WS6 has no balls
Anyways, time went on and I bought a Trans Am roller to swap everything back over including the rear end from the V6 body, as I was told the rear in the TA roller was no good. Ended up selling the car to my brother in the process so we ended up cam swapping it and doing LT's, full exhaust etc. Tune time comes along so I'm driving conservatively to the shop but I still get on it a little bit like anyone else would and I was like damn this thing does not move like it used to stock, but I wasnt really getting into to it so I brushed it off because it wasn't tuned yet.. Went to the tune shop and had fuel problems. Ended up driving home and the fuel pump died in front of my driveway after sitting in traffic for an hour, so I got lucky as hell on making it home lol.
Changed the fuel pump to a Racetronix 255lph and also the fuel filter, so all was good fuel pressure wise. My brother took it back for a retune and then there was a problem with the MAF so the tuner just tuned it SD. Ended up dynoing in at 409rwhp. Yesterday I asked my brother if I could drive it and holy ****.. I got on it in 2nd gear and I just turned to my brother confused as hell lol. The car literally does not pick up at all like it used to in stock form. No torque whatsoever. I feel like my 1998 Camry 4 cylinder would drag that thing lol.
Any ideas on WTF is wrong with this car? Car literally has the Mustang effect. Loud as hell but doesnt go anywhere. I'm stumped on this one.

Last edited by INTIMIDATOR_LSX; Apr 6, 2018 at 08:08 PM.
Also, how is the clutch?
Trending Topics
What are the specs of your cam? At what rpm are you shifting at WOT ?
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Is there any chance the clutch is failing/suspect? I know it made good dyno numbers, but perhaps it was on the border of being marginal?
Just an FYI, there isn't really much performance difference between the 2.73 and 3.23 rears in the 4L60E cars. I've owned two of each. The 2.73 cars actually aren't much slower, 1-2 tenths/1-2mph with the stock torque converter (less with a 3500+ stall). It wouldn't make the kind of difference you're talking about.
On the other hand, if you put a 2.73 rear with the T56, that might feel pretty sluggish, especially with a cam, in the lower rpms. But I don't think you said anything about changing the rear/gear during this process (or did I misunderstand?)
Based on this:
...my impression was that it just felt bad under a WOT pull. But, it could still be fuel pressure related, perhaps the new pump was faulty or some other issue has developed with the stock bucket (assuming you just did a pump only swap).
Is there any chance the clutch is failing/suspect? I know it made good dyno numbers, but perhaps it was on the border of being marginal?
Just an FYI, there isn't really much performance difference between the 2.73 and 3.23 rears in the 4L60E cars. I've owned two of each. The 2.73 cars actually aren't much slower, 1-2 tenths/1-2mph with the stock torque converter (less with a 3500+ stall). It wouldn't make the kind of difference you're talking about.
On the other hand, if you put a 2.73 rear with the T56, that might feel pretty sluggish, especially with a cam, in the lower rpms. But I don't think you said anything about changing the rear/gear during this process (or did I misunderstand?)
4L60E has a more aggressive internal first gear ratio than a T56 (3.06 vs 2.66), so the auto cars don't need as much rear gear to get similar mechanical advantage throughout 1st gear as the M6 versions (plus torque multiplication of the converter at launch for an auto). That's why I mentioned that a T56 with a 2.73 and a cam that's shifted the powerband higher could in fact feel pretty sluggish at low rpms. But, that's obviously not the case here since you said it still has the 3.42s and the lack of torque seems to exist in any gear/rpm, WOT or not.









