Need Help with Fast Intake Decision**
Used Fast 90mm (ported preferably)
New non-ported Fast 92mm
New ported Fast 92mm
Is it worth it to get a Fast 92mm?
Are the gains in a non ported Fast 92mm significant over a ported 90mm
Going with a ported LS2 TB no matter what intake I end up getting.
Motor is a 6.0L iron block 415ci 244/248 .612/.615 112.
All Pro Heads (ported)
Flow great mid range and 354cfm @.6
Looking for quality info, thanks guys
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Last edited by JeaneZ28; Oct 4, 2009 at 05:36 PM.
How is porting of the mouth only done when there is a bigger TB. For instance Vengeance sells their intake as 96 mm with or without TB. If you want you could still put a 92 mm TB on the intake.
No offense but there is "porting" a FAST and then there is porting a FAST.
It all sounds the same doesn't it.....your buddy says "Hey....I have a ported FAST" (then the next guy) "Hey....I have a ported FAST also". Problem is in most cases the work performed wont look (or work) the same. In fact I have seen some "ported FAST's" make 5-10 RWHP less than a stocker unported. Dont think Im BS'ing cause Im not.
I have about half a coffee can full of plastic chips using a carbide cutter when I port one of these intakes. Not to mention many hours invested in spite of the fact I have done it so much I feel I might be able to do it in my sleep now having perfected the process five years and a couple of hundred intakes later.
Im not so much trying to sell my work here (which admittedly is on the pricier side) as much as I am trying to sober some of you up recommending a novice go in and "sand some things smooth" thinking they really accomplished anything. I see all these pics of sandrolled runners and parts of the intake fussed with that has ZERO impact on airflow (as checked and verified on my flowbench years ago) and I shake my head....most of it isn't even addressing the shortcomings in the shape of the manifold. You need real plastic removal in the right places to truly increase the airflow and you need to leave material in other key places which I often see removed.
Some of what I see sold these days is more fluff work than anything else but how would you know unless you had seen a properly modified intake to compare it to? Answer is you wont know, and some shops count on it, while you bolt it on hoping the money you spent was worth something.
Is it any different than "ported heads".....think there is a difference between a premium CNC ported aftermarket casting and most ported OEM castings. At this point I think the answer to that most of the sharper among you know.....there is nothing different about a ported intake as well so trust who you enlist to do the work before you hand them over your $800 hunk of plastic.
OK....Im off my soapbox for now (off, coincidentally, to finish a customer's FAST I am working on....LOL). We now bring you back to the "matrix" (aka the Internet), where all ported FAST intakes are equal regardless of price and who handles the work.....even a novice at home can achieve similar results.
(But in the REAL WORLD.....you always get what you pay for. The wiser and likely older you get the more you will come to appreciate that simple life lesson).
Regards,
Tony
Last edited by Tony Mamo @ AFR; Oct 4, 2009 at 06:15 PM.
No offense but there is "porting" a FAST and then there is porting a FAST.
It all sounds the same doesn't it.....your buddy says "Hey....I have a ported FAST" (then the next guy) "Hey....I have a ported FAST also". Problem is in most cases the work performed wont look (or work) the same. In fact I have seen some "ported FAST's" make 5-10 RWHP less than a stocker unported. Dont think Im BS'ing cause Im not.
I have about half a coffee can full of plastic chips using a carbide cutter when I port one of these intakes. Not to mention many hours invested in spite of the fact I have done it so much I feel I might be able to do it in my sleep now having perfected the process five years and a couple of hundred intakes later.
Im not so much trying to sell my work here (which admittedly is on the pricier side) as much as I am trying to sober some of you up recommending a novice go in and "sand some things smooth" thinking they really accomplished anything. I see all these pics of sandrolled runners and parts of the intake fussed with that has ZERO impact on airflow (as checked and verified on my flowbench years ago) and I shake my head....most of it isn't even addressing the shortcomings in the shape of the manifold. You need real plastic removal in the right places to truly increase the airflow and you need to leave material in other key places which I often see removed.
Some of what I see sold these days is more fluff work than anything else but how would you know unless you had seen a properly modified intake to compare it to? Answer is you wont know, and some shops count on it, while you bolt it on hoping the money you spent was worth something.
Is it any different than "ported heads".....think there is a difference between a premium CNC ported aftermarket casting and most ported OEM castings. At this point I think the answer to that most of the sharper among you know.....there is nothing different about a ported intake as well so trust who you enlist to do the work before you hand them over your $800 hunk of plastic.
OK....Im off my soapbox for now (off, coincidentally, to finish a customer's FAST I am working on....LOL). We now bring you back to the "matrix" (aka the Internet), where all ported FAST intakes are equal regardless of price and who handles the work.....even a novice at home can achieve similar results.
(But in the REAL WORLD.....you always get what you pay for. The wiser and likely older you get the more you will come to appreciate that simple life lesson).
Regards,
Tony
Sorry if it looked like I was coming down on you personally. In short, I don't think what you did probably hurt anything, but I question whether it actually helped anything either. Would have to really see it and ultimately flow a head with it attached to really quantify the value of the work you performed (I test intakes by seeing how they effect the net airflow to the head....flowing an intake by itself is also a meaningless exercise some people/shops refer to). An intake manifold represents an extension of the intake port.....shape it right and it picks up.....shape it wrong and it hurts it, no different than shaping the actual intake port in such a way it hurts (or helps) airflow.
For a better understanding, flow an intake port with a radius plate attached (best case scenario).....then flow it thru an LS1 intake.....watch close to 50 CFM's vanish from the peak. Flow it with a stock LS6....watch 42-44 CFM's vanish. Then a FAST unported.....drops the loss to 35 or so. A properly ported unit can see that number drop another 10-12 CFM's or so. The intake port hasn't changed or even moved off the flowbench but swapping intakes has led the engine (flowbench in this case) to believe it just got that much better an intake port bolted on it and will respond accordingly by processing more of that air into energy and power at your rear wheels with the proper addition of fuel to compensate for it. No different than bolting on a higher flowing set of heads really....at least as far as just the intake port is concerned.
Hope this helps....
-Tony
PS....$550 is what I charge to port a new FAST. Its pretty much been that price for the last three years or so. Some of the stuff I see now is priced so low now you have to ask yourself what could they actually be doing for the money charged
. I just did'nt want to do "too much" because lets face it, I did'nt fully know what I was doing. I wish I could have done a back to back dyno test to see the real gains but for the $200 it was going to cost, I decided otherwise. In regards to the 90 vs 92 FAST, it may come as a surprise that the choke in the system is not the mouth of the TB opening, but the runners of the intake. Here, a ported FAST 90 makes more power than a non ported FAST 92. Before revision J, the older FAST 90s flowed better than the REV J 90s and later FAST 92s (which also had the Rev J changes).
If you can find a pre-REV J FAST 90, they will make the most power when ported by Tony Mamo. I've seen gains of 30+rwhp over an LS6 intake.

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
In regards to the 90 vs 92 FAST, it may come as a surprise that the choke in the system is not the mouth of the TB opening, but the runners of the intake. Here, a ported FAST 90 makes more power than a non ported FAST 92. Before revision J, the older FAST 90s flowed better than the REV J 90s and later FAST 92s (which also had the Rev J changes).
If you can find a pre-REV J FAST 90, they will make the most power when ported by Tony Mamo. I've seen gains of 30+rwhp over an LS6 intake.
I have finally gotten a good handle on how to carefully work around Revision "J" (add a "unk"....LOL).
Still dont know what Comp/FAST was thinking with that deal but oh well. I now have those two runners flowing within a couple of CFM of the other six runners without the hump in the wall. Havent talked to you in awhile discussing that but I have a pretty good plan of attack now regarding how I grind and shape that area which seems to work pretty well. A couple of CFM net less to the cylinder (flowing the head with the intake attached) is likely not going to be seen....especially considering only two of the eight ports are effected. At this point I don't think one of my former 90mm ported units would work any better come dyno time now and the stainless fasteners and better O-ring design of the 92 is a nice perk getting into the later model unit.
Just an FYI

Vengeace pairs those manifolds up with bigger mouth throttle bodies




