Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

What should I get next, slp maf or ud pulley?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-10-2009, 08:03 PM
  #21  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by massls1guy
Might as well post all the info on your gain - before/after dyno graphs, SAE or STD. What cam and other mods you had and what parts were stock. Exactly what you changed on the car when you saw the 34hp gain. If the fast was stock or ported for more $$. How many months you had the fast intake on your car.
dont have the graphs with me at the moment...

it was 351rwhp... ms4 cam LT's 4k stall 323s

then 385rwhp... ms4 cam LT's 4k stall 410s ported 90/90

on both runs if its no listed as changed, it was stock.. (supporting mods were there of course, springs, pushrods...)

im going to guess i would have still picked up the same with a regular 90/90 if i wouldnt have put the gears in....

i paid 900 for the complete setup... i feel it was well worth 34rwhp..
Old 01-10-2009, 08:58 PM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
massls1guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mass
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lemons12
dont have the graphs with me at the moment...

it was 351rwhp... ms4 cam LT's 4k stall 323s

then 385rwhp... ms4 cam LT's 4k stall 410s ported 90/90

on both runs if its no listed as changed, it was stock.. (supporting mods were there of course, springs, pushrods...)

im going to guess i would have still picked up the same with a regular 90/90 if i wouldnt have put the gears in....

i paid 900 for the complete setup... i feel it was well worth 34rwhp..
Interesting mix of parts there. I'll bet the car was pretty fast at the track.

I guess going from an LS1 intake on that setup to a ported fast would give a pretty good gain. Makes me wonder how an LS6 intake and ported TB would have done to compare.
Old 01-10-2009, 11:29 PM
  #23  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by massls1guy
Interesting mix of parts there. I'll bet the car was pretty fast at the track.

I guess going from an LS1 intake on that setup to a ported fast would give a pretty good gain. Makes me wonder how an LS6 intake and ported TB would have done to compare.
yea, its all coming together more now..... she does good at the track.. going in 1 month and hoping for a 6.9@96.... but who knows?

i knew it had picked up a lot... i could REALLY feel the difference, even before the tune.. i picked up another 12rwhp out of the tune if i remember correctly..

i went from a stock intake with a ported TB.. forgot to mention that... with that said, im going to guess the ls6 intake would pick up 15rwhp... so the fast was about 20 more rwhp... thats worth it to me, not to some..
Old 01-10-2009, 11:57 PM
  #24  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
chrs1313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,697
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lemons12
yea, its all coming together more now..... she does good at the track.. going in 1 month and hoping for a 6.9@96.... but who knows?

i knew it had picked up a lot... i could REALLY feel the difference, even before the tune.. i picked up another 12rwhp out of the tune if i remember correctly..

i went from a stock intake with a ported TB.. forgot to mention that... with that said, im going to guess the ls6 intake would pick up 15rwhp... so the fast was about 20 more rwhp... thats worth it to me, not to some..
your car must be pretty light then if you wanna run 6.9...especially with only putting down 385rwhp...unless it was a mustang dyno, still got your work cutout...good luck
Old 01-11-2009, 12:37 AM
  #25  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by chrs1313
your car must be pretty light then if you wanna run 6.9...especially with only putting down 385rwhp...unless it was a mustang dyno, still got your work cutout...good luck
i put down more than 385 now.. i was just letting him know what i made with those mods....

im pretty sure i will hit my 6.9 mark.. but i will see soon enough..

and yes, that dyno reads about 20 low..

the car is pretty light also..

Last edited by lemons12; 01-11-2009 at 04:19 PM.
Old 01-11-2009, 08:33 AM
  #26  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (77)
 
01 BERGER CAMARO SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 2 Miles from the Brder Wall, Tx
Posts: 718
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

UD pulley
Old 01-11-2009, 09:11 AM
  #27  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (6)
 
MonmouthCtyLS7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rotonda West Florida
Posts: 3,955
Received 30 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

Neither, save for something bigger




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:28 AM.