Mavns WARR Performance 102mm TB Review/write up. + Nic Williams 102 for reference!
#21
#25
#26
My fast 92 fb was a pos iac hole was way too small on my car even after I opened it up a bit. Swapped on a NW 102 and had the car idling perfect cold AND hot in 30 min. I tuned the fast for 3 weeks and couldn't get that to happen
#28
The FAST does not seal up all the way. Which is probably why its IAC port is small... the total bypass air should still be enough for a h/c car. I never had any problems with hot or cold starts even with my 16 deg overlap cam.
I'll have it for sale pretty soon btw. I went to NW to get rid of the ridge. With the smaller cam, I had to feed too much throttle to get the car to move. Bigger cam didn't care.
I'll have it for sale pretty soon btw. I went to NW to get rid of the ridge. With the smaller cam, I had to feed too much throttle to get the car to move. Bigger cam didn't care.
#30
I am wondering how this TB (Warr) fixed the problems of the Fast if they are so much alike? I have a Fast 102 on my motor and I am heading to the Dyno soon. I sure don't want to get all the way down there just to have issues and not be able to get this thing dialed in and then order the Warr. Decisions, decisions!