What should I get next, slp maf or ud pulley?
#21
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Might as well post all the info on your gain - before/after dyno graphs, SAE or STD. What cam and other mods you had and what parts were stock. Exactly what you changed on the car when you saw the 34hp gain. If the fast was stock or ported for more $$. How many months you had the fast intake on your car.
it was 351rwhp... ms4 cam LT's 4k stall 323s
then 385rwhp... ms4 cam LT's 4k stall 410s ported 90/90
on both runs if its no listed as changed, it was stock.. (supporting mods were there of course, springs, pushrods...)
im going to guess i would have still picked up the same with a regular 90/90 if i wouldnt have put the gears in....
i paid 900 for the complete setup... i feel it was well worth 34rwhp..
#22
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mass
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
dont have the graphs with me at the moment...
it was 351rwhp... ms4 cam LT's 4k stall 323s
then 385rwhp... ms4 cam LT's 4k stall 410s ported 90/90
on both runs if its no listed as changed, it was stock.. (supporting mods were there of course, springs, pushrods...)
im going to guess i would have still picked up the same with a regular 90/90 if i wouldnt have put the gears in....
i paid 900 for the complete setup... i feel it was well worth 34rwhp..
it was 351rwhp... ms4 cam LT's 4k stall 323s
then 385rwhp... ms4 cam LT's 4k stall 410s ported 90/90
on both runs if its no listed as changed, it was stock.. (supporting mods were there of course, springs, pushrods...)
im going to guess i would have still picked up the same with a regular 90/90 if i wouldnt have put the gears in....
i paid 900 for the complete setup... i feel it was well worth 34rwhp..
I guess going from an LS1 intake on that setup to a ported fast would give a pretty good gain. Makes me wonder how an LS6 intake and ported TB would have done to compare.
#23
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i knew it had picked up a lot... i could REALLY feel the difference, even before the tune.. i picked up another 12rwhp out of the tune if i remember correctly..
i went from a stock intake with a ported TB.. forgot to mention that... with that said, im going to guess the ls6 intake would pick up 15rwhp... so the fast was about 20 more rwhp... thats worth it to me, not to some..
#24
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
yea, its all coming together more now..... she does good at the track.. going in 1 month and hoping for a 6.9@96.... but who knows?
i knew it had picked up a lot... i could REALLY feel the difference, even before the tune.. i picked up another 12rwhp out of the tune if i remember correctly..
i went from a stock intake with a ported TB.. forgot to mention that... with that said, im going to guess the ls6 intake would pick up 15rwhp... so the fast was about 20 more rwhp... thats worth it to me, not to some..
i knew it had picked up a lot... i could REALLY feel the difference, even before the tune.. i picked up another 12rwhp out of the tune if i remember correctly..
i went from a stock intake with a ported TB.. forgot to mention that... with that said, im going to guess the ls6 intake would pick up 15rwhp... so the fast was about 20 more rwhp... thats worth it to me, not to some..
#25
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
im pretty sure i will hit my 6.9 mark.. but i will see soon enough..
and yes, that dyno reads about 20 low..
the car is pretty light also..
Last edited by lemons12; 01-11-2009 at 04:19 PM.