New LSX dyno #'s

I'll wait till someone dyno's a full bolt-on internally stock LS1 with the 90mm LSX intake before I buy one. I'm still on the LS1 intake so it should be a huge improvement no matter what

And wouldn't a 90mm LSX along with a 90mm TB (and 90mm lid/MAF as well I guess) be too much for a stock internal motor, even one with good headers/exhaust?
And I wonder if adding the big stuff up top would also justify using 1 7/8 headers instead of 1 3/4 as well (talking 346 of course).
But would going from oval at the lid/MAF to round at the TB/intake cause any kind of flow issues if that were the case?
Maybe the K+N kit would be better?
Maybe the K+N kit would be better?
If the 85mm MAFs are properly calibrated and you tested it with a extension off the 85mm MAF you would probalby get some pretty good numbers

I'd like to see the following:
FAST with 90mm T-body
Smooth bore plastic tubing from the 90mm throttle body to the 85mm MAF (without screen)
more tubing to a big *** conical K&N 4 x 9 x 6.5 or similar
The above just for testing.
It would be easy to route a large *** K&N to the pass side fender area if your battery is relocated to the trunk like mine.
All you'd need is a MAF wire extensions, tubing and a K&N. Would be very simple to do


Chris
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
We did put a conical filter on the MA while testing and lost 10hp/10tq across the rev range.The filter was about 10" long off a P1 Stang setup.

I was more interested to see you lost that much with the dual/dual, I'll have to open the cutout on the dyno next time - I would be happy with 15 extra rwhp..
Thanks for taking the time to dyno before/after on the lsx.





