Combining Ram Air setups
What kind of performance gains would be expected?
Last edited by Suzaku; Jan 25, 2011 at 03:56 PM.
Here's a pic of what I was doing today, foglight ram air is next on my list.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I bought it off of E-bay about a month and a half ago, why aren't you selling it anywhere else anymore?
EDIT:
Oh, I can see how the picture can be confusing. The blackish grey part above the layer of clear silicone is the WS6 Air Box.
The rest of the CAI continues to run under the WS6 Airbox, but it is sealed off by the silicone.
Last edited by Suzaku; Jan 25, 2011 at 11:33 PM.
I've sealed the ram air scoop on my hood to the airbox, but I have yet to put it through a dyno yet.
I'll keep you guys up to date on what happens when I put it through a dyno and cover each one of the ram intakes individually.
The first source, the engine is providing vacuum.
The second source, the hood ram air.
The third source, the under-body scoop ram-air.
And the lowest source of resistance is the engine which is providing negative pressure.
So unless the intake is being pressurized at a rate faster than the first (Higher than 1 PSI) source (engine), there shouldn't be any backwards flow or loss in effectiveness. And I doubt that Ram-air reaches 1PSI when working with an engine under full load. What it does do I think, is decrease the amount of effort required for the engine to pump air into itself, thus the horsepower gain. Of course, this depends on the speed at which the vehicle is traveling.
I will be stealing a spare boost gauge from my brother really soon to test my theory at 80mph.
The first source, the engine is providing vacuum.
The second source, the hood ram air.
The third source, the under-body scoop ram-air.
And the lowest source of resistance is the engine which is providing negative pressure.
So unless the intake is being pressurized at a rate faster than the first (Higher than 1 PSI) source (engine), there shouldn't be any backwards flow or loss in effectiveness. And I doubt that Ram-air reaches 1PSI when working with an engine under full load. What it does do I think, is decrease the amount of effort required for the engine to pump air into itself, thus the horsepower gain. Of course, this depends on the speed at which the vehicle is traveling.
I will be stealing a spare boost gauge from my brother really soon to test my theory at 80mph.
I've had a Debaffled Hood and FRA for 12+ yrs now with no adverse effect on performance. Even if the Air is forced from one portal to the other it's still being injested by the engine under WOT.
I've sealed the ram air scoop on my hood to the airbox, but I have yet to put it through a dyno yet.
I'll keep you guys up to date on what happens when I put it through a dyno and cover each one of the ram intakes individually.
You can only accurately test this at the track, and it has already been done. The scoop style under the car is in a higher pressure area and will force more air into the lid than the lower pressure area of the stock ram air scoops. I promise you that if the lower air box is sealed to block the factory air path the car will be faster down the track(or on the road for that matter). I'm pretty sure Chris1313 is one of those that actually tested this theory, but there are others here as well.
Leaving the front of the airbox open is going to allow the high pressure air forced in from the scoop to escape. As stated by zracer323 above the air will take the path of least resistance. That path is straight out the front of your hood.
I'm only trying to save you some work by sharing what others have already tested. You sound determined to find out for yourself and that is a good thing. Please share your results when you get them so others can benefit from it.












