Preliminary Dyno Results from LSX Intake - Courtesy of MTI!
#1
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Preliminary Dyno Results from LSX Intake - Courtesy of MTI!
Inital Results: 7.4 HP gain over an LS6 Intake on a 427 CID F-Body.
This was the 78MM version with ported stock TB, bolted on with no changes to tuning or anything else on the vehicle.
We'll continue the fine tuning this afternoon and post more results as we generate then.
- Wayne, David and Jayson at Motorsport Technologies
This was the 78MM version with ported stock TB, bolted on with no changes to tuning or anything else on the vehicle.
We'll continue the fine tuning this afternoon and post more results as we generate then.
- Wayne, David and Jayson at Motorsport Technologies
#6
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cobraeater
Isn't the 90mm intake recomended for bigger than 346ci?
Thanks.
Trending Topics
#8
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Confederacy
Posts: 3,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2000SS
Inital Results: 7.4 HP gain over an LS6 Intake on a 427 CID F-Body.
This was the 78MM version with ported stock TB, bolted on with no changes to tuning or anything else on the vehicle.
We'll continue the fine tuning this afternoon and post more results as we generate then.
- Wayne, David and Jayson at Motorsport Technologies
This was the 78MM version with ported stock TB, bolted on with no changes to tuning or anything else on the vehicle.
We'll continue the fine tuning this afternoon and post more results as we generate then.
- Wayne, David and Jayson at Motorsport Technologies
Any plans to do a stock cube car today or tomorrow?
#16
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Midland Texas
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
7.4 hp is very disapointing. Especially on that motor. I would have expected that from a stock motor and the more power the more hp is gained. Maybe this will drive down prices!
#17
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cecil County Raceway!!!
Posts: 8,484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DG Gordon
7.4 hp is very disapointing. Especially on that motor. I would have expected that from a stock motor and the more power the more hp is gained. Maybe this will drive down prices!
#19
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It may only be 7.4, but it was also said that there were no changes to tuning. I wonder what that would change to with the 90mm TB and having it tuned for that intake?
#20
9 Second Club
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think to be truly fair to FAST, on a motor like this is to use the 90mm TB version AND port match the intake to the intake port of the head, I am sure they need it!!! then get some numbers for us!