Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

My catch can routing ok?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-24-2015, 04:26 PM
  #601  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
JimMueller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Casselberry FL
Posts: 3,964
Received 52 Likes on 43 Posts

Default

I have an LS3 in a F-body. Mine is valley cover > Norris catch can inlet > catch can outlet > tube containing stock-type PCV valve > manifold. Would it be okay to remove the external PCV valve in the tube so I can run generic tubing between the can and manifold?
Old 10-24-2015, 06:10 PM
  #602  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
99Bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: C. V., Kalifornia
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

You'll still want something you can either insert inside the 3/8" ID hose to snuggly to use as a fixed orifice restrictor, or fixed orifice pcv valve with a 3/8" hose end on both sides. If you buy one at your autoparts store, or make one make sure the hole in it is no bigger(preferably smaller) than 1/8" . That way so you can drill the hole to a larger size if needed. The restrictor type gm uses now have about a 1/8" hole so that should be a good starting point.

Last edited by 99Bluz28; 10-24-2015 at 06:16 PM.
Old 10-28-2015, 10:39 PM
  #603  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
Russ K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Regina, Sask
Posts: 809
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JimMueller
I have an LS3 in a F-body. Mine is valley cover > Norris catch can inlet > catch can outlet > tube containing stock-type PCV valve > manifold. Would it be okay to remove the external PCV valve in the tube so I can run generic tubing between the can and manifold?
LS3's don't have a pcv valve. The restricter is built in the valley cover. So, yes you can use standard pcv hose between the catch can & intake manifold and between the catch can & valley cover.

Russ Kemp
Old 12-29-2015, 04:19 PM
  #604  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
87caprice318's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: louisiana
Posts: 297
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

nice thread
Old 02-01-2016, 12:21 AM
  #605  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
tuske427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 291
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by coSPEED2
Not if done correctly with the proper system. IM vacuum can be the primary evacuation suction source and the area just in front of the throttle body will still have measurable suction at WOT when the IM vacuum drops to zero due to reversion pulses. You have to get above 8,000 RPM or so before the reversion pulses from a LS engine reach past the TB. And if you deal with the celanside properly, then you should never have pressure build. You wont be able to maintain vacuum like with a belt driven vacuum pump with a adjustable vacuum relief valve, but still can avoid any pressure unlike a system that vents to the atmosphere after pressure already builds enough to crack the vent valve. You can, even with a turbo or centri SC applications accomplish evacuation pull on the crankcase at all times AND retain a closed EPA compliant system.

I was curious about doing something like this because having my engine just vented open wasn't enough for my engine at an open track day the other weekend which caused oil to blow past my dipstick tube all over the engine bay after my first lap on the track (much better than losing the main seal) I've since made it the closed system with my Rev Xtreme per the LS1 layouts shown earlier in this thread, and I've found that if I add a second "1 way valve" on the hose from the pass valve cover to the TB it makes a vacuum in the crankcase area immediately (air whooshes in the dipstick tube when I open it). I get why it does this...

I was wondering if I could add this 1 way valve and run my car like this on track days for the added vacuum and remove it for normal street driving. Thoughts?

I'm just concerned about crankcase pressure causing more damage...

Engine is as follows:

383 stroker NA LS1 pump gas
553hp
ported LS6 heads/ matched cam
redline 6800
Rev Xtreme catch can
Melling 10296 high volume oil pump (oil psi is around 80 with 20w 50 oil)
2300 miles on engine
Old 11-01-2016, 12:16 AM
  #606  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JWStevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Reading this makes me sad.... I always cap my intake off and vent my valve covers on all my cars. I'm doing a motor swap right now after 263k miles and the motor still ran fine. I just can't see putting hot crankcase air in my intake that I want cold air going into. Not to mention the oil vapor. I'm just gonna be happy with not knowing what you guys are talking about. No dip stick issues, no leaking seals, and normal oil changes....
Old 11-01-2016, 12:04 PM
  #607  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (59)
 
MIGHTYMOUSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 10,010
Received 45 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JWStevens
Reading this makes me sad.... I always cap my intake off and vent my valve covers on all my cars. I'm doing a motor swap right now after 263k miles and the motor still ran fine. I just can't see putting hot crankcase air in my intake that I want cold air going into. Not to mention the oil vapor. I'm just gonna be happy with not knowing what you guys are talking about. No dip stick issues, no leaking seals, and normal oil changes....

well ignorance is bliss, i guess you are also going back to carburetion with that outlook?
Old 11-01-2016, 07:54 PM
  #608  
TECH Senior Member
 
joecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: So.Cal.
Posts: 6,077
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

That is the whole purpose of the correctly designed/plumbed baffled catchcan (to pull oil/vapor out so it won't be sucked into intake);

it has been shown by the car makers that a light negative pressure in the crankcase does keep the external seals from leaking, and that it pulls moisture from the oil.
Old 11-02-2016, 09:44 PM
  #609  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JWStevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nah, it's a cam only LS7, but I do have a carbed 5.3 in my Sonoma. I'm sorry, I'm 41 and I've never had any of those issues. I would like to know how not running it back into the intake makes your oil dirty. I have heard plenty of theory, but I just never see the issues in reality.
Old 11-02-2016, 10:00 PM
  #610  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JWStevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

And I do have an Elite catch can, it's just not going to my intake.
Old 11-02-2016, 10:28 PM
  #611  
TECH Senior Member
 
joecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: So.Cal.
Posts: 6,077
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JWStevens
And I do have an Elite catch can, it's just not going to my intake.
So why do you even need it (you're just venting to air)...?
Old 11-02-2016, 10:31 PM
  #612  
TECH Senior Member
 
joecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: So.Cal.
Posts: 6,077
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

A lot of people have had trouble with oil getting pulled in and pooling on floor of intake manifold.
Old 11-03-2016, 08:17 AM
  #613  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JWStevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by joecar
A lot of people have had trouble with oil getting pulled in and pooling on floor of intake manifold.
I never said I didn't have that issue. That's one of the reasons I don't hook it back to my intake. I got the catch can to keep the vapors out of my engine bay.
Old 11-03-2016, 09:39 AM
  #614  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (59)
 
MIGHTYMOUSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 10,010
Received 45 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

any gas byproducts (if not drawn off) will settle into the oil, to name a few
-carbon monoxide
-sulfur dioxide
-formaldehyde
any vapors (if not drawn off) will condense and drain into the oil
-fuel
-water
any heavy particulate waste 'soot' (if not drawn off) will mix into the oil
-carbons of several types

you would have to be a chemist to evaluate it vs 'see' it but the soot build up is normally visible by 2000 miles if you were to compare apples to apples.
Old 11-03-2016, 08:52 PM
  #615  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JWStevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I did AOAP samples in the army so I am familiar with contaminated oil samples. The very mild vacuum isn't enough to draw off those things any better than the crankcase pressure will blow it out on its own in my opinion and even if it did create a slight advantage in that area passing it though a catch can isn't going to contain much more than oil vapor and then you are burning things that could be taking the place of fuel and oxygen, not to mention creating build-up on the top end of your motor that you can't get out by simply changing the oil (supposing there is actually contamination). Look, you guys are obviously way smarter than I am so I'll let you have it from here. I don't have anything to sell so I'll just keep doing it the old backwoods way....
Old 11-04-2016, 10:11 AM
  #616  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (59)
 
MIGHTYMOUSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 10,010
Received 45 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

Ok good luck to you.

I don't sell PCV; It already comes stock on all gas automobiles (the theory is for no reason I heard).

I sell answers to problems to help people enjoy their hobby.
Old 11-09-2016, 06:42 PM
  #617  
Teching In
 
Txw1ck3d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Amarillo Texas
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey 405HP Z06 can you send me a link to that catch can? your setup is very sweet.
Old 11-15-2016, 07:45 PM
  #618  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
BrntWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Land of the FOID
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Had the RX can on for awhile with the check valve breather on the oil cap (TB tube capped off). Noticed im getting blow by up the dirty side of the cc tube going into the intake. Removed the stock PCV valve since the RX can has one built in, maybe I should put that back in?

This is how mine is routed with the exception of the TB fresh air tube:
Name:  pcv-1ls1ext.jpg
Views: 1683
Size:  50.2 KB

Last edited by BrntWS6; 11-15-2016 at 08:37 PM.
Old 11-16-2016, 01:24 AM
  #619  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
SlasherVRGR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: NEPA
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by BrntWS6
Had the RX can on for awhile with the check valve breather on the oil cap (TB tube capped off). Noticed im getting blow by up the dirty side of the cc tube going into the intake. Removed the stock PCV valve since the RX can has one built in, maybe I should put that back in?

This is how mine is routed with the exception of the TB fresh air tube:
I have this exact hose setup with a different can. I have a check valve in the clean hose so it can only pull air into the valve cover.
Old 11-16-2016, 06:47 AM
  #620  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
BrntWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Land of the FOID
Posts: 2,005
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

^^ I have a check valve as well on the valve cover for when I was getting oil through the TB hose. It solved that problem but now oil is coming through the catch can hose side that is attached to the intake manifold.


Quick Reply: My catch can routing ok?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:06 AM.