes.com/Ford-GT-Timeslip-9935.html - although that was in 95 degrees, I'll give you that.
http://www.fordgtforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=3364
11-07-2007, 04:53 PM
#214
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Round Rock, Texas
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Funny it seems those ignorant toolz are the only ones posting educated or factual posts....Also, it takes a 5.4L engine and a supercharger to get the performance of the N/A vette Z06. 
Not to mention it is only good for an extra 45HP, costing you nearly twice that of the Z06 vette.
The looks are amazing though, as well as the handling, what about the GTx1 i think it was?
Not to mention it is only good for an extra 45HP, costing you nearly twice that of the Z06 vette.
The looks are amazing though, as well as the handling, what about the GTx1 i think it was?
11-07-2007, 05:01 PM
#218
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Funny it seems those ignorant toolz are the only ones posting educated or factual posts....Also, it takes a 5.4L engine and a supercharger to get the performance of the N/A vette Z06.
Not to mention it is only good for an extra 45HP, costing you nearly twice that of the Z06 vette.
The looks are amazing though, as well as the handling, what about the GTx1 i think it was?
Not to mention it is only good for an extra 45HP, costing you nearly twice that of the Z06 vette.
The looks are amazing though, as well as the handling, what about the GTx1 i think it was?
When did I ever state the FGT was a better car....it was the KbraKlr member that stated that. Personally....I heavily agree with your point......C6Z is the best bang for buck for a true sports car and is a beast.
11-07-2007, 05:02 PM
#219
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts