Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Preliminary Dyno Results from LSX Intake - Courtesy of MTI!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-14-2004, 02:29 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Preliminary Dyno Results from LSX Intake - Courtesy of MTI!

Inital Results: 7.4 HP gain over an LS6 Intake on a 427 CID F-Body.

This was the 78MM version with ported stock TB, bolted on with no changes to tuning or anything else on the vehicle.

We'll continue the fine tuning this afternoon and post more results as we generate then.

- Wayne, David and Jayson at Motorsport Technologies
Attached Thumbnails Preliminary Dyno Results from LSX Intake - Courtesy of MTI!-fast.jpg  
Old 01-14-2004, 02:32 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
 
Sheomet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Fairbanks, AK
Posts: 1,807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

How much less would that be on a 346 LS1? Those results seem pretty disappointing to me for the cost.
Old 01-14-2004, 02:33 PM
  #3  
Launching!
 
Stew w/92&00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

interesting....
Old 01-14-2004, 02:35 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
 
Colonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Troy, AL
Posts: 9,246
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Weird, we have one thread where it picked up 13 RWHP on a stock heads/mild cam car and another where it only picked up 7 RWHP on a big CI engine.
Old 01-14-2004, 02:36 PM
  #5  
TECH Regular
 
Cobraeater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Plano, Tx.
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Isn't the 90mm intake recomended for bigger than 346ci?
Old 01-14-2004, 02:38 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cobraeater
Isn't the 90mm intake recomended for bigger than 346ci?
We chose to test the 78mm version first as we're waiting on the 90mm TB to be released.

Thanks.
Old 01-14-2004, 02:43 PM
  #7  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (38)
 
Nine Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 32,987
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

I'm betting the throttle body size is the main restriction on the big 427ci engine. Also, this 427ci engine has a relatively small 236/236 cam in it.

Tony
Old 01-14-2004, 02:44 PM
  #8  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
gomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Confederacy
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 2000SS
Inital Results: 7.4 HP gain over an LS6 Intake on a 427 CID F-Body.

This was the 78MM version with ported stock TB, bolted on with no changes to tuning or anything else on the vehicle.

We'll continue the fine tuning this afternoon and post more results as we generate then.

- Wayne, David and Jayson at Motorsport Technologies

Any plans to do a stock cube car today or tomorrow?
Old 01-14-2004, 02:47 PM
  #9  
!LS1 11 Second Club
 
SouthFL.02.SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Miami
Posts: 7,133
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gomer
Any plans to do a stock cube car today or tomorrow?

Old 01-14-2004, 02:50 PM
  #10  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (17)
 
Tally TransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tallahassee, Fl
Posts: 3,410
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SouthFL.02.SS
Old 01-14-2004, 02:58 PM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
 
Colonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Troy, AL
Posts: 9,246
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Jayson tells me they'll be trying out some larger TBs (I volunteered a BBK I have laying around there somewhere) to wring some more HP out of this intake.
Old 01-14-2004, 03:01 PM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Fireball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cecil County Raceway!!!
Posts: 8,484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

was the dyno testing done on the same day like it was done at Thunder?
Old 01-14-2004, 03:01 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
DONAIMIAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NW Houston, TX
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yea hopefully with the bigger TB it will make bette numbers or else its gona be some pissed of people that pre-ordered the intakes.
Old 01-14-2004, 03:03 PM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Scalpel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lexington, Ky
Posts: 7,000
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I'll cancel my order if that's all it provides on a 427 after all the bugs/TBs are utilized, etc.
Old 01-14-2004, 03:04 PM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
The Juggernaut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago,IL
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

can the 78mm intake be hogged out to use a BBk 80 mm TB without the reducer?
Old 01-14-2004, 03:04 PM
  #16  
TECH Apprentice
 
DG Gordon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Midland Texas
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

7.4 hp is very disapointing. Especially on that motor. I would have expected that from a stock motor and the more power the more hp is gained. Maybe this will drive down prices!
Old 01-14-2004, 03:07 PM
  #17  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Fireball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cecil County Raceway!!!
Posts: 8,484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DG Gordon
7.4 hp is very disapointing. Especially on that motor. I would have expected that from a stock motor and the more power the more hp is gained. Maybe this will drive down prices!
I agree with tony. big motors take alot of air and I'm betting that the TB is a large restriction at that point. For small CID cars with ported heads you see a massive flow drop in the intake ports once you bolt on a LS6 intake. if some of this flow is restored with the LSX intake, power gains can be exceptional (if the TB doesn't pose a restriction yet)
Old 01-14-2004, 03:13 PM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SouthFL.02.SS
we will be testing stock cars and H/C cars tommorow and Friday.

thanks
Old 01-14-2004, 03:26 PM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
 
pimpmaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It may only be 7.4, but it was also said that there were no changes to tuning. I wonder what that would change to with the 90mm TB and having it tuned for that intake?
Old 01-14-2004, 03:38 PM
  #20  
9 Second Club
 
Nickn20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I think to be truly fair to FAST, on a motor like this is to use the 90mm TB version AND port match the intake to the intake port of the head, I am sure they need it!!! then get some numbers for us!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:14 AM.