what oil to run.
After seeing my first cam become pitted after installing if for 8k miles and new lifters, i have added the ZDDP Plus additive for the last 14k miles on the new one, same specs, and no pitting to date. Makes me feel all happy in the pants, so i use it.
Over the past 11 or so years and knowing literally ~100 people with built stroker motors and aggressive head cam motors........not a single one of them that has used Synthetic makes it longer than the people who use cheap *** off the shelf oil. The jury is in.......synthetic is not as good as conventional.....it's just a marketing scam to make more money. And until I see some with a fully built stroker motor like my 427ci get anywhere near my 173,000, its pretty clear that conventional is better. Too many people over the years with bearing failures and other issues while using super duper special mystery magical synthetic oil at 40, 50, 60,000 miles on their built motors. Most also did their changes at 4,000-5,000 miles too......that's a BIG no-no.
.
My advice to anyone reading this thread is to do your own research. Lots of information about oil on sites like bobistheoilguy.com.
For example, in my boosted LS1, the oil analysis suggested Mobil 1 was totally inadequate. I've wound up with a 0W-30 Castrol and run it to 7,000ish miles. The chemical analysis shows no reason to change it sooner. In fact it suggests I run the oil longer but I get nervous.
Another example: In my (now sold) Silverado with the 8100, the analysis showed the conventional 5W-30s were breaking down from heat and showing a bit of bearing wear. The suggestion was made, based on what Blackstone has seen in the past on these engines, that I try a synthetic 5W-40 diesel oil. The results were much better, the oil tested well, and was good for 8,000-9,000 miles consistently.
In both these cases it was vehicles I beat on pretty hard (or towed with quite heavily). The analysis suggested I could have run the oils longer.
On the other hand, in a POS 96 Civic with 160K that I use as a commuter (150 miles per day for work), the analysis shows regular old Napa 5W-30 is still protecting it very well at 15,000 miles.
I say again, start with a quality oil, get it analyzed, and let your engine tell you what it wants.
My advice to anyone reading this thread is to do your own research. Lots of information about oil on sites like bobistheoilguy.com.
IF there were problems with these super stroker motors (I personally would rather go with a shorter stroke than even stock, and a larger bore to gain displacement, despite the slightly softer low end torque it gives), then it was NOT, I repeat, NOT the "fault" of a great synthetic oil.
To mistakenly believe so is just 'old school', ancient engine builder (and I KNOW that they know VERY little about oil technology, unlike the tribologists on bobistheoilguy.com!!) logic.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
as for oil viscosity choice, you choose viscosity based on ambient temperature and expected oil operating temperature. if you are in the north and cold starts happen below 50°F then you'll want to run a 5w oil. if your in a hot environment and expect running oil temps to exceed ~200° F especially in stop and go traffic where the motor will be idling hot below 800 rpm then you would want to choose a 15w40 or thicker oil.
choosing a synthetic is a waste of money because (a) there is no solid legal definition of synthetic oil and no guarantee of performance claims surrounding any brand of oil, and (b) for a car engine 95% of the time if you choose the right viscosity to begin with there is no need for a synthetic oil which may offer better cold starting flow or high temperature resistance. a synthetic does not let you run the oil for an extra xxx thousand miles to recoup purchase cost without the same amount of damage occurring that you would get with conventional oil, you still get blow by and wear particles building up over time. and claiming the additive pack in a synthetic is better than in a conventional is marketing bullshit and internet hype, there is no proof.
There's gonna be a million people tell you to get a certain oil that'll run you $40+ each oil change. Then there's gonna be another million saying to buy this particular oil and add zinc and NOS and all kinds of other ****(sarcasm for those who don't know it). Then theres gonna be people like me, who tell you to use the correct weight oil, filter and change it every 3000 miles. If this isn't an all out performance purpose engine than you can get the generic brand oil at walmart if you want. None of these engines have ever failed because of a particular brand of oil and they never will.
My advice to anyone reading this thread is to do your own research. Lots of information about oil on sites like bobistheoilguy.com.
They ALL use synthetic oils. I don't understand why people use it anymore. There is no proof that synthetics do anything better in the real world than conventional.......but there's hundreds and thousands of people out there with big stroker motors having to rebuild them WAY before the 100,000 mile mark. My 427ci was a beast till a rod broke at 173,000. Bearings were fine, a rod just finally failed. All conventional oil from day one. And 20w50 weight which MOST people say is terrible to use for an LSx engine. People just have no clue......they listen to marketing and friends that synthetic oil is magical.......so they go waste their money on it.
I guess we'll see how long my 390ci lasts. I'm betting way way past 150,000. Unless of course the TT kit takes it out........but that will be a fun way to go.
.
There's gonna be a million people tell you to get a certain oil that'll run you $40+ each oil change. Then there's gonna be another million saying to buy this particular oil and add zinc and NOS and all kinds of other ****(sarcasm for those who don't know it). Then theres gonna be people like me, who tell you to use the correct weight oil, filter and change it every 3000 miles. If this isn't an all out performance purpose engine than you can get the generic brand oil at walmart if you want. None of these engines have ever failed because of a particular brand of oil and they never will.
Clean oil is the ONLY thing we can do to make an engine last a long time. Nothing else matters. Every oil out there will work the same.......it just has to stay as clean as possible.
With my new 390ci I'm doing 3,000 mile changes and filter changes every 1,500 miles. Plus an oil filter magnet. When I got is new 390ci on the road I did an oil change after its first day of dyno tuning. Then at 50, 150, 300, 400 and 500 miles. The oil filter magnet was used always and still is on my oil filter. We cut the oil filter open with a band saw for the 400 mile change......there was a **** ton of metal shavings stuck to the inside of the oil filter can. Those things are awesome for catching tiny shavings.
4,000-5,000 mile changes.......that's just crazy to me.
.
I haven't seen anything that proves conventional oils are superior to synthetics. That was the blanket statement you made, but there is nothing solid to back it up.
Imagine for a moment that you did everything the same, but used a high quality synthetic oil instead. Based on your statement, you believe that your engine would have failed sooner than it did with the conventional oil. I see no evidence that this is a fact. Other peoples' engines cannot serve as a direct comparasion since there are several variables besides just the oil they used.
There are also plenty of UOAs which have shown improvements, with the same exact engine, by simply switcing oils. So to say that they are all exactly equal, in any given application, isn't really accurate.
However, I do agree with the fact that proper change interval for the application is far more important than the brand of oil that you choose.
I haven't seen anything that proves conventional oils are superior to synthetics. That was the blanket statement you made, but there is nothing solid to back it up.
This is not scientific proof that synthetics are inferior to conventional oil. This only proves that you took exceptional care of your engine, and that it was well built to begin with.
Imagine for a moment that you did everything the same, but used a high quality synthetic oil instead. Based on your statement, you believe that your engine would have failed sooner than it did with the conventional oil. I see no evidence that this is a fact. Other peoples' engines cannot serve as a direct comparasion since there are several variables besides just the oil they used.
There are certain cases where it's definitely not this simple. As mentioned above, things like zinc/phosphorus content do in fact matter in the context of a flat tappet engine, especially one with an aggressive cam profile. Not really a concern for the LSx crowd though.
There are also plenty of UOAs which have shown improvements, with the same exact engine, by simply switcing oils. So to say that they are all exactly equal, in any given application, isn't really accurate.
However, I do agree with the fact that proper change interval for the application is far more important than the brand of oil that you choose.
I haven't seen anything that proves conventional oils are superior to synthetics. That was the blanket statement you made, but there is nothing solid to back it up.
This is not scientific proof that synthetics are inferior to conventional oil. This only proves that you took exceptional care of your engine, and that it was well built to begin with.
Imagine for a moment that you did everything the same, but used a high quality synthetic oil instead. Based on your statement, you believe that your engine would have failed sooner than it did with the conventional oil. I see no evidence that this is a fact. Other peoples' engines cannot serve as a direct comparasion since there are several variables besides just the oil they used.
There are certain cases where it's definitely not this simple. As mentioned above, things like zinc/phosphorus content do in fact matter in the context of a flat tappet engine, especially one with an aggressive cam profile. Not really a concern for the LSx crowd though.
There are also plenty of UOAs which have shown improvements, with the same exact engine, by simply switcing oils. So to say that they are all exactly equal, in any given application, isn't really accurate.
However, I do agree with the fact that proper change interval for the application is far more important than the brand of oil that you choose.
Doesn't matter what kind of LSx engine........the #1 thing we can do is to have clean oil inside of it for as much time as possible.
I am 100% positive that if I had used synthetic oil and done the ridiculous 4,000-5,000 mile oil changes that dozens and dozens of people I know through the years with LSx engines have done.......there is absolutely no way my engine would have lasted as long as it did. It would have lasted as long as all their identical engines would have lasted....from builders such as LPE, Katech, TSP, all the known builders..........in the range of 40,000-60,000, maybe someone has logged more, not positive.
Actually one other guy with a Vette had a iron 421ci built by a local guy that has over 100,000 and has been spraying it with a 300 shot for years now.....but he uses conventional oil too.
That's some pretty good statistical data since 1998 when we all started buying our LSx cars. Talking upwards of 100 people I know through the years.
How is that not good data.........to know that synthetic oil simply does not protect an LSx engine as good as conventional. Everyone I know that uses synthetic has all kinds of troubles......all kinds. Then their engine dies......
It's the same ole story around here every time someone posts about their engine letting go or dying.......they are always synthetic oil users.
.....And I didn't take care of my engine in any spectacular way. Oil filter and oil changes every 3,000 miles. That's it. Maybe did 2 serpentine belt changes. 1 alternator. 1 starter. Air filters and fuel filters.
That's actually not even close to most car fanatics out there. What I did was the minimum necessary for car care.
.
Last edited by LS6427; Nov 27, 2013 at 08:28 PM.
There is no design difference between the Corvette and F-body LS1s, so what's OK or good for one is OK or good for both.
Therefore, there is no merit to his claim that GM didn't "design" these engines for such an oil.






