Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

k&N filter vs. paper filter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 07:03 PM
  #1  
ls1curt's Avatar
Thread Starter
8 Second Club
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 3
From: CT
Default k&N filter vs. paper filter

hey, i was wondering if a k&N air filter will actually give me any hp over a cheap autozone paper filter? is it worth $60? and will a p&p throttle body give me any good hp gains?
thanks
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 07:09 PM
  #2  
therealcreeper's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,404
Likes: 14
Default

supposedly running no filter at all vs air filter is a 1-3hp difference so i would doubt the K&N would do anything at all power-wise. the real benefit is that you can clean it so you never have to replace it. there are also debates about whether they actually filter as well as paper and whether the oil used to clean them messes up the MAF but i don't know if there's any truth to either of those.

you'll feel a difference in throttle response with a ported tb and pick up a few hp. if you're handy with a dremel just DIY and you'll save yourself some money
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 07:09 PM
  #3  
conan's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,492
Likes: 6
From: Back in the Burg
Default

I like the K/N because you can wash them so you will get your money back over time. But as far as a power gain not realy. A P/P throttle body is worth a few HP. If your looking for some more power... Might be time for a cam.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 07:38 PM
  #4  
speedfreak2685's Avatar
TECH Resident
20 Year Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
Default

The K&N is NOT worth it. I just took mine out and relplaced it with a Fram paper filter. There are threads on here about paper filters out filtering a k&n and how the oil on the k&n filter can and will come off and clog your maf but I dont have them handy right now. Also the guy that tunes my car did a dyno test with a k&n, stock paper filter, and no filter at all and they all made the same power and he has a 485HP head and cam car. Another thing that turns me away from a k&n is they are about $60. A paper filter (Fram in my case) is about $10. You are recomended to replace a paper filter every 15000 miles. I put about 5000 miles a year on my car. That being said, It would take me 12 years if im correct to start saving money with the washable k&n. Just my 2cents
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 08:30 PM
  #5  
99T/A_Marine's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: Camp Lejeune/Raleigh, NC
Default

If you over-oil it then it is more restrictive as well. What's paying $10 for a paper filter and never having to do guesswork with re-oiling it?
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 09:40 PM
  #6  
ShortChevy's Avatar
12 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
From: Muskegon, MI
Default

I had one becuase it was like an extra $20 bucks or something when I bought my lid. That being said it isn't even on there anymore. I just run paper frams and replace them like 5k miles. I have a the free ram air mod done and it makes the filters dirty. Even thought I highly doubt the dirt I am seeing on the Frams is restricting them in anyway I still replace them becuase they cheap. My K&N made my MAF all oily and I never cleaned it or oiled it. All facotry oiling.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 09:41 PM
  #7  
ShortChevy's Avatar
12 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
From: Muskegon, MI
Default

I had one becuase it was like an extra $20 bucks or something when I bought my lid. That being said it isn't even on there anymore. I just run paper frams and replace them like 5k miles. I have a the free ram air mod done and it makes the filters dirty. Even thought I highly doubt the dirt I am seeing on the Frams is restricting them in anyway I still replace them becuase they cheap. My K&N made my MAF all oily and I never cleaned it or oiled it. All factory oiling.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 09:51 PM
  #8  
99Bluz28's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 11
From: C. V., Kalifornia
Default

I would just run the fram, or the AMSoil cleanable dry filter.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 09:52 PM
  #9  
themack56's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (70)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, California (818)
Default

Originally Posted by speedfreak2685
The K&N is NOT worth it. I just took mine out and relplaced it with a Fram paper filter. There are threads on here about paper filters out filtering a k&n and how the oil on the k&n filter can and will come off and clog your maf but I dont have them handy right now. Also the guy that tunes my car did a dyno test with a k&n, stock paper filter, and no filter at all and they all made the same power and he has a 485HP head and cam car. Another thing that turns me away from a k&n is they are about $60. A paper filter (Fram in my case) is about $10. You are recomended to replace a paper filter every 15000 miles. I put about 5000 miles a year on my car. That being said, It would take me 12 years if im correct to start saving money with the washable k&n. Just my 2cents
only if you over oil them, ive never had any issue with my k n filter. no oil in my maf.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2009 | 08:59 AM
  #10  
ls1curt's Avatar
Thread Starter
8 Second Club
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 3
From: CT
Default

okay thanks guys guess ill be sticking to my paper filter then. how bout the ported tb. has anyone done one themself or is it not even worth wasting my time/money on
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2009 | 09:04 AM
  #11  
RevGTO's Avatar
Pontiacerator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,216
Likes: 236
From: Wichita KS / Rancho San Diego
Default

Ported tb makes a huge difference in throttle response, but I didn't see anything at the track from it. The throttle response alone makes it well worth it, IMO.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2009 | 09:41 AM
  #12  
slt200mph's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,067
Likes: 9
From: HOT'LANA, GAWJA
Default

Originally Posted by RevGTO
Ported tb makes a huge difference in throttle response, but I didn't see anything at the track from it. The throttle response alone makes it well worth it, IMO.
A ported and polished TB will make 5 HP maybe 6 HP and better throttle response...it is very hard to feel or measure 5 HP at the track...might be good for one, two, or three hundreds of a second on your ET and you know that anything can vary a ET that small number. But it all adds up in the end...no such thing as too much HP/TQ ... so do it you will not be sorry ...
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2009 | 09:52 AM
  #13  
ls1curt's Avatar
Thread Starter
8 Second Club
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 3
From: CT
Default

ok, it sounds like a good mod then, just for the better throttle response. did you guys port it yourself or send it out and have it ported?
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2009 | 09:54 AM
  #14  
therealcreeper's Avatar
TECH Addict
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,404
Likes: 14
Default

do it yourself, there's a lot of good writeups on it
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2009 | 10:05 AM
  #15  
Out Of Focus's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
From: Evansville, IN
Default

Originally Posted by ls1curt
ok, it sounds like a good mod then, just for the better throttle response. did you guys port it yourself or send it out and have it ported?
I had BriancWS6 port mine and he did a great job.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2009 | 11:05 AM
  #16  
TXZ28LS1's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,163
Likes: 3
From: Classified
Default

i also wondered the same thing. i had my K & N filter for a good year or 2.. i ended up just throwing it away and picking up a brand new fram air filter. i doubt that i would even notice a difference.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2009 | 01:51 PM
  #17  
BlackBADaSS02's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 1
From: Millville, NJ
Default

I've had a K&N filter on my car for over 5 years. I've never had a problem with it. You just can't go nuts when you re-oil it and you'll be ok.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2009 | 04:09 PM
  #18  
BrandonWS6's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Default

Sorry kind of off topic, but if a porting a TB makes 5 hp, how much does a porting an intake manifold normally make?
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2009 | 09:34 AM
  #19  
ls1curt's Avatar
Thread Starter
8 Second Club
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 3
From: CT
Default

i decided to port it last night, took quite a bit of material off and smoothed it out. didnt get a chance to really get on it cause it started raining but now its done and didnt cost me anything
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2009 | 10:09 AM
  #20  
NAVY99B4C's Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
From: Walton, Indiana
Default

Ive done a comparison on k+n v.s. paper filter v.s. no filter. on a dyno and the numbers were very different. i gained 17 hp with a k+n filter compared to a paper filter. and it was about the same with no filter on it but obviously you all kow not to do that. i run one in my car and have since i got it, making my own pulls on our dyno showed me all the difference i needed to see. id go with a k+n all the way.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:45 AM.