General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.

Ever seen one?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-24-2008, 09:11 PM
  #41  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
SOMbitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,881
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cop Car
t tops are for ****

my car is one of 32.

hardtops are the ****. 1.5 60's with no subframes dumdumdum.

You are so cool cause you have a hardtop Ask the girl who's in sig what she would rather ride in As stated 4th gens were designed for T- tops so there is not much if any structural advantage. Wrinkles in the QP's are caused from from BRAKING with aftermarket CHASSIS mounted torque arms 99.9% of the time. Don't believe me ask any serious autocrosser or road racer. Not saying a stiffer chassis won't help handling but SFC's are way overated an these cars as are HT's. HT or SFC's are a waste for my purposes In short I think the HT advantage is waaaaaay overated.

Last edited by SOMbitch; 08-24-2008 at 09:23 PM.
Old 08-24-2008, 10:01 PM
  #42  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (31)
 
Black 99 Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: East, TN
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

My v6 bird was a stripper w/ a hardtop. I would love to have a stripper hardtop WS6 dumdumdumdumdum, that would be nice. However my t/a has t-tops w/ almost 100K on the clock and no leaks or issues.
Old 08-25-2008, 12:05 AM
  #43  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (28)
 
ZexGX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: under a JEGS hat
Posts: 2,793
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

*waves*

Brynnda offered to buy my car today. I told her $9k. Can you tell I want to keep my car? lol.

Last edited by ZexGX; 08-25-2008 at 12:16 AM.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:25 AM.